SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Strome and Keith

Created by: hockeyconnor97
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2021
Published: Jul. 1, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
2$900,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,500,000
1$1,500,000
4$4,500,000
6$5,250,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Neal, James
  2. 2021 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. 2021 5th round pick (TBL)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$79,830,301$669,339$1,307,500$1,669,699

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
RFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,650,000$1,650,000 ($525,000$525K$525,000$525K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000 ($3,375,000$3M$3,375,000$3M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 1, 2021 at 8:20 p.m.
#1
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 2,350
Take Strome out and Chicago probably accepts
Jul. 1, 2021 at 8:29 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 62
Likes: 9
Strome isn't worth the first but Keith for Neal + pick works
Jul. 1, 2021 at 8:34 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 2,421
Make the 5 a 7 or TB either trades Toronto the 7 for Hutchinson or signs a league minimum. Who sits behind Vasy is pretty much inconsequential considering Vasy plays 62 games at probably a .7 point% meaning 82-86 points when he's in net no time this century had 97 not made the playoffs , so they need 11-15 points out of the backup in 20 games most AHL goalies could do that behind TB.
Jul. 1, 2021 at 8:34 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 325
Likes: 105
Awful trade for the oilers.

Keith was one of the worst defenders in the league and his contract is buyout proof. Great career but the guy is washed
CD282 liked this.
Jul. 1, 2021 at 8:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: PerpetuallySad
Awful trade for the oilers.

Keith was one of the worst defenders in the league and his contract is buyout proof. Great career but the guy is washed


Wrong. Clearly you don't watch the games. Keith was paired with rookies and BoQ who struggled a lot defensively, people who didn't watch him and only are looking at stat sheets don't understand this. If you go into his advanced analytics, when he played with a decent partner like Murphy, he looked good still.

That said, he's not a 1st liner anymore despite the hawks forcing him into 24 minutes a night but he definitely is a good 18 to 20 minute player as a #4 or #5 and anyone saying he's washed up and isn't a NHL player is purely ignorant. His contract has 2 years left also, but the salary is only $1M a year. Hawks should retain some, but at half retained, Hawks shouldn't do this trade. Much rather keep Keith on the roster as a #4 or #5 then give him up for free.

Strome is definitely worth a couple 2nd round picks if not a late 1st. Moving Neal, who IS worthless, costs money and more then a 3rd rounder. This trade doesn't work. Strome for Neal = 1st and 3rd to the Hawks. Keith requires a 3rd or 4th at half retained. Bump up the 3rd to a 2nd and it's close.
JackBurton liked this.
Jul. 1, 2021 at 9:18 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
a better deal would be

Chicago Blackhawks Receive

- J.Neal
- P.Broberg

Edmonton Oilers Receive

- D.Keith
- D.Strome


There could be a late pick added from oilers but this would have legs as basis of a trade IMO.
JackBurton and Bobcaygeon97 liked this.
Jul. 1, 2021 at 10:36 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 325
Likes: 105
Quoting: ChiHawk
Wrong. Clearly you don't watch the games. Keith was paired with rookies and BoQ who struggled a lot defensively, people who didn't watch him and only are looking at stat sheets don't understand this. If you go into his advanced analytics, when he played with a decent partner like Murphy, he looked good still.

That said, he's not a 1st liner anymore despite the hawks forcing him into 24 minutes a night but he definitely is a good 18 to 20 minute player as a #4 or #5 and anyone saying he's washed up and isn't a NHL player is purely ignorant. His contract has 2 years left also, but the salary is only $1M a year. Hawks should retain some, but at half retained, Hawks shouldn't do this trade. Much rather keep Keith on the roster as a #4 or #5 then give him up for free.

Strome is definitely worth a couple 2nd round picks if not a late 1st. Moving Neal, who IS worthless, costs money and more then a 3rd rounder. This trade doesn't work. Strome for Neal = 1st and 3rd to the Hawks. Keith requires a 3rd or 4th at half retained. Bump up the 3rd to a 2nd and it's close.


Chicago is looking to add on D and need the cap to do that, Keith can’t be bought out, Neal can, Keith was the second worst defender in the league in xGF%, Chicago is better with him not on the ice lolol. Salary means nothing unless the owner is hurting for cash, which Edmonton is not. Every rookie Keith played with did better without him so what does that show? Based on performance alone, he has negative value lolol
Jul. 1, 2021 at 11:27 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 1,425
1 year of Marleau @ 6.25 netted the #13 OA. 2 years of Neal @ 5.725 is going to cost more then the #19OA. Even if somehow the 19OA was enough to get someone to eat Neal, Keith is still a useful piece as is Strome which you are not getting that combo for a 3rd.
Jul. 2, 2021 at 12:09 a.m.
#9
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
a better deal would be

Chicago Blackhawks Receive

- J.Neal
- P.Broberg

Edmonton Oilers Receive

- D.Keith
- D.Strome


There could be a late pick added from oilers but this would have legs as basis of a trade IMO.


I like the idea, but no, Broberg has way more value to Edmonton in both future plans and optics to just toss him in like that.
Jul. 2, 2021 at 12:25 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: JackBurton
I like the idea, but no, Broberg has way more value to Edmonton in both future plans and optics to just toss him in like that.


Even if it were us to add a pick?
JackBurton liked this.
Jul. 2, 2021 at 12:23 p.m.
#11
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Even if it were us to add a pick?


Possibly, but the Oil's front office saw something in Broberg that made them pass up Zegras for him. Whether they turn out to be right or wrong remains to be seen, but I think this is a case of optics. You can't just be seen to be giving up on the kid too soon, it makes you as an organization look foolish, and throws away what could turn out to be (with significant marinating) a great defenseman.

I think if they do decide long term to part with him, it will be something like the Strome-Schmaltz trade was. Two guys with great promise who aren't quite working out, get them a change of scenery. Hopefully for them, it doesn't become more of a Nylander/Jokiharju thing... *shudder*
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Jul. 6, 2021 at 11:46 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: PerpetuallySad
Chicago is looking to add on D and need the cap to do that, Keith can’t be bought out, Neal can, Keith was the second worst defender in the league in xGF%, Chicago is better with him not on the ice lolol. Salary means nothing unless the owner is hurting for cash, which Edmonton is not. Every rookie Keith played with did better without him so what does that show? Based on performance alone, he has negative value lolol


Again, you don't watch the games so it's a bad assumption to look at a stats sheet and think you understand. There is a good reason Edmonton wants him on their second line as widely reported.
Jul. 6, 2021 at 3:28 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 325
Likes: 105
Edited Jul. 6, 2021 at 3:35 p.m.
Quoting: ChiHawk
Again, you don't watch the games so it's a bad assumption to look at a stats sheet and think you understand. There is a good reason Edmonton wants him on their second line as widely reported.


It’s widely reported Keith wants out and will be bought out of a trade can’t be found 😂

Kinda glad I didn’t watch Keith get outshot, outchanced, and outscored more than any other dman. Sorry you had to see that
Jul. 6, 2021 at 3:35 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: PerpetuallySad
It’s widely reported Keith wants out and will be bought out of a trade can’t be found 😂


It's freidman SUGGESTING a possible buyout and he's usually not all that accurate on ideas he is spitballing. Most reputable places are saying Keith retained for Caleb Jones and 3rd or 4th. Likely Neal + Jones + 2nd for Keith retained is my guess. Oilers are going to play him on their 2nd line behind nurse, they understand he has value otherwise he'd be on the 3rd line.
Jul. 6, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 325
Likes: 105
Quoting: ChiHawk
It's freidman SUGGESTING a possible buyout and he's usually not all that accurate on ideas he is spitballing. Most reputable places are saying Keith retained for Caleb Jones and 3rd or 4th. Likely Neal + Jones + 2nd for Keith retained is my guess. Oilers are going to play him on their 2nd line behind nurse, they understand he has value otherwise he'd be on the 3rd line.


He should be on the third line
Jul. 6, 2021 at 4:13 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,754
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: ChiHawk
Wrong. Clearly you don't watch the games. Keith was paired with rookies and BoQ who struggled a lot defensively, people who didn't watch him and only are looking at stat sheets don't understand this. If you go into his advanced analytics, when he played with a decent partner like Murphy, he looked good still.

Don't try telling me that he was being dragged down by rookie partners. All three of Keith's most common defense partners had better CF% away from Keith than they did with him:

Murphy with Keith: 46.33% / without: 48.75%
Boqvist with Keith: 48.38% / without: 49.35%
Mitchell with Keith: 41.63% / without: 46.62%

Two of the 3 were appreciably better by xGF% without Keith, Boqvist was the same:

Murphy with Keith: 42.19% / without: 49.31%
Boqvist with Keith: 46.99% / without: 46.50%
Mitchell with Keith: 39.43% / without: 45.98%

Quoting: ChiHawk
BoQ who struggled a lot defensively,

Boqvist with Keith: 45.83 GF% in 220:46
Boqvist without Keith: 50.00 GF% in 393:15

Quoting: ChiHawk
That said, he's not a 1st liner anymore despite the hawks forcing him into 24 minutes a night but he definitely is a good 18 to 20 minute player as a #4 or #5 and anyone saying he's washed up and isn't a NHL player is purely ignorant. His contract has 2 years left also, but the salary is only $1M a year. Hawks should retain some, but at half retained, Hawks shouldn't do this trade. Much rather keep Keith on the roster as a #4 or #5 then give him up for free.

A #4-#5 who carries a $5.5M cap hit is absolutely a cap dump despite the actual salary unless you're sending him to a team that has oodles of cap space and is very cost-conscious. Unfortunately for you there aren't any such teams in Western Canada.
PerpetuallySad liked this.
Jul. 6, 2021 at 4:16 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,754
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: PerpetuallySad
He should be on the third line


Yup, he was 2nd pairing this year and didn't do well (actually 3rd pairing by normal-year QoC). Fewer, sheltered minutes is the only reasonable expectation for Keith... I can't imagine that he'll be better than Jones for the next 2 years, so why do a deal for him at all? I'd rather pay Jones $1M and spend the extra on upgrades elsewhere.
Jul. 6, 2021 at 11:53 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: CD282
Don't try telling me that he was being dragged down by rookie partners. All three of Keith's most common defense partners had better CF% away from Keith than they did with him:

Murphy with Keith: 46.33% / without: 48.75%
Boqvist with Keith: 48.38% / without: 49.35%
Mitchell with Keith: 41.63% / without: 46.62%

Two of the 3 were appreciably better by xGF% without Keith, Boqvist was the same:

Murphy with Keith: 42.19% / without: 49.31%
Boqvist with Keith: 46.99% / without: 46.50%
Mitchell with Keith: 39.43% / without: 45.98%


Boqvist with Keith: 45.83 GF% in 220:46
Boqvist without Keith: 50.00 GF% in 393:15


A #4-#5 who carries a $5.5M cap hit is absolutely a cap dump despite the actual salary unless you're sending him to a team that has oodles of cap space and is very cost-conscious. Unfortunately for you there aren't any such teams in Western Canada.


You can wax poetic with advanced stats until you are blue in the face, that's what fans like to do that don't watch the games. IF you watched the games, you would understand the advanced stats aren't that accurate. There is a reason why people who make a living playing, coaching or scouting hockey do not use advanced stats as a leading indicator of how good a player is; unlike fans, especially those addicted to playing fantasy hockey.

He's a strong #4 on most teams, but can't handle 24 minutes a night anymore. There was also a ton of covering up he was doing positionally for BoQ and Mitchell; stats won't reflect that. He's also on the ice against the strongest of the opposition in the toughest on ice positions. The advanced stats you showed don't extract that and further, it doesn't show how he was covering positionally for Mitchell and BoQ. When both players fell down the lineup, they didn't see the oppositions best lines.

Again, take advanced stats with a grain of salt. The eye test, if you know hockey well enough, is a much better measuring stick so watch every game before you come to such a hard conclusion on who a player is.
Jul. 7, 2021 at 8:46 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,754
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: ChiHawk
You can wax poetic with advanced stats until you are blue in the face, that's what fans like to do that don't watch the games. IF you watched the games, you would understand the advanced stats aren't that accurate. There is a reason why people who make a living playing, coaching or scouting hockey do not use advanced stats as a leading indicator of how good a player is; unlike fans, especially those addicted to playing fantasy hockey.

Again, take advanced stats with a grain of salt. The eye test, if you know hockey well enough, is a much better measuring stick so watch every game before you come to such a hard conclusion on who a player is.

Corsi and goals aren't advanced stats! tears of joy

The fact that you spend most of your time attacking my knowledge of the game shows just how weak your arguments are.

Quoting: ChiHawk
He's a strong #4 on most teams, but can't handle 24 minutes a night anymore. There was also a ton of covering up he was doing positionally for BoQ and Mitchell; stats won't reflect that. He's also on the ice against the strongest of the opposition in the toughest on ice positions. The advanced stats you showed don't extract that and further, it doesn't show how he was covering positionally for Mitchell and BoQ. When both players fell down the lineup, they didn't see the oppositions best lines.

You're right, the stats DON'T show that Keith is on the ice against the strongest of the opposition OR in the toughest on-ice positions. Here's what the stats show:

TOI vs Elites
Murphy: 25.6%
Zadorov: 25.0%
Keith: 22.0%
Mitchell: 21.1%
de Haan: 21.0%

O-zone faceoff%
Boqvist: 62.07%
Keith: 50.85%
Kalynuk: 50.00%
Mitchell: 49.13%
de Haan: 47.49%
Murphy: 40.25%
Zadorov: 38.83%

So your "eye test" was wrong - Keith didn't play the hardest minutes (that went to the Zadorov-Murphy pairing) and he got the 2nd easiest zone starts of any Chicago defenseman.

Do you have any other false narratives you'd like me to dismantle?
Jul. 7, 2021 at 8:50 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 227
Likes: 58
Quoting: wojohawk
1 year of Marleau 6.25 netted the #13 OA. 2 years of Neal 5.725 is going to cost more then the #19OA. Even if somehow the 19OA was enough to get someone to eat Neal, Keith is still a useful piece as is Strome which you are not getting that combo for a 3rd.


That's because The Leaf's are dumb! doesn't mean the rest of the leagues GM's are that dumb. That move cost the Leaf's huge and everyone knows it except Leaf fans.
Keith is awful, he was great once, now, he's below replacement level. The Oilers are better off keeping Jones as he's a more effective defender right now.
Keith can't be bought out, Neal can be. It doesn't make sense for the Oilers to do Neal vs Keith unless Chicago eats Keith's cap. which should be at least Neal's buyout of 3 million.
Jul. 7, 2021 at 12:30 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: CD282
Corsi and goals aren't advanced stats! tears of joy

The fact that you spend most of your time attacking my knowledge of the game shows just how weak your arguments are.


You're right, the stats DON'T show that Keith is on the ice against the strongest of the opposition OR in the toughest on-ice positions. Here's what the stats show:

TOI vs Elites
Murphy: 25.6%
Zadorov: 25.0%
Keith: 22.0%
Mitchell: 21.1%
de Haan: 21.0%

O-zone faceoff%
Boqvist: 62.07%
Keith: 50.85%
Kalynuk: 50.00%
Mitchell: 49.13%
de Haan: 47.49%
Murphy: 40.25%
Zadorov: 38.83%

So your "eye test" was wrong - Keith didn't play the hardest minutes (that went to the Zadorov-Murphy pairing) and he got the 2nd easiest zone starts of any Chicago defenseman.

Do you have any other false narratives you'd like me to dismantle?


How many games have you watched of the Blackhawks this past season?

Stat junkies like you, don't understand all the flaws in how stats are calculated. There are plenty of articles about them and also plenty of articles how players especially but even scouts and teams don't rely on them other then a secondary tool to the eye test. Anyone can digest stats till their blue in the face like you are doing, but there is a reason you don't work in the NHL.

So I'll ask again, how many blackhawks games did you watch this past season? That will give you an answer to how important your stats are.
Jul. 7, 2021 at 1:07 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,754
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: ChiHawk
How many games have you watched of the Blackhawks this past season?

Stat junkies like you, don't understand all the flaws in how stats are calculated. There are plenty of articles about them and also plenty of articles how players especially but even scouts and teams don't rely on them other then a secondary tool to the eye test. Anyone can digest stats till their blue in the face like you are doing, but there is a reason you don't work in the NHL.

So I'll ask again, how many blackhawks games did you watch this past season? That will give you an answer to how important your stats are.

And you do? Are you saying that you're a professional scout and that your "eye test" has more value than mine? You're a funny little man!

tears of joy
Jul. 7, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: CD282
And you do? Are you saying that you're a professional scout and that your "eye test" has more value than mine? You're a funny little man!

tears of joy


"Funny little man" resorting to name calling is simply a way of admitting defeat.

I've been around hockey my whole life at a very high level. If you know the game well enough, the systems the teams plays, what is asked of the players, you can trust your eyes.

I'm saying it is clear, you don't watch much of the blackhawks games and or your eye test fails you; it's either or both. As other Hawks fans on here know, I've been highly critical of some of his positioning the last couple years, but also know he is much better then advanced stats show based on covering for teammates a lot of the times. He's a solid #4 player and there is a reason the Oilers would want him on the 2nd line. Your stats suggest he shouldn't be in the NHL which shows you how flawed they are as clearly he should be playing.
Jul. 7, 2021 at 6:22 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,754
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: CD282
Don't try telling me that he was being dragged down by rookie partners. All three of Keith's most common defense partners had better CF% away from Keith than they did with him:

Murphy with Keith: 46.33% / without: 48.75%
Boqvist with Keith: 48.38% / without: 49.35%
Mitchell with Keith: 41.63% / without: 46.62%

Two of the 3 were appreciably better by xGF% without Keith, Boqvist was the same:

Murphy with Keith: 42.19% / without: 49.31%
Boqvist with Keith: 46.99% / without: 46.50%
Mitchell with Keith: 39.43% / without: 45.98%


Boqvist with Keith: 45.83 GF% in 220:46
Boqvist without Keith: 50.00 GF% in 393:15


A #4-#5 who carries a $5.5M cap hit is absolutely a cap dump despite the actual salary unless you're sending him to a team that has oodles of cap space and is very cost-conscious. Unfortunately for you there aren't any such teams in Western Canada.


@timmah007
Timmah007 liked this.
Jul. 12, 2021 at 7:07 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: CD282
And you do? Are you saying that you're a professional scout and that your "eye test" has more value than mine? You're a funny little man!

tears of joy


LMAO look who's the the "funny little man" now! LMAO laugh
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll