SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How to Fix the Sharks

Created by: SFish415
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 29, 2021
Published: Jun. 29, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$975,000
2$975,000
3$2,100,000
2$875,000
2$2,375,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
4$6,500,000
1$1,000,000
3$3,350,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Chytil, Filip [RFA Rights]
  2. Georgiev, Alexandar
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (BUF)
NYR
  1. Kane, Evander
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. 2021 5th round pick (SEA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$73,910,000$0$857,500$7,590,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$975,000$975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,425,000$2,425,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
$3,350,000$3,350,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 29, 2021 at 11:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
You couldn’t pay us enough to take Kane’s contract. We’ve got cap issues and need CENTERS NOT WINGERS.
Jun. 29, 2021 at 11:06 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Edited Jun. 29, 2021 at 11:13 p.m.
So they can't be fixed.

Turn back the calender to June 30, 2017 and not sign Vlasic, not re-sign Kane and not trade for Eriksson.
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Jun. 29, 2021 at 11:20 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
Quoting: Riley816
So they can't be fixed.

Turn back the calender to June 30, 2017 and not sign Vlasic, not re-sign Kane and not trade for Eriksson.


This
Jun. 30, 2021 at 12:05 a.m.
#4
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Vlasic has positive/even value?? ... no he doesnt

I see no reason for the Rags to take that trade
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 2:04 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,216
Likes: 2,867
Quoting: Riley816
So they can't be fixed.

Turn back the calender to June 30, 2017 and not sign Vlasic, not re-sign Kane and not trade for Eriksson.


A) Absolutely agreed on Vlasic

B) Kane’s contract is fine he’s worth it

C) Who’s Eriksson?
Riley816 liked this.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 2:07 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
A) Absolutely agreed on Vlasic

B) Kane’s contract is fine he’s worth it

C) Who’s Eriksson?


Karlsson. Erik autos to Eriksson....
Jun. 30, 2021 at 6:54 a.m.
#7
Old Timer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 379
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
You couldn’t pay us enough to take Kane’s contract. We’ve got cap issues and need CENTERS NOT WINGERS.


Change Kane to Hertl and we're all set.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 10:14 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 469
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
You couldn’t pay us enough to take Kane’s contract. We’ve got cap issues and need CENTERS NOT WINGERS.


The Kane contract is fine, he is a star winger and produces like one. Just makes no sense for the Ranger roster needs.
Jun. 30, 2021 at 10:18 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2016
Posts: 916
Likes: 221
I see some Rangers fans saying no BUT i'm a BIG!!!! yes on this trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll