SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reuniting the London Knights

Created by: Flames22
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 15, 2021
Published: Jul. 15, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I know Toronto fans won't like the Marner trade, and I know this creates massive cap issues for Calgary next offseason, but it sure would be fun if that old Knights line could be Calgary's new 2nd line.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
1$950,000
2$750,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (CGY)
3.
BUF
  1. Dubé, Dillon [RFA Rights]
  2. Kylington, Oliver [RFA Rights]
  3. Lindholm, Elias
  4. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
4.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$70,303,833$0$0$11,196,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 15, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Toronto declines
Jul. 15, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
#2
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Gmonwy
Toronto declines


Pretty quickly if I may add to this.
Jul. 15, 2021 at 2:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Leafs wouldn't even do this deal if you took out lucic
Jul. 15, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 231
Likes: 44
Normally the team taking on the cap dump player gets extra compensation so I guess thats the 2nd? So then its Monahan for Marner 1 for 1... ye nah
Jul. 15, 2021 at 2:58 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
I don't see how this makes sense for the Leafs. They lose a top line winger to Monahan as their 3C? Then to boot they take on Lucic's terrible contract and to do so only receive a 2nd as compensation? If you want Marner, you better start with Tkachuk.
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:05 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,914
Likes: 19,292
Toronto trade is horrible for them

Flames decline the Buffalo trade

Dvorak has more value than Zary (currently)
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:08 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I don't see how this makes sense for the Leafs. They lose a top line winger to Monahan as their 3C? Then to boot they take on Lucic's terrible contract and to do so only receive a 2nd as compensation? If you want Marner, you better start with Tkachuk.


I don't think it's has to start with tkachuk, Lindholm and mangiapane could be a good base for a package
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:13 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: felixf21
I don't think it's has to start with tkachuk, Lindholm and mangiapane could be a good base for a package


The Leafs already have a Mangiapane in Kerfoot who they want to get rid of...
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:39 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The Leafs already have a Mangiapane in Kerfoot who they want to get rid of...


I think mangiapane is a lot better than kerfoot and would be a good human replacement. I'd totally do something like Lindholm+mangiapane+2021 first for marner considering cap space
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:42 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 1,299
You can get Max Domi for free!!
Jul. 15, 2021 at 3:46 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: felixf21
I think mangiapane is a lot better than kerfoot and would be a good human replacement. I'd totally do something like Lindholm+mangiapane+2021 first for marner considering cap space


Except the Leafs wouldn't do that. Marner is a top 5 producer in the league! They aren't going to take that much of a drop off when moving him hence why I said Tkachuk would be a must.
Jul. 15, 2021 at 4:30 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Except the Leafs wouldn't do that. Marner is a top 5 producer in the league! They aren't going to take that much of a drop off when moving him hence why I said Tkachuk would be a must.


I just think we should take a drop off to get multiple lesser pieces that are still quite good
Jul. 15, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: felixf21
I just think we should take a drop off to get multiple lesser pieces that are still quite good


I think someone would offer something better. Maybe something to help the D.
Jul. 15, 2021 at 4:36 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I think someone would offer something better. Maybe something to help the D.


I think we need forwards not d, our d wasn't the problem
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll