SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Possible Starting Goalie Options Help me out

Created by: Laphill18
Team: 2021-22 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 23, 2021
Published: Jul. 23, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Which of the following moves do you all think sets Carolina up with the best chance of success? Also, what else needs to happen with these trades to realistically get them done?
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,000,000
4$5,500,000
2$3,000,000
Trades
1.
VGK
    2021 1st Round Pick
    2022 3rd Round Pick* (Moves to a 1st if Fluery re-signs in Carolina)
    Warren Foegele
    Domink Bokk
    Beck Warm
    2.
    ANA
      2021 1st Pick
      2021 3rd Pick
      2022 1st Pick
      2022 5th Pick* (If Gibson wins over 40 games in his first 2 seasons with Carolina this pick slides up to a 3rd)
      Warren Foegele
      Jesper Fast
      Joey Keane
      Jesper Sellgren
      Pyotr Kochetkov
      3.
      ARI
        2021 1st Round Pick
        2022 1st Round Pick* (If Kuemper re-signs in Carolina)
        2022 3rd Round Pick
        Jake Gardiner
        Warren Foegele
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2022
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the ANA
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CBJ
        2023
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        2024
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the CAR
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        18$81,500,000$77,973,583$0$537,500$3,526,417
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $8,460,250$8,460,250
        C
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $5,400,000$5,400,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $6,000,000$6,000,000
        C, LW
        NMC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $2,000,000$2,000,000
        RW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $4,750,000$4,750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
        RW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $725,000$725,000
        C, LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $5,300,000$5,300,000
        LD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $4,025,000$4,025,000
        RD
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        LD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $4,050,000$4,050,000
        LD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
        $3,500,000$3,500,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
        $6,400,000$6,400,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
        $3,500,000$3,500,000
        G
        UFA - 1
        $4,000,000$4,000,000
        G
        UFA - 2
        $5,500,000$5,500,000
        G
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
        $3,000,000$3,000,000
        G
        UFA - 3

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:47 a.m.
        #1
        True Reverse Retro
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2018
        Posts: 4,624
        Likes: 3,037
        Y'all should try to get that Nedeljkovic kid out of Detroit. Looks like he's coming off of a really good rookie season.
        csick, Devil, sensonfire and 3 others liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:49 a.m.
        #2
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,827
        Likes: 23,914
        Kuemper is probably the most likely bet
        LGuy54 liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:49 a.m.
        #3
        themarast
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Dec. 2020
        Posts: 873
        Likes: 38
        i like Gibson, but he had too high cap for carolina
        LGuy54 liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:50 a.m.
        #4
        Speak of the Devil
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2017
        Posts: 23,935
        Likes: 26,436
        The "Panthers" should get Nedeljkovic from Detroit
        LGuy54 liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:51 a.m.
        #5
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2020
        Posts: 9,228
        Likes: 2,961
        Gtoss. Not paying that much for a 37 year old Fleury. Vezina or not, way too old.

        Gibson hasn’t had a good season in 3 seasons. Some of it is Anaheim but his GSAA is bad too.
        LGuy54 liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:51 a.m.
        #6
        sensonfire
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2021
        Posts: 11,812
        Likes: 4,451
        The Fleury and Kuemper trades are not allowed under current NHL rules.

        Re-signing a traded player can no longer be used as a condition for trading draft picks.

        Just FYI.
        vikhodush liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:57 a.m.
        #7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2018
        Posts: 19,537
        Likes: 5,032
        1) I'd rather see them go after Lehner than Fleury.

        2) They're giving it to Andersen. That's all but been confirmed by one of the Athletic writers (Leburn I think) . They're gonna push hard to land him, and if they do, he's the starter.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
        #8
        Hurricane Waddell
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2018
        Posts: 8,733
        Likes: 3,601
        Unfortunately, I think Andersen is the most likely of the presented option. I don’t like it, but if we are talking about likely…that’s it.

        Quoting: csick
        Kuemper is probably the most likely bet
        csick and OldNYIfan liked this.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
        #9
        TOR V5 GM
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Nov. 2020
        Posts: 4,375
        Likes: 1,906
        Andersen has been linked to the canes before
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
        #10
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,827
        Likes: 23,914
        Quoting: Caniac555
        Unfortunately, I think Andersen is the most likely of the presented option. I don’t like it, but if we are talking about likely…that’s it.


        you think Mrazek is re-signed? Mrazek/Andersen tandem isnt terrible
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:04 a.m.
        #11
        Once a Kings Fan Too
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2018
        Posts: 40,253
        Likes: 25,172
        Of all of your options, note that John Gibson is the youngest and would be under team control for the longest.

        Two of Necas, Suzuki and Jarvis, Keane and your 2021 first.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:06 a.m.
        #12
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2015
        Posts: 20,030
        Likes: 12,187
        Grubauer gong to market is a legit possibility, it doesnt sound like the Avs are in a rush to lock him up before exploring all the options out there either in the market or trades
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:09 a.m.
        #13
        Hurricane Waddell
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2018
        Posts: 8,733
        Likes: 3,601
        I think the Canes would take him back, but does he want to sign for less than we was making before, and only for 1-2 years? Probably not.

        Quoting: csick
        you think Mrazek is re-signed? Mrazek/Andersen tandem isnt terrible
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:24 a.m.
        #14
        themarast
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Dec. 2020
        Posts: 873
        Likes: 38
        Quoting: csick
        you think Mrazek is re-signed? Mrazek/Andersen tandem isnt terrible


        but i think they will be injured after 4 games
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 10:27 a.m.
        #15
        KFTW
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2018
        Posts: 42,827
        Likes: 23,914
        Quoting: themarast
        but i think they will be injured after 4 games


        loooool
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 11:35 a.m.
        #16
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2017
        Posts: 6,694
        Likes: 3,362
        Lehner an option too. Seems like Freddy is a good chance to happen which I think is moronic given his last couple of years declining with injury concerns. Ned is less risky than him at this point imo.
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 12:15 p.m.
        #17
        True Reverse Retro
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2018
        Posts: 4,624
        Likes: 3,037
        I'll trade you Khudobin for a 4th Round Pick
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
        #18
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2020
        Posts: 186
        Likes: 60
        Quoting: sensonfire
        The Fleury and Kuemper trades are not allowed under current NHL rules.

        Re-signing a traded player can no longer be used as a condition for trading draft picks.

        Just FYI.

        Why did they remove this?
        Jul. 23, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
        #19
        sensonfire
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2021
        Posts: 11,812
        Likes: 4,451
        Quoting: HurricanesMan
        Why did they remove this?


        An additional obstacle that most teams felt was unfair when trading for a particular player.

        It creates an additional cost for signing said player to an extension.


        Players can be traded and then sign an extension with his new club.

        It just can't be written into the trade anymore.



        That means the team acquiring the player now needs to rely on the player acting in good faith.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll