Forums/Armchair-GM

Internal Cap

Created by: SakuThornton
Initial Creation Date: Jul 12, 2021
Published: Jul 12 at 11:07
Team: 2021-22 Arizona Coyotes
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
Hayden, John1$800,000
Hill, Adin1$1,000,000
Hunt, Dryden1$800,000
Pederson, Lane1$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Bunting, Michael2$1,500,000
Rittich, David1$2,000,000
Cole, Ian2$1,750,000
Tinordi, Jarred1$800,000
Trades
ARI
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. Podkolzin, Vasily
VAN
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
ARI
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Garland, Conor [RFA Rights]
ARI
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2021 6th round pick (PIT)
EDM
  1. Kessel, Phil ($2,000,000 retained)
ARI
    expansion
    SEA
    1. Hill, Adin
    ARI
    1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
    2. 2021 2nd round pick (PHI)
    PHI
    1. Pitlick, Tyler
    ARI
    1. Parise, Zach
    2. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
    MIN
    1. Fischer, Christian
    Buyouts
    • Michael Grabner: $1,258,333
    Retained Salary Transactions
    • Phil Kessel: $2,000,000 (29.41%)
    • Oliver Ekman-Larsson: $990,000 (12%)
    • Darcy Kuemper: $1,000,000 (22%)
    DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
    2021
    BOS
    PIT
    ARI
    CBJ
    PHI
    ARI
    PIT
    ARI
    ARI
    PIT
    2022
    ARI
    ARI
    EDM
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    2023
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ARI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES BONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$68,049,579$196,951$3,500,000$13,450,421
    Left WingCenterRight Wing
    BOS
    DeBrusk, Jake
    $3,675,000
    LW
    RFA - 1
    ARI
    Dvorak, Christian
    $4,450,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 4
    ARI
    Keller, Clayton
    $7,150,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 7
    MIN
    Parise, Zach
    $7,538,462
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    ARI
    Schmaltz, Nick
    $5,850,000
    C
    UFA - 5
    VAN
    Podkolzin, Vasily
    $925,000
    RW
    RFA - 3
    ARI
    Crouse, Lawson
    $1,533,333
    LW
    RFA - 1
    ARI
    Hayton, Barrett
    $894,167
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    ARI
    Bunting, Michael
    $1,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    ARI
    Hunt, Dryden
    $800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    ARI
    Larsson, Johan
    $1,400,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    ARI
    Hayden, John
    $800,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    ARI
    Pederson, Lane
    $775,000
    C
    RFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    ARI
    Chychrun, Jakob
    $4,600,000
    LD
    UFA - 4
    VAN
    Schmidt, Nate
    $5,950,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    ARI
    Kuemper, Darcy
    $3,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    PHI
    Gostisbehere, Shayne
    $4,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    ARI
    Lyubushkin, Ilya
    $1,350,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Rittich, David
    $2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Cole, Ian
    $1,750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    ARI
    Söderström, Victor
    $863,333
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Tinordi, Jarred
    $800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul 12 at 11:08
    #1
    Joined: Sep 2020
    Posts: 9,982
    Likes: 5,060
    I doubt Vancouver does that
    Jul 12 at 11:08
    #2
    Ragsandbluesfan
    Joined: Nov 2017
    Posts: 18,178
    Likes: 5,051
    Not getting Pod for OEL
    audiodave liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:10
    #3
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 13,019
    Likes: 5,155
    Both teams decline.

    Zona gains zero payroll relief which is why they want to move Garland.

    And Boston is not giving up a 1st to swap wings with the same career PPG average.
    Jul 12 at 11:11
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Edited Jul 12 at 11:18
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Both teams decline.

    Zona gains zero payroll relief which is why they want to move Garland.

    And Boston is not giving up a 1st to swap wings with the same career PPG average.


    Garland's next contract will be well above what DeBrusk's currently is. DeBrusk = trending downwards and got called out by his coach for "stat-padding attempts" last season. Garland = Arizona's best player for the past 2 seasons and a 70-point player in Boston. He's a legitimate 1st-line caliber winger
    Jul 12 at 11:13
    #5
    2018 Canucks
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 1,059
    Likes: 333
    Canucks an easy no. There is a reason a deal never happened last go around. Hint: $8.25m
    audiodave liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:16
    #6
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Joined: Oct 2020
    Posts: 5,822
    Likes: 2,268
    The chosen one Podkolzin!!! For OEL 😲😩😵

    You have desecrated the sacred Benning parchment

    How dare you speak such slander to the canucks

    You must endure 9 hours of punishment now

    For shaaame! Shame!! *somber chanting*
    SakuThornton and audiodave liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:17
    #7
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Joined: Oct 2020
    Posts: 5,822
    Likes: 2,268
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    Garland's next contract will be well above what DeBrusk's currently is. DeBrusk = on the decline. Garland = Arizona's best player for the past 2 seasons and a 70-point player in Boston. He's a legitimate 1st-line caliber winger


    Absolutely on Garland

    But Debrusk on the decline at 24 almost impossible

    He had a down year and should be fine until 2025ish
    Jul 12 at 11:19
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: Nighthawk
    Canucks an easy no. There is a reason a deal never happened last go around. Hint: $8.25m


    You clearly haven't been paying attention to trade rumors for the last month. Vancouver is trying to shed Schmidt's contract in order to acquire OEL.
    Radu47 liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:20
    #9
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Joined: Oct 2020
    Posts: 5,822
    Likes: 2,268
    Quoting: Nighthawk
    Canucks an easy no. There is a reason a deal never happened last go around. Hint: $8.25m


    It's only a 2ish M $ difference between he and N S

    😐

    For 4 years

    Yeah the last two are quite rough

    Hence Podkolzin ✔
    SakuThornton liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:23
    #10
    2018 Canucks
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 1,059
    Likes: 333
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    You clearly haven't been paying attention to trade rumors for the last month. Vancouver is trying to shed Schmidt's contract in order to acquire OEL.

    Aah OEL gains cap & 1 roster player replaces 2.
    Cap space is available in 2022 not 2021.
    The trade rumours are from Arizona not Vancouver.

    You now have all the info.
    Jul 12 at 11:25
    #11
    Let's go Canucklehea
    Joined: Oct 2020
    Posts: 450
    Likes: 69
    The only way OEL gets traded to Vancouver is if the Coyotes take Myers or Eriksson and Beagle
    audiodave liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:25
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: Nighthawk
    Aah OEL gains cap & 1 roster player replaces 2.
    Cap space is available in 2022 not 2021.
    The trade rumours are from Arizona not Vancouver.

    You now have all the info.


    I would suggest you do a bit more research on the topic here, you seem to be quite misinformed.
    Jul 12 at 11:40
    #13
    Definitely not Jim
    Joined: Jun 2021
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 8
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    I would suggest you do a bit more research on the topic here, you seem to be quite misinformed.


    The "rumor" from Nick Kypreos last week was already debunked by the local media in Vancouver. The folks that are actually connected to the inner-workings of the Canucks have all strongly suggested that the Canucks have zero interest in OEL this time around.

    And, I would suggest you give the Canucks fans (or any fan that gives you feedback about the trades you proposed with their team) a bit more respect for taking the time to respond and give you their feedback. We all ought to know that everyone who submits one of these mock GMs is usually taking a huge shot in the dark. The posters who respond back are usually fans of the teams involved in trades and signings. These fans clearly have the time to listen to talk radio, go on twitter, reddit, internet forums like this. They are informed and probably have a much better pulse on what is being said about their team than anyone from outside the market.

    Good luck moving that $50mm contract, though.
    Nighthawk and audiodave liked this.
    Jul 12 at 11:53
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Edited Jul 13 at 12:01
    Quoting: JimBenningsBurner
    The "rumor" from Nick Kypreos last week was already debunked by the local media in Vancouver. The folks that are actually connected to the inner-workings of the Canucks have all strongly suggested that the Canucks have zero interest in OEL this time around.

    And, I would suggest you give the Canucks fans (or any fan that gives you feedback about the trades you proposed with their team) a bit more respect for taking the time to respond and give you their feedback. We all ought to know that everyone who submits one of these mock GMs is usually taking a huge shot in the dark. The posters who respond back are usually fans of the teams involved in trades and signings. These fans clearly have the time to listen to talk radio, go on twitter, reddit, internet forums like this. They are informed and probably have a much better pulse on what is being said about their team than anyone from outside the market.

    Good luck moving that $50mm contract, though.


    Nice job assuming that "fans of the teams" are the only ones who can stay informed about what's going on around the league. Quite foolish.

    https://theprovince.com/sports/hockey/nhl/vancouver-canucks/patrick-johnston-sure-the-canucks-could-trade-nate-schmidt
    Jul 12 at 11:59
    #15
    Joined: Aug 2016
    Posts: 184
    Likes: 80
    No way Vancouver makes that trade. OEL isn't worth his contract at this point. If Arizona wants to move him they will probably have to retain salary or take back a equally bad contract. Something like to Buffalo: OEL, to Arizona: Jeff Skinner. Most rumors are just something someone made up and have no truth to them, saying otherwise makes you look dumb.
    Jul 13 at 12:01
    #16
    Definitely not Jim
    Joined: Jun 2021
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 8
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    Nice job assuming that "fans of the teams" are the only ones who can stay informed about what's going on around the league. Quite foolish


    Says the person who clearly has not stayed informed about the Canucks, and is instead telling Canucks fans information that has already been debunked. Got it.
    Jul 13 at 12:03
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: audiodave
    No way Vancouver makes that trade. OEL isn't worth his contract at this point. If Arizona wants to move him they will probably have to retain salary or take back a equally bad contract. Something like to Buffalo: OEL, to Arizona: Jeff Skinner. Most rumors are just something someone made up and have no truth to them, saying otherwise makes you look dumb.


    I'm afraid you are the one here who is looking dumb, my friend. The OEL to Vancouver rumors have been circulating for over a year now, with the league's most trusted sources reporting on them. The Canucks could not get a deal done last offseason but have more cap space to work with now, and Kypreos has received intel that a Schmidt for OEL package is likely should the two teams make a deal.
    Jul 13 at 12:11
    #18
    Big Shoots
    Joined: Sep 2020
    Posts: 556
    Likes: 124
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    I'm afraid you are the one here who is looking dumb, my friend. The OEL to Vancouver rumors have been circulating for over a year now, with the league's most trusted sources reporting on them. The Canucks could not get a deal done last offseason but have more cap space to work with now, and Kypreos has received intel that a Schmidt for OEL package is likely should the two teams make a deal.


    I suppose it could be possible given Schmidt wants out but I don't see him accepting a trade to Arizona. On top of that OEL is downgrade as a player and one of the worst contracts in the league. You'd have to retain and add your best prospect. Podkolzen is not getting traded.
    Jul 13 at 12:13
    #19
    Joined: Aug 2016
    Posts: 184
    Likes: 80
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    I'm afraid you are the one here who is looking dumb, my friend. The OEL to Vancouver rumors have been circulating for over a year now, with the league's most trusted sources reporting on them. The Canucks could not get a deal done last offseason but have more cap space to work with now, and Kypreos has received intel that a Schmidt for OEL package is likely should the two teams make a deal.


    It didn't happen last year and is very unlikely to happen this year. If it does, Podkolzin won't be part of the deal and Arizona would have to retain a lot of salary.
    Jul 13 at 12:22
    #20
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 13,019
    Likes: 5,155
    Edited Jul 13 at 12:42
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    Garland's next contract will be well above what DeBrusk's currently is. DeBrusk = trending downwards and got called out by his coach for "stat-padding attempts" last season. Garland = Arizona's best player for the past 2 seasons and a 70-point player in Boston. He's a legitimate 1st-line caliber winger


    Lol, you are completely ignorant.

    Debrusk real salary this season will be 4.8m. Garland is not getting that in arb. Probably around 3.5.

    Don’t believe what you read. Yes Debrusk had a terrible year. Compounded by 2 injuries, 2 positive Covid tests, battling depression since the bubble, demoted after adding Hall. Before then he was averaging 25g per 82 games. Something Garland has not done. He put up more points in his first 3 years then Garland did in his.

    He needs a change of scenery at this point and will likely get it. But this is bad for both teams. Neither would consider it.

    If Zona trades Garland it will be for a 1st and a player on his ELC.

    Boston will trade Debrusk for a d man or picks. If they move him with a 1st it will be for a massive upgrade, not a lateral move.
    Jul 13 at 12:30
    #21
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Lol, you are completely ignorant.

    Debrusk real salary this season will be 4.8m. Garland is not getting that in arb. Probably around 3.5.

    Don’t believe what you read. Yes Debrusk had a terrible year. Compounded by 2 injuries, 2 positive Covid tests, battling depression since the bubble, demoted after adding Hall. Before then he was averaging 25g per 82 games. Something Garland has not done. He put up more points in 3 years then Garland did in 4.

    He needs a change of scenery at this point and will likely get it. But this is bad for both teams. Neither would consider it.

    If Zona trades Garland it will be for a 1st and a player on his ELC.

    Boston will trade Debrusk for a d man or picks. If they move him with a 1st it will be for a massive upgrade, not a lateral move.


    Garland $3.5? Get real. Garland will get minimum $5 million in arbitration, and it won't go to arb because any team that acquires him knows his value. Garland is twice the player DeBrusk is. Don't act like that's a "lateral move" smh
    Jul 13 at 12:32
    #22
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 13,019
    Likes: 5,155
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    Garland $3.5? Get real. Garland will get minimum $5 million in arbitration, and it won't go to arb because any team that acquires him knows his value. Garland is twice the player DeBrusk is. Don't act like that's a "lateral move" smh


    Lol, 1st year arb elig player that averages just over half point a game is not getting 5m in arb. That’s UFA $.

    And no, he isn’t. Last year, yes. Last year is gone.
    Jul 13 at 12:35
    #23
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Lol, 1st year arb elig player that averages just over half point a game is not getting 5m in arb. That’s UFA $.

    And no, he isn’t. Last year, yes. Last year is gone.


    LOL what a fail. Garland finished with a 65-point pace last season with ARIZONA of all teams. And that doesn't even begin to do justice his on-ice possession contribution, he's an all-around monster and the most underrated player in the league, further evidenced by your ignorance. DeBrusk has extremely little trade value at this point.
    Jul 13 at 12:38
    #24
    Joined: Jan 2017
    Posts: 13,019
    Likes: 5,155
    Quoting: SakuThornton
    LOL what a fail. Garland finished with a 65-point pace last season with ARIZONA of all teams. And that doesn't even begin to do justice his on-ice possession contribution, he's an all-around monster and the most underrated player in the league, further evidenced by your ignorance. DeBrusk has extremely little trade value at this point.


    Ah, Habs fan, that explains it. 🙄. Ok. 👍🏻
    Jul 13 at 12:53
    #25
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2017
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Ah, Habs fan, that explains it. 🙄. Ok. 👍🏻


    Ok? Ah, Bruins fan, that explains it. 🙄. Ok. 👍🏻
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Remove Option
    Submit Poll