Quoting: newballcoach
We can definitely disagree, but your evaluation of Liljegren is based on assumptions. You assume he will become those things. He has had difficulty processing and making quick decisions during his NHL stints. That sounds like Nikita Zaitsev and Cody Ceci to me. Capable NHLers sure, but not exactly what you're writing home about. I hope he becomes a solid middle pair defenceman, I just don't see it YET. We are talking about next season.
The Leafs finally have a defence core that isn't embarrassing and you want to get rid of half of them? Why? I see no reason to move Rielly or Holl unless you upgrade to better players that cost less. Seems unlikely. Just because Rielly will be a UFA in a year doesn't mean he needs to be traded, it just means he may not be on the team in a year. The idea that you need to get "something" for him I think is misplaced. What you will get from him is excellent play, that's enough.
Petan is an RFA. You have no idea what the other two will become. You should read the description, I said I wasn't sure what Seattle would want (and you have no idea either). But we do know they'll have an abundance of middle-6 talent and they can't play all of them, so it will make sense they look to make trades that will bolster their prospect ranks and their AHL team. Maybe they want a Hallander and the Leafs do that deal, I have no idea. The framework I think makes sense, even if (as I clearly said in the description) the players involved could vary.
Ya, all good I’m down to agree/disagree on Liljegren. I’m just basing my facts on people who follow the Marlies a lot closer than you and I, Nick Barden, Kyle Cushman, Josh Kloke, and even Greg Moore’s evaluation of Liljegren is been very high. All think he will be on the team next year.
As for Rielly, the Leafs cannot afford to let another FA walk out the door for nothing. The money is not there to resign him next year, especially if the go out in bring in someone to replace Hyman.
As for Holl I am tired of him looking like a top 4 defenceman for 20 games and then come crashing back to earth and be a total non factor. He is a liability when he is not paired with Muzzin. The eye test says that and more importantly so do the numbers.
And for all the lack of faith you have with Liljegren what makes you think Nick Robertson is ready? He hasn’t been able to stay healthy long enough to even get a good look at him. All he has is an NHL shot, and if you think that’s all he needs then why don’t you have Gogolev. He as arguably had a bigger impact with the Marlies more than Robertson.