Edited Jun. 13, 2021 at 11:26 a.m.
Quoting: NYRFan92360244
Strome for Greenway one for one? No way Rangers consider that. Greenway would be a 4th liner for Rangers. Strome would be your #1 centre. Got to add a 1st or prospect like Boldy, Rossi or Marat.
Don't be an idiot, Strome isn't worth a Top 50 prospect. Let alone either Rossi or Boldy, both of whom fall into that category.
Greenway is a middle six power forward, irregardless of where you play him. That doesn't change just because you have Panarin, Lafreniere, and Kreider. Or did you just miss the fact Greenway is fully capable of playing both wing positions? He can still play up and down the Rangers lineup playing in a RW role.
Furthermore, let's not try and pretend Strome is something he's not. Irregardless of where we would slot him, in the short term, Strome is still a middle sixer who would be moved further down the lineup once Rossi is ready to take over. Rossi alone has a floor of a high-end 2nd line center, which means he already has a far higher ceiling than Strome ever had.
And this notion that Strome automatically becomes our best center is blatantly false too. Joel Eriksson-Ek exists. Strome would be our 2nd best center, even if he was used on a line with either Kaprizov or Fiala, that doesn't mean he's better than Eriksson-Ek, because he's not.