SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Taking bad contracts results in 8 1st rounders in 2 years

Created by: Reason
Team: 2021-22 Seattle Kraken
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 15, 2021
Published: Jun. 15, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Most of the bad contracts expire in the next 2 years, BOB is a hefty one to take on but the return makes it worth contemplating.

Team could possibly squeeze into the playoffs next year in their weak division, if not they have some assets they can flip at next few deadlines.

With 8 first rounders in the next two years, and 2022 is supposed to be a strong draft class, the team is set up for future success.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$900,000
3$2,500,000
3$3,500,000
1$750,000
2$1,000,000
Trades
1.
SEA
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Killorn, Alex
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TBL)
TBL
2.
SEA
  1. Boychuk, Johnny
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (NYI)
  3. 2022 1st round pick (NYI)
NYI
3.
SEA
  1. Bobrovsky, Sergei
  2. Lundell, Anton
  3. 2021 1st round pick (FLA)
  4. 2022 1st round pick (FLA)
FLA
4.
SEA
  1. Hill, Adin [RFA Rights]
ARI
5.
6.
SEA
  1. Bean, Jake [RFA Rights]
CAR
7.
8.
9.
SEA
  1. Dunn, Vince [RFA Rights]
STL
10.
SEA
  1. Dickinson, Jason [RFA Rights]
DAL
11.
12.
SEA
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2022 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
13.
14.
SEA
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [RFA Rights]
SJS
15.
16.
17.
18.
SEA
  1. Gauthier, Julien [RFA Rights]
NYR
19.
20.
21.
SEA
  1. Lind, Kole [RFA Rights]
VAN
22.
23.
24.
SEA
  1. Lindström, Gustav [RFA Rights]
DET
25.
26.
27.
28.
SEA
  1. Neal, James
  2. 2021 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (EDM)
EDM
29.
30.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
2022
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
2023
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$76,265,000$0$850,000$5,235,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,133,333$1,133,333
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,166,667$3,166,667
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$10,000,000$10,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000 ($225,000$225K$225,000$225K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,650,000$1,650,000 ($525,000$525K$525,000$525K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$716,667$716,667 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:19 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,974
Likes: 18,306
Florida gives two 1sts and Lundell to move Bob?
That seems like a little much to me.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:20 a.m.
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Make it 7 because Flames won't be dumping one of the best leaders in the locker room
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:20 a.m.
#3
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,285
Likes: 4,472
Your not getting Stillman so can we interest you in Calvin De Haan
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:24 a.m.
#4
In Zito We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1,596
If we have to pay that much to get rid of Bobrovsky, there is no reason to do it
The issues with his contract are blown out of proportion
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:26 a.m.
#5
NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 1,103
Isles put Boychuk on LTIR so there's no cap issues for NYI, and he seems to have a job lined up for him when he "retires", so him getting traded is likely not going to happen.

If you want to take Ladd instead, that can be arranged. Ladd, a 1st and a 4th for you to take Leddy or Varlamov in the Expansion Draft.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:32 a.m.
#6
Daws is underrated
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 636
Quoting: slapshot723
Isles put Boychuk on LTIR so there's no cap issues for NYI, and he seems to have a job lined up for him when he "retires", so him getting traded is likely not going to happen.

If you want to take Ladd instead, that can be arranged. Ladd, a 1st and a 4th for you to take Leddy or Varlamov in the Expansion Draft.


I think the Ladd deal works out best for them and us so I hope it happens
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:33 a.m.
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,429
Likes: 22,636
You've overestimated the value of dumping many of these players.
Boychyuk is not a bad contract at all....as long as he stays on LTIR which he is.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:34 a.m.
#8
NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 1,103
Quoting: islandersfan14
I think the Ladd deal works out best for them and us so I hope it happens


I don't think it will, but we can hope.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:41 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: Gmonwy
Make it 7 because Flames won't be dumping one of the best leaders in the locker room


its probbaly not enough for them to take on that contract
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:42 a.m.
#10
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: Gmonwy
Make it 7 because Flames won't be dumping one of the best leaders in the locker room


No other things to acknowledge there no sir awesome face

As we all know games are played in the locker room

First one to get the tape ball into the garbage and go!
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:45 a.m.
#11
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Why get up 3 1sts (including an outstanding prospect in Lundell), when you can just buy him out in a year or two (Or 3?). They're going to need a second goalie next year regardless, so they might as well keep him for another year or two. The buyout is actually pretty affordable.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:46 a.m.
#12
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
I'm of two minds 🤔

Yeah the Bob contract is absolutely horrendous

It's holding them back from another level entirely

But Lundell is pretty similar value to Kaapo Kakko

And that '22 1st of theirs could be very interesting

If I were them I'd use B assets to unload but not A

Also the Bob buyout is surprisingly decent
Reason liked this.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:47 a.m.
#13
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Really cool and constructive AGM

So many fun opportunities for seattle to pursue

Hope to see them explore
Jun. 15, 2021 at 10:57 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Florida gives two 1sts and Lundell to move Bob?
That seems like a little much to me.


Quoting: VijayPatel11
If we have to pay that much to get rid of Bobrovsky, there is no reason to do it
The issues with his contract are blown out of proportion


Quoting: Lenny7
Why get up 3 1sts (including an outstanding prospect in Lundell), when you can just buy him out in a year or two (Or 3?). They're going to need a second goalie next year regardless, so they might as well keep him for another year or two. The buyout is actually pretty affordable.



Florida is essentially giving up an A+ prospect, and two likely late 1st round picks, one of which is in a extremely unpredictable draft, to rid themselves of the second most expensive goaltender in the NHL who will be a backup to Knight for the next 5 seasons, and is owed a significant amount of money. The team is in contention now and will have to pay Barkov and huberdeau after next season, assuming they sign with FLA both will be 10 million plus players. Add to it, Florida seems to always be a team where every dollar has to count and I think this deal makes sense, Marleau cost a 1st for one year when there wasn’t a flat cap.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 10:58 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: Radu47
Really cool and constructive AGM

So many fun opportunities for seattle to pursue

Hope to see them explore


Cheers! Should be interesting for sure, lots of ways they can go!
Jun. 15, 2021 at 11:03 a.m.
#16
In Zito We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1,596
Quoting: Reason
Florida is essentially giving up an A+ prospect, and two likely late 1st round picks, one of which is in a extremely unpredictable draft, to rid themselves of the second most expensive goaltender in the NHL who will be a backup to Knight for the next 5 seasons, and is owed a significant amount of money. The team is in contention now and will have to pay Barkov and huberdeau after next season, assuming they sign with FLA both will be 10 million plus players. Add to it, Florida seems to always be a team where every dollar has to count and I think this deal makes sense, Marleau cost a 1st for one year when there wasn’t a flat cap.


There are no real issues brought on by his contract, we can easily just buy him out in a few years
No reason to give up a significant portion of our future to get rid of a non-issue
Our goalie tandem is essentially 11 million dollars, not bad when you think about it
Lenny7 and Reason liked this.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 11:25 a.m.
#17
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Reason
Florida is essentially giving up an A+ prospect, and two likely late 1st round picks, one of which is in a extremely unpredictable draft, to rid themselves of the second most expensive goaltender in the NHL who will be a backup to Knight for the next 5 seasons, and is owed a significant amount of money. The team is in contention now and will have to pay Barkov and huberdeau after next season, assuming they sign with FLA both will be 10 million plus players. Add to it, Florida seems to always be a team where every dollar has to count and I think this deal makes sense, Marleau cost a 1st for one year when there wasn’t a flat cap.


When it comes to Barkov and Huberdeau, they've actually got the perfect set up leading up to those contracts right now, if the players want to stay.

Barkov extension year: Stralman/Nuti become UFA's, clearing over $8 mil in space (They've only got $46 mil commited to that season right now).
Huberdeau extension year: Yandle/Hornqvist become UFA's, blearing $11.65 mil in space (They've only got $17.5 commited to that season right now, which includes Bob).

Obviously they'll make additions, and will have a bunch of players to sign, but bumping each of Barkov and Huberdeau over $10 mil (If that's what it ends up taking) isn't going to screw the team cap wise. Zito did an excellent job reducing the teams cap last offseason.
VijayPatel11 and Reason liked this.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 11:56 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: VijayPatel11
There are no real issues brought on by his contract, we can easily just buy him out in a few years
No reason to give up a significant portion of our future to get rid of a non-issue
Our goalie tandem is essentially 11 million dollars, not bad when you think about it




Quoting: Lenny7
When it comes to Barkov and Huberdeau, they've actually got the perfect set up leading up to those contracts right now, if the players want to stay.

Barkov extension year: Stralman/Nuti become UFA's, clearing over $8 mil in space (They've only got $46 mil commited to that season right now).
Huberdeau extension year: Yandle/Hornqvist become UFA's, blearing $11.65 mil in space (They've only got $17.5 commited to that season right now, which includes Bob).

Obviously they'll make additions, and will have a bunch of players to sign, but bumping each of Barkov and Huberdeau over $10 mil (If that's what it ends up taking) isn't going to screw the team cap wise. Zito did an excellent job reducing the teams cap last offseason.


Good points backed up by numbers, I can appreciate that! I guess I look at it from a “Will they have a better opportunity to win it then next year?” perspective. With AB and JH being on team friendly deals the extra 10 million in cap space could put then in an even better spot than they currently are, especially with how low FA’s were signing for last season.
This will probably be their only chance to completely wipe the contract without having to take back bad contracts in return, and value wise I feel like that would be around the cost to do so, if Seattle is even willing to take that contract on. It obviously has long term consequences though, that is a lot of young talent to give up!
I get it from both perspectives.
I appreciate the mature discussion!
VijayPatel11 liked this.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 11:59 a.m.
#19
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Reason
Good points backed up by numbers, I can appreciate that! I guess I look at it from a “Will they have a better opportunity to win it then next year?” perspective. With AB and JH being on team friendly deals the extra 10 million in cap space could put then in an even better spot than they currently are, especially with how low FA’s were signing for last season.
This will probably be their only chance to completely wipe the contract without having to take back bad contracts in return, and value wise I feel like that would be around the cost to do so, if Seattle is even willing to take that contract on. It obviously has long term consequences though, that is a lot of young talent to give up!
I get it from both perspectives.
I appreciate the mature discussion!


Cheers man!

I think I look at it from the "What's the Panthers system look like right now vs. after they make that trade?" perspective too. It's not great right now (It's OK), and would be a barren wasteland after.

I definitely don't disagree that Seattle is in a great position to take advantage of a lot of cap strapped teams though. You could absolutely make an argument that they're even better off than Vegas was.
Reason liked this.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 12:01 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: palhal
You've overestimated the value of dumping many of these players.
Boychyuk is not a bad contract at all....as long as he stays on LTIR which he is.


I’m interested to hear your opinion, which ones specifically are you referencing and what values would you consider fair?

Fair on Boychyuk , I was unaware he was on LTIR.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:51 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: Gmonwy
Make it 7 because Flames won't be dumping one of the best leaders in the locker room


Quoting: vr1995
its probbaly not enough for them to take on that contract


Ya I thought that was a pretty reasonable ask for dumping that contract. If your worried about the dressing room, you could find better 4th liners who are good in the room for significantly less cap, heck you could almost pay a full 4th line of guys that are good in the room for his cap.

Of course this trade would only make sense if Calgary figures they are a playoff team next year, I figure they think they are.
Jun. 15, 2021 at 9:57 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: slapshot723
Isles put Boychuk on LTIR so there's no cap issues for NYI, and he seems to have a job lined up for him when he "retires", so him getting traded is likely not going to happen.

If you want to take Ladd instead, that can be arranged. Ladd, a 1st and a 4th for you to take Leddy or Varlamov in the Expansion Draft.


Possible something could be worked out there, that is a significant amount of combined cap to take, but interesting counter proposal!
Jun. 16, 2021 at 9:00 a.m.
#23
NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 1,103
Quoting: Reason
Possible something could be worked out there, that is a significant amount of combined cap to take, but interesting counter proposal!


Yeah to be honest I don't expect a deal like that to happen, but one can dream. The Expansion Draft is the perfect opportunity for NYI to lose cap space, which is why I prefer a trade where Seattle takes on salary than then claiming someone like Bellows, Dal Colle, Koivula, or Aho.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll