SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

potential trade partners

Created by: RussianRangers9
Team: 2021-22 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 3, 2021
Published: Jun. 3, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,000,000
3$2,200,000
3$900,000
6$4,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Holtby, Braden
  3. 2021 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Explanation. Vancouver needs cap space and rangers have. They get rid of Eriksson, a horrible contract, and holtby, an overpayed backup for van. eriksson costs a lot to move but instead rangers decide they want to move up int the draft so they trade a younger cheaper backup goalie and the 15oa pick for all of holtby and erikkson with the 9oa and a 2nd. pretty fair imo
VAN
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar
  2. 2021 1st round pick (NYR)
  3. 2021 4th round pick (NYR)
2.
BUF
  1. Jones, Zachary
  2. Kakko, Kaapo
  3. Strome, Ryan
  4. 2021 1st round pick (VAN)
  5. 2022 3rd round pick (NYR)
3.
NYR
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (TBL)
Additional Details:
Davidson loves Schneider and wanted him when he was drafting for the rangers. i think he would maybe want to reunite with him so maybe this works. A cap dump with a a prospect for a mid round pick
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,904,802$0$5,832,500$7,595,198
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,750,000$4,750,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 3
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:25 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 2,064
Intriguing deal for Vancouver. I think that’s an easy yes.
OldManRutherford and cooliny liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:26 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: sedin33
Intriguing deal for Vancouver. I think that’s an easy yes.


i agree that its pretty fair. holtby didnt have a great year so he could have a comeback which could be great to mentor a young goalie like shesterkin. also getting rid of eriksson is huge so you have more space for hughes and petty
sedin33 liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:28 a.m.
#3
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,611
Likes: 3,457
With how the Rangers dumped lundqvist do you really think he comes back except to retire as a ranger? And putting him in as the third goalie in rotation AGAIN certainly won’t convince him to come back. He may be the king but his time in a NYR uniform is done.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:31 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 961
There are good players still at 15 so I agree with most on here the Vancouver trade is a good offer.
sedin33 and cooliny liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:33 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: evelutions2
With how the Rangers dumped lundqvist do you really think he comes back except to retire as a ranger? And putting him in as the third goalie in rotation AGAIN certainly won’t convince him to come back. He may be the king but his time in a NYR uniform is done.


i signed him as a contract so he can just retire a ranger
evelutions2 liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:33 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: BubbleDemko
There are good players still at 15 so I agree with most on here the Vancouver trade is a good offer.


it seems like a fair trade for both sides
OldManRutherford liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:34 a.m.
#7
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
I would take out our first pick in the Vancouver deal (maybe send 2nd or 3rd instead). If they are getting Georgiev and dumping two huge contracts, they would be worth their 1st.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:35 a.m.
#8
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
Quoting: RussianRangers9
i signed him as a contract so he can just retire a ranger


I do the same thing. Then stick him on LTIR and people know whats up.
RussianRangers9 liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:37 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 961
Quoting: NYRFan92360244
I would take out our first pick in the Vancouver deal (maybe send 2nd or 3rd instead). If they are getting Georgiev and dumping two huge contracts, they would be worth their 1st.


You do that and there is no deal . Plain and simple Canucks are not using a top 10 pick to move cap when they can move it internally other ways .
RussianRangers9 liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:38 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: NYRFan92360244
I would take out our first pick in the Vancouver deal (maybe send 2nd or 3rd instead). If they are getting Georgiev and dumping two huge contracts, they would be worth their 1st.


no its not. georgiev didnt have a great season either
Jun. 3, 2021 at 10:50 a.m.
#11
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
Quoting: BubbleDemko
You do that and there is no deal . Plain and simple Canucks are not using a top 10 pick to move cap when they can move it internally other ways .


Right now, with above deal, you would be moving 7 spots in 1st round. For that, you unload two huge contracts, get a great back-up goalie, and add a 4th pick.

In other words, you are valuing the Holtby/Ericsson dumps around a 6th round pick.

The trade should be: 9th oa + two cap dumps --> Georgiev, 2nd, 4th
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:01 a.m.
#12
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
Quoting: RussianRangers9
no its not. georgiev didnt have a great season either


Sure, but even if you value Georgiev at 7th round pick value, it doesn't add up.

#16 overall + #112 overall + #208 overall (Georgiev value) + [6th round value] = #9 overall

Subtract a 6th from both sides, add in Ericsson and Holtby, and the two cap dumps here are only valued at 6th rounder.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:05 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 961
Quoting: NYRFan92360244
Right now, with above deal, you would be moving 7 spots in 1st round. For that, you unload two huge contracts, get a great back-up goalie, and add a 4th pick.

In other words, you are valuing the Holtby/Ericsson dumps around a 6th round pick.

The trade should be: 9th oa + two cap dumps --> Georgiev, 2nd, 4th


So keep Georgiev your 2nd and your 4 th , and we will buyout Virtanen and Holby and put Roussel in the minors and we get 7.5 more cap space and select 9 th. Not a big deal.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:09 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: NYRFan92360244
Sure, but even if you value Georgiev at 7th round pick value, it doesn't add up.

#16 overall + #112 overall + #208 overall (Georgiev value) + [6th round value] = #9 overall

Subtract a 6th from both sides, add in Ericsson and Holtby, and the two cap dumps here are only valued at 6th rounder.


so holtby has value that is similar to georgiev. ill say this holtby>=georgie erikkson+9th=<15th. so erikkson<4th
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:12 a.m.
#15
LafreneiretoKravtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 833
Rangers get bent over in that Vancouver trade. That's really, really bad. If anything, at least grab a 4th liner the Rangers could use.

And the Columbus trade isnt much better.

With Buch and Eichel, who are you not re-signing? Fox? Zibanejad?
AFox23 and Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:30 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
RussianRangers39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 354
Quoting: Josh
Rangers get bent over in that Vancouver trade. That's really, really bad. If anything, at least grab a 4th liner the Rangers could use.

And the Columbus trade isnt much better.

With Buch and Eichel, who are you not re-signing? Fox? Zibanejad?


zibanejad tradedeadline deal? just an idea
Jun. 3, 2021 at 11:45 a.m.
#17
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,611
Likes: 3,457
Quoting: RussianRangers9
i signed him as a contract so he can just retire a ranger


That’s good
Jun. 3, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.
#18
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 1,432
Quoting: RussianRangers9
zibanejad tradedeadline deal? just an idea


N M C
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll