SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Absolutely Unacceptable for Doug Wilson to Protect Burns FIRE DW

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 18, 2021
Published: Jul. 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
2$800,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
1$750,000
3$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Tierney, Chris
Additional Details:
From either OTT or SEA.
OTT
  1. Kellman, Joel
  2. 2021 4th round pick (TOR)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$65,485,363$0$425,000$16,014,637
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 18, 2021 at 2:42 p.m.
#1
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,627
Likes: 12,353
Who else is worth protecting on that D core? Simek?
Doubtful Seattle was taking Burns anyway.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 2:43 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 1,265
Seattle is gonna take simek
Jul. 18, 2021 at 2:58 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 2,867
Not really. It would be nice to shed his cap 100% but he’s still good. Protecting Simek over Burns would be equally controversial.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 3:21 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 733
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Who else is worth protecting on that D core? Simek?
Doubtful Seattle was taking Burns anyway.

It's not about worth protecting, it's about needing to get rid of and create cap space and get younger and get rid of a player who is about to be one of yet another anchor on this team (if not already). At least give it a chance. A 0% chance is always < a small chance.

Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Not really. It would be nice to shed his cap 100% but he’s still good. Protecting Simek over Burns would be equally controversial.

Simek's cap hit is a fraction of Burns' 8mil. And Burns' contract is still for 4 more years going until he's 40.

Simek can be moved for a late rounder -- Burns cannot be moved without sweeteners or salary retention or reacquiring a negative asset.

MTL left Price exposed. NSH left Duchene and Johnansen. STL Tarasenko. No excuse for DW to protect Burns and quite frankly I'm just as shocked at how the fanbase isn't up in arms about this...
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:33 p.m.
#5
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 12,817
Seattle has so many better options available both financially and personnel. Jake Bean (young, very good), Soucy (cheap, manageable), Demelo (manageable and good) etc etc - Burns being exposed wouldnt have done anything but annoying him probably.

Burns would have cost assets to move and so keep the relationship healthy as opposed to exposing him for the sake of exposing him. Yes him moving would be beneficial but it wasn’t gonna happen and they weren’t gonna pay the assets.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll