Quoting: Kravtsov_Stan
Ty Smith is much better on offense but looking at his advanced stats his xGA is worse and his Def is about the same, Risto is worse but its not by a massive amount
They are not really even close
Smith CF%: 58.8
Risto CF%: 41.6
Smith CF% relative: +11.7
Risto CF% relative: -7.0
Smith FF%: 55.7
Risto FF%: 40.1
Smith FF% relative: +9.1
Risto FF% relative: -8.4
xGA and xGF are often used, but out of context, stats that do not factor in possession.
Its like saying a Left Tackle stinks because he doesn't prevent many touchdowns.
In this case, Risto's xGF should be discounted since his team has only 40% possession of the puck when he is on the ice.
Smith's xGA should be discounted since his team has nearly 60% possession of puck when he is on the ice
Use share of shots, share of possession, share of quality scoring chances, share of high-danger chances, etc
Much more useful.