SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stop waiting start doing - POST EXPANSION DRAFT

Created by: Bufftard716
Team: 2021-22 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 18, 2021
Published: Jul. 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Going to have to settle for market prices in the form of young prospects, higher picks and shedding veteran talent, weaponizing cap space for players who might not see the ice and reclamation projects or change of scenery guys, Going to take Power and Eklund in 21 and hopefully get Bedard or Wright in the next two years
It's not pretty, but the time to act is now after 10 years of discord. Get guys who want to play here.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,500,000
4$3,000,000
3$2,300,000
3$2,300,000
5$6,000,000
4$4,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,200,000
3$5,000,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
SEA
  1. Borgen, William [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Expansion pick
2.
BUF
  1. Addison, Calen
  2. Greenway, Jordan
  3. Rossi, Marco
  4. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (MIN)
  6. 2022 5th round pick (SJS)
MIN
  1. Eichel, Jack
  2. 2022 4th round pick (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Björnfot, Tobias
  2. Quick, Jonathan
  3. Vilardi, Gabriel
  4. 2021 1st round pick (LAK)
  5. 2023 4th round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Get first rounder back and clears depth chart up, frees up salary to get 1B option for Petersen
LAK
  1. Reinhart, Sam [RFA Rights]
  2. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
  3. 2021 6th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Swap of firsts to move up, capital to get Eklund in 2021, takes on Quick's salary for two years while UPL takes the reigns and Portillo matures
4.
BUF
  1. 2022 4th round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
4th liner with some value and gets picks back - one this year and 7th next year
DET
  1. Eakin, Cody
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (MTL)
  3. 2022 7th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Pays price to get him off roster
5.
BUF
  1. Harrington, Scott
  2. 2021 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Get bottom four puck mover if they lose Jones and acquire more picks for late first rounder
CBJ
  1. Miller, Colin
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Moves Miller out of bottom pair role and picks to move up to deal for Eklund in draft, depth D
6.
BUF
  1. Butcher, Will
  2. 2022 4th round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Defenseman besides Graves who is nasty to play against for a year and then decide, moves Butcher out and he was gone anyways
NJD
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. 2021 7th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Adams get his young D, high pick for Defenseman who will make the analytics cucks' heads explode
7.
BUF
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Rangers get rid of great top 6 forward, which they have too many of and makes room for Lafrienere and friends, get propects and picks back
NYR
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. Costantini, Matteo [Reserve List]
  3. Weissbach, Linus
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
  5. 2023 5th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Get mid career scoring threat until the draft picks pan out
8.
BUF
  1. 2022 4th round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [Reserve List]
Additional Details:
He will never sign with Sabres
9.
BUF
  1. Dunn, Vince [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 7th round pick (STL)
STL
  1. Bryson, Jacob
  2. 2021 4th round pick (BUF)
  3. 2023 6th round pick (BUF)
10.
BUF
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2022 4th round pick (VAN)
  4. 2023 5th round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Salary dumps are expensive but gets more the bottom six
VAN
  1. Girgensons, Zemgus
  2. 2022 4th round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
Swap of fourths in 2022
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$76,186,681$113,916$2,127,500$5,313,319

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,050,000$3,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$894,167$894,167
C
RFA - 4
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,200,000$4,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,822,764$2,822,764
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,633,333$1,633,333
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 18, 2021 at 5:55 p.m.
#1
did Not C that comin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 151
Likes: 28
Psst! ya'll lookin for a wild Bertuzzi? TOR fynna pay 2 1sts, what ya'll got?
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:38 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,241
Likes: 25,162
Yes, we would trade the eighth overall pick in this year's draft for the RFA rights to Sam Reinhart and the 25th overall selection. The rest of that trade is a bad joke.
irgids liked this.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:45 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 1,299
That Eichel trade is one of the first that Ive seen that makes sense in terms of a value bet but Minnesota cant fit Eichel in 2022 without dumping one of Dumba or Fiala. One almost has to be included in the trade
Bufftard716 liked this.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:50 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 1,907
Quoting: OlegP
That Eichel trade is one of the first that Ive seen that makes sense in terms of a value bet but Minnesota cant fit Eichel in 2022 without dumping one of Dumba or Fiala. One almost has to be included in the trade


Why? The original ask from Adams was 4 1st round equivalents. This is just very clearly more than that. Cap issues aside, this is too much. The market price is reportedly closer to 3 1sts now.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:56 p.m.
#5
Hit them with a toey
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 183
Likes: 85
People have been making such a big deal over Borgen/Ristolainen. They are going to give Seattle something not to take him. Also, Ristolainen is apparently worth something according to Dreger (I believe), so it is only a smart business decision to protect a guy that can get you a prospect and picks (rather than give him up for nothing).
Jul. 18, 2021 at 6:59 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Quoting: OlegP
That Eichel trade is one of the first that Ive seen that makes sense in terms of a value bet but Minnesota cant fit Eichel in 2022 without dumping one of Dumba or Fiala. One almost has to be included in the trade


I think Dumba gets moved into a side deal to a contender
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:06 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Quoting: TagesMissedShots
People have been making such a big deal over Borgen/Ristolainen. They are going to give Seattle something not to take him. Also, Ristolainen is apparently worth something according to Dreger (I believe), so it is only a smart business decision to protect a guy that can get you a prospect and picks (rather than give him up for nothing).


If Adams gives up picks (FOR A REBUILDING TEAM) to protect a D whose value is next to nothing among the analytics crowd, which I don't think he's as bad as his numbers say, he's should go back to accounting for Terry and Kim. Yes, there's a market, but what is that market for him? He's a UFA, diminished his value with his comments about not wanting play to in Buffalo or being "whatever" about it. I think Seattle takes the younger Borgen and passes on the $5M cap hit. Borgen isn't that important. Let them take him.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:12 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Yes, we would trade the eighth overall pick in this year's draft for the RFA rights to Sam Reinhart and the 25th overall selection. The rest of that trade is a bad joke.


I'm a Kings guy, too. But you want to keep Quick for two more years when we're back to making the playoffs? It's a salary dump, hence the price. Klague is coming up so we can move Bjornfoot and Byfield is ready for the No. 2 spot. And behind him we have great center depth.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:17 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Quoting: drmantalban
Why? The original ask from Adams was 4 1st round equivalents. This is just very clearly more than that. Cap issues aside, this is too much. The market price is reportedly closer to 3 1sts now.


So if the Wild are contenders, how do they dump salary? You think Kiril wants Victor Rask feeding him sauce? Why do you think Kiril doesn't want to sign there?
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:20 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 1,907
Quoting: Bufftard716
So if the Wild are contenders, how do they dump salary? You think Kiril wants Victor Rask feeding him sauce? Why do you think Kiril doesn't want to sign there?


Well the wild shouldn’t be going after Eichel to begin with, but if they do, they sure as hell aren’t paying more than 4 1sts in value. You’re literally coming back to the seller offering more than what they’re asking for, which is absurd and not how negotiations work.
OldNYIfan and Clement liked this.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:20 p.m.
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,241
Likes: 25,162
Quoting: Bufftard716
I'm a Kings guy, too. But you want to keep Quick for two more years when we're back to making the playoffs? It's a salary dump, hence the price. Klague is coming up so we can move Bjornfoot and Byfield is ready for the No. 2 spot. And behind him we have great center depth.


Salary dump? Quick gets $3 million this year and then $2.5 million in his last year.

Clague hasn't shown that he can replace Bjornfot and that's why the Kings exposed him to Seattle.

#8 for Reinhart and #25 is fair. Adding Bjornfot is a huge overpay, let alone adding Vilardi.

That package is acceptable for five years of Jack Eichel, although I personally don't like the injury risk. Sam Reinhart isn't Jack Eichel. And what if Reinhart walks after one year? What are we left with? The guy we picked in the same slot as we picked Bjornfot two years ago, which is a loss, minus Vilardi and the guy we could have had at #8. No, thanks.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 7:28 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Salary dump? Quick gets $3 million this year and then $2.5 million in his last year.

Clague hasn't shown that he can replace Bjornfot and that's why the Kings exposed him to Seattle.

#8 for Reinhart and #25 is fair. Adding Bjornfot is a huge overpay, let alone adding Vilardi.


That package is acceptable for five years of Jack Eichel, although I personally don't like the injury risk. Sam Reinhart isn't Jack Eichel. And what if Reinhart walks after one year? What are we left with? The guy we picked in the same slot as we picked Bjornfot two years ago, which is a loss, minus Vilardi and the guy we could have had at #8. No, thanks.


He definitely signs for a top six salary. Yes, he's no Eichel, but we're set at center. Vilardi won't be around when we're contenders. As far as Klague goes, Dewey had an aberration last year. His contract isn't going to age well.
As far as the picks go, the Sabres have a Pegula boner for Eklund, so if that's what they want let them. We can upgrade from Vilardi and Bjornfoot.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 10:37 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 61
Quoting: Bufftard716
I'm a Kings guy, too. But you want to keep Quick for two more years when we're back to making the playoffs? It's a salary dump, hence the price. Klague is coming up so we can move Bjornfoot and Byfield is ready for the No. 2 spot. And behind him we have great center depth.


Clague likely taken in expansion and yes, I'd love to have Quick while getting back into the playoffs.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 10:41 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: Bufftard716
So if the Wild are contenders, how do they dump salary? You think Kiril wants Victor Rask feeding him sauce? Why do you think Kiril doesn't want to sign there?


This comment isn't true! Blatant lie by Kevin weeks which wild beat writer corrected
MNCountryClub liked this.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 10:42 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 193
Likes: 10
Then why was he offered a monster contract and said no?
Jul. 18, 2021 at 10:55 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 1,907
Quoting: Bufftard716
Then why was he offered a monster contract and said no?


He doesn’t want term. It’s really just that simple.
Clement liked this.
Jul. 18, 2021 at 10:58 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: Bufftard716
Then why was he offered a monster contract and said no?


Because he wants more money. This isn't about him not wanting to sign long term. Also this leaks are coming from his agent who also created drama for leafs during mitch marner deal

Kaprizov wants to sign 3 years deal. Wild 8 but eventually they will have to meet in the middle. Kaprizov understand the cap will go up, and meaning more money for himself
Jul. 18, 2021 at 11:06 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: Bufftard716
So if the Wild are contenders, how do they dump salary? You think Kiril wants Victor Rask feeding him sauce? Why do you think Kiril doesn't want to sign there?


There hasn't been anything said about him not wanting to re-sign in MN. The only thing has been said is he (mainly his agent) hasn't liked the offers MN has given him. Long term and not near enough money: $8.5m x 8. That is a poop-ton of money to me, but below what he'd get as a 28 yo UFA on the open market in a few years.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 9:08 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 465
Likes: 226
Detroit trade is ok value-wise, but I don't see it as much of a need, considering someone like Luke Glendening or Sam Gagne could be signed for cheaper, and provide similar services.
Could take it or leave it, honestly.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll