SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Please

Created by: Lindenness11
Team: 2021-22 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 23, 2021
Published: Jun. 23, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Preferably get rid of Matheson too but who tf wants that contract without us give up a 1st round pick
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
3$3,000,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
2$2,000,000
2$1,200,000
3$3,500,000
3$3,500,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (LAK)
2.
PIT
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
3.
PIT
    Expansion
    4.
    PIT
    1. 2023 2nd round pick (NJD)
    NJD
    1. Pettersson, Marcus
    2. 2023 3rd round pick (PIT)
    5.
    PIT
    1. Tkachuk, Matthew ($3,500,000 retained)
    CGY
    1. Légaré, Nathan
    2. Rust, Bryan
    3. 2022 1st round pick (PIT)
    4. 2022 2nd round pick (PIT)
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the ANA
    2022
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    2023
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    20$81,500,000$79,728,031$0$0$1,771,969
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $8,700,000$8,700,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,200,000$3,200,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,636,364$2,636,364
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $950,000$950,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $725,000$725,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $7,250,000$7,250,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    G
    UFA - 4
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,400,000$4,400,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,875,000$4,875,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 4

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:53 p.m.
    #1
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 18,255
    Likes: 10,598
    Not even close for Tkachuk. Even with no retention
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:27 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2017
    Posts: 3,012
    Likes: 350
    Quoting: Gmonwy
    Not even close for Tkachuk. Even with no retention


    Its OK keep him!

    Holy bleep* that's way too much for tkachuk. I'd rather have rust alone than tkachuk. This does not make us better at all. Rethink that tkachuk trade. @Lindenness11
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:29 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2017
    Posts: 3,012
    Likes: 350
    Edited Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:35 p.m.
    Also holy bleep again thats wayyy too much money for ulmark. Has no one learned from price and bobrovsky. You dont overpay goalies. Still nowhere near as bad as that tkachuk trade though. Tkachuk should not be worth that much at all. Its like you're trading for Crosby. Actually not even Crosby would get that probably
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:31 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2017
    Posts: 3,012
    Likes: 350
    Edited Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:38 p.m.
    Rest is fine I guess. But seems like a rebuild almost which we shouldnt do when we just about won a presidents trophy. Still won our division though which was harder thus year with Boston in it which is normally a top 3 team in the Atlantic.
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:38 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2021
    Posts: 1,356
    Likes: 483
    giving up mccann for nothing? hextall would be blasted out of his office if this ever happened
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 6:45 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 40
    Likes: 5
    Quoting: MajesticWalrus
    Also holy bleep again thats wayyy too much money for ulmark. Has no one learned from price and bobrovsky. You dont overpay goalies. Still nowhere near as bad as that tkachuk trade though. Tkachuk should not be worth that much at all. Its like you're trading for Crosby. Actually not even Crosby would get that probably


    Tf your on that is good for tkachuk, who is the exact player we need, and I love rust but he's he'd gonna get waaay more money from another team at the end of the year so why let him walk??? Instead we get a player ego gets on you're face and hits? Which is what we need in the playoffs. Also playing with sid, dude would get 30+ goals a season and he's 23 while rust is 30, so not rebuilding but staying good Anda bettering ourself for the future, also ullmark had
    Quoting: Pens2000
    giving up mccann for nothing? hextall would be blasted out of his office if this ever happened


    2 2nd round picks is nothing for a guy he disappears and gets pushed around every playoffs, he's awesome in the season but we only have 2 years left to win, I'd rather coleman
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 6:50 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 40
    Likes: 5
    Quoting: MajesticWalrus
    Also holy bleep again thats wayyy too much money for ulmark. Has no one learned from price and bobrovsky. You dont overpay goalies. Still nowhere near as bad as that tkachuk trade though. Tkachuk should not be worth that much at all. Its like you're trading for Crosby. Actually not even Crosby would get that probably


    Dude that Is how much tkachuk will get, he's an Allstar winger who is 23 years old who hits and gets in your face, which Is what we need. I love rust but he is most likely getting offered 6 mil plus from another team at the end of the season, so would you rather him walk for nothing? He's 30 and tkachuk is 23 and is also better than rust, also tkachuk can score 30+ with sid easy, he can put up rusts number and he comes with his strength and in your face game, that's a move that betters us now and in the future, and also ullmark has a .917 save percentage with Buffalo the past 3 years, that is ****ing crazy, jarry wouldn't be able to do thoes numbers and yeah maybe 4 is a bit much, could do 3.5 but it's better than signing a 40 year old rinnie or Anderson for 5 mil plus
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 7:44 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2021
    Posts: 1,356
    Likes: 483
    Quoting: Lindenness11
    Tf your on that is good for tkachuk, who is the exact player we need, and I love rust but he's he'd gonna get waaay more money from another team at the end of the year so why let him walk??? Instead we get a player ego gets on you're face and hits? Which is what we need in the playoffs. Also playing with sid, dude would get 30+ goals a season and he's 23 while rust is 30, so not rebuilding but staying good Anda bettering ourself for the future, also ullmark had

    2 2nd round picks is nothing for a guy he disappears and gets pushed around every playoffs, he's awesome in the season but we only have 2 years left to win, I'd rather coleman


    sure but they can definitely get something better than 2 future seconds
    Jun. 23, 2021 at 9:24 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2017
    Posts: 3,012
    Likes: 350
    Quoting: Lindenness11
    Dude that Is how much tkachuk will get, he's an Allstar winger who is 23 years old who hits and gets in your face, which Is what we need. I love rust but he is most likely getting offered 6 mil plus from another team at the end of the season, so would you rather him walk for nothing? He's 30 and tkachuk is 23 and is also better than rust, also tkachuk can score 30+ with sid easy, he can put up rusts number and he comes with his strength and in your face game, that's a move that betters us now and in the future, and also ullmark has a .917 save percentage with Buffalo the past 3 years, that is ****ing crazy, jarry wouldn't be able to do thoes numbers and yeah maybe 4 is a bit much, could do 3.5 but it's better than signing a 40 year old rinnie or Anderson for 5 mil plus


    Oh really cause I recall Jarry finishing higher than that with a 921 save percentage last year
    Jun. 27, 2021 at 12:12 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    Quoting: MajesticWalrus
    Its OK keep him!

    Holy bleep* that's way too much for tkachuk. I'd rather have rust alone than tkachuk. This does not make us better at all. Rethink that tkachuk trade. @Lindenness11


    I definitely do not think this is too much for Tkachuk. He's the type of player that everyone wants on their team: physical, skilled, and fast. He would be an absolute game changer come playoff time. I love Rust he's one of my favorite players, but his contract is coming up soon unfortunately.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll