SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Punting the season

Created by: The_Rocket
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2021
Published: Jun. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
No cap dumps. No buyouts (except Virtanen). Add some young-ish guys for cheap who may or may not breakout. Wait for all the bad contracts to expire. If everything works, great! If not, you’re still in a good spot for the next season
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
1$850,000
6$8,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. 2021 6th round pick (WPG)
2.
BOS
  1. Woo, Jett
Additional Details:
Expansion exempt
3.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,868,159$648,780$1,982,500$3,631,841
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 16, 2021 at 11:08 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 1,077
I'm becoming more and more convinced that taking a gap year next year and then reloading the following year is the way to go. It seems like it'll be really tough to move enough cap to bring in the pieces we need in this market. It sucks cause this team isn't that good, but the core is still there.

However, management's comments indicate that they will do the opposite.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 11:20 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,936
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: Canucks33
I'm becoming more and more convinced that taking a gap year next year and then reloading the following year is the way to go. It seems like it'll be really tough to move enough cap to bring in the pieces we need in this market. It sucks cause this team isn't that good, but the core is still there.

However, management's comments indicate that they will do the opposite.


I would prefer an aggressive offseason, where they add one or two good pieces while shedding some cap. I’m just not sure this management group is capable of it. It’s a lot easier to simply punt the season, take a couple flyers, and see what happens
Jun. 16, 2021 at 11:45 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,464
Likes: 8,105
Quoting: Canucks33
I'm becoming more and more convinced that taking a gap year next year and then reloading the following year is the way to go. It seems like it'll be really tough to move enough cap to bring in the pieces we need in this market. It sucks cause this team isn't that good, but the core is still there.

However, management's comments indicate that they will do the opposite.


Probably the best way to go, especially with the 22 and 23 drafts having franchise altering talents. I'm all for dumping cap to Detroit as I'm a red wings fan but this would be the most logical approach to this season. I also don't think Benning is really willing to pay to dump contracts he signed either, makes him look bad. It's going to be tough enough to sign petterson and Hughes with the cap situation they are in let alone paying for better players.
Jun. 17, 2021 at 12:06 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 1,077
Quoting: The_Rocket
I would prefer an aggressive offseason, where they add one or two good pieces while shedding some cap. I’m just not sure this management group is capable of it. It’s a lot easier to simply punt the season, take a couple flyers, and see what happens


What assets are you going to use to 1) make some cap room and 2) add a couple good players?

Hopefully Seattle would take Eriksson if we also send Gadjovich and a 3rd. There isn't much to choose from Vancouver so maybe they'd consider it. If that happens we can sign a player or two, but nothing earth shattering.
Jun. 17, 2021 at 12:08 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 1,077
Quoting: Lancebmx
Probably the best way to go, especially with the 22 and 23 drafts having franchise altering talents. I'm all for dumping cap to Detroit as I'm a red wings fan but this would be the most logical approach to this season. I also don't think Benning is really willing to pay to dump contracts he signed either, makes him look bad. It's going to be tough enough to sign petterson and Hughes with the cap situation they are in let alone paying for better players.


We also don't have excess assets to spend. That was one of the reasons why I didn't like the Toffoli trade; If they deemed Madden expendable (which is probably the right call), then I would have rather attached him to Eriksson a year later. Instead they used a good trade chip on a rental.
Jun. 17, 2021 at 12:22 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,464
Likes: 8,105
Quoting: Canucks33
We also don't have excess assets to spend. That was one of the reasons why I didn't like the Toffoli trade; If they deemed Madden expendable (which is probably the right call), then I would have rather attached him to Eriksson a year later. Instead they used a good trade chip on a rental.


Definitely tried to speed the rebuild up but set it back probably double the time
Jun. 17, 2021 at 2:57 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: The_Rocket
I would prefer an aggressive offseason, where they add one or two good pieces while shedding some cap. I’m just not sure this management group is capable of it. It’s a lot easier to simply punt the season, take a couple flyers, and see what happens


I'm fine either way. What I fear is they pay to move some contracts out via trade and buyouts but then use the money to sign guys like Haula, Savard or pretty much any other mid tier UFA's to deals in the 3-4m range (both AAV and term) in an attempt to improve depth. If they're going to be aggressive clearing cap then they need to use that cap on an impact player. If not then punt the season and see what happens.
Jun. 17, 2021 at 6:26 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 330
well I agree with what you see as this off season game plan, the Boston offer is horrible as much as I want Lauzon its going to cost more
6 year deals are horrible, keep them in RFA status or give them 8 year deals - no in-between ****.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll