SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

if its offered

Created by: major_hassle
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2021
Published: Jul. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$900,000
3$7,000,000
4$6,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
2$2,000,000
2$800,000
3$1,750,000
4$4,250,000
4$2,200,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Holtby, Braden
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Kessel, Phil ($2,000,000 retained)
ARI
  1. Lind, Kole
  2. Myers, Tyler ($2,000,000 retained)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,208,992$648,780$1,900,000$1,291,008
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,800,000$4,800,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$783,333$783,333
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$2,200,000$2,200,000
RD
UFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 13, 2021 at 11:18 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 330
Vancouver straight declines the Chicago one

Vancouver also declines the Arizona one - Ownership will not entertain retained salary trades that involve Canuck contracts that have multiple years left
Jul. 13, 2021 at 2:55 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 309
Likes: 60
Quoting: yztnuK
Vancouver straight declines the Chicago one

Vancouver also declines the Arizona one - Ownership will not entertain retained salary trades that involve Canuck contracts that have multiple years left


did brett connolly light you up in junior or what buddy
this would be by far the cheapest eriksson + holtby dump the canucks could ever get
Jul. 13, 2021 at 3:05 p.m.
#3
Lets go Canucklehea
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 209
Quoting: yztnuK
Vancouver straight declines the Chicago one

Vancouver also declines the Arizona one - Ownership will not entertain retained salary trades that involve Canuck contracts that have multiple years left


How do you know that is what ownership is telling JB? I have never heard that at all and I listen to Vancast and all the other Canuck related shows and podcast and that has never been mentioned
Last I heard JB say everything is on the on the table and used the word creative
Jul. 13, 2021 at 4:23 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 330
Quoting: IjustNEEDaTROYgamble
How do you know that is what ownership is telling JB? I have never heard that at all and I listen to Vancast and all the other Canuck related shows and podcast and that has never been mentioned
Last I heard JB say everything is on the on the table and used the word creative


It’s literally what they have been saying the podcast. All last year. Aqua will not pay for a player who’s is not on this team.
The idea of paying a salary to an employee who no longer works for you, for many years after he’s gone is a ludicrous one and personally I’d fire any GM who would suggest it to me
Jul. 13, 2021 at 4:28 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 330
Quoting: major_hassle
did brett connolly light you up in junior or what buddy
this would be by far the cheapest eriksson + holtby dump the canucks could ever get


Hahahaha that is funny man.
Seriously though. Connelly is junk and has 2 years left on his deal at $3.5 per.
You are trading the 40th pick away to get rid of Holtby who can be bought out cheaply or retain salary in a trade that gets Vancouver a 7th and Eriksson who can be buried in the minors. Both 1 year deals for a cheaper version of Eriksson but for 2 years.
You are extending the problem and compounding by trading the 40th pick. A team that has no top tier prospects, a team that needs that 40th overall.

The time to add picks and sweeteners to these bums was last year.
major_hassle liked this.
Jul. 13, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#6
Lets go Canucklehea
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 209
Quoting: yztnuK
It’s literally what they have been saying the podcast. All last year. Aqua will not pay for a player who’s is not on this team.
The idea of paying a salary to an employee who no longer works for you, for many years after he’s gone is a ludicrous one and personally I’d fire any GM who would suggest it to me


It depends on what you are getting back, you can’t say that if it helps the Canucks get a good younger player at centre or RHD that is cost controlled like Jost, Foegele, Bean, Lauzon or by some chance Toews being available. It’s not smart hockey or business sense to say no to something before hearing or inquiring about a player because Schmidt’s contract is not going to be easy to move in a flat cap NHL.
Jul. 13, 2021 at 5:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 330
Quoting: IjustNEEDaTROYgamble
It depends on what you are getting back, you can’t say that if it helps the Canucks get a good younger player at centre or RHD that is cost controlled like Jost, Foegele, Bean, Lauzon or by some chance Toews being available. It’s not smart hockey or business sense to say no to something before hearing or inquiring about a player because Schmidt’s contract is not going to be easy to move in a flat cap NHL.


Myers contract is difficult to move in a flat cap. Schmidt won’t be. There is market for him and despite failing in Vancouver he is career analytics dream. He was actually one of the better analytical players for the Canucks last year.

Vancouver can easily with no doubt get a 3rd back, same as they paid.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll