Forums/NHL Trades

(CHI/CBJ) - Boqvist, 1st, 1st, 2nd for Jones, 1st, 6th

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jul. 25, 2021 at 1:31 p.m.
#76
pld apologist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 32
Likes: 21
****ING JARMO BABEY!
Jul. 25, 2021 at 2:56 p.m.
#77
Twitter improved
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 12,004
Likes: 8,275
Quoting: kaljakori
Nobody has ever said he isn't an NHL dman. What he isn't is a top-pairing guy, he's like a #4 who's good at PK.


That's absurd, this trade and the signing are horrible but Jones is still a top pairing defenseman.
Jul. 25, 2021 at 3:05 p.m.
#78
I heff to be mad...
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 1,196
I wonder who won?
Jul. 25, 2021 at 3:06 p.m.
#79
I heff to be mad...
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 1,196
Hands down this is a great deal for CBJ, Jones is reclining with a now 9.5 × 8 deal, while Boqvist is a great defender and seems happy to get out of Chicago
Gmonwy liked this.
Oct. 3, 2021 at 4:44 p.m.
#80
Canucks...
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,423
If the Jones extension wasn't in place, maybe I'd say this was fair value
Gmonwy liked this.
Oct. 7, 2021 at 9:08 p.m.
#81
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 410
Likes: 199
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
They traded Phil Esposito


I’m actually old enough (barely) to remember that one. Phil Esposito, Ken Hodge and Fred Stanfield – 2/3 of the top line and the 2nd line center on the best Bruins team ever – for Gilles Marotte and Pit Martin. It didn’t seem quite as bad at the time as it does in hindsight. Martin was coming off a 20-goal season and Marotte was a tough defenseman who also had some offensive skills. Hodge was only a 10-goal scorer at that point and Stanfield was a minor leaguer. Esposito’s best years were still ahead of him, but he was already clearly the best player in the deal, so I’m sure people were saying Boston won the trade as soon as it was made, but it wasn’t until we saw what those three guys did in Boston that people started calling it the worst trade ever. Chicago had enough talent to survive the trade and remain a contender for the next several years, but it helped Boston go from last place to two Stanley Cups. (They should have won more, but Montreal had an equally powerful dynasty going at the same time.)

There was no free agency or salary cap in 1967, so it’s difficult to compare that trade with today’s NHL trades. By 1967 standards Chicago won the Jones trade because they got the best player, but this was obviously a huge win for Columbus for a pending UFA who had publically announced that he wouldn’t sign an extension. (I guess what he really said was that he wouldn’t sign an extension with Columbus.) One-year rentals usually don’t fetch that much in the trade market, so Columbus must have had other suitors. Kudos to Jarmo for getting a bidding war going and getting maximum value for a lame duck asset.

A good deal for Columbus doesn’t necessarily mean a bad deal for Chicago, but to give up all those assets to acquire his rights and then turn around and sign him to a bigger contract than he would have got in free agency seems like you’re paying for him twice. Why not keep Boqvist and the draft picks and sign a guy who’s already a free agent?
Oct. 14, 2021 at 6:56 a.m.
#82
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 8,072
Likes: 7,370
Jones wasn't even the best defensemen in this trade tears of joy
Gmonwy liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:50 a.m.
#83
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 15,210
I would like to thank Stan Bowman for giving me many good assets to help the Gm Game CBJ win the cup
Gmonwy liked this.
May 19 at 12:31 a.m.
#84
I make typos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 4,039
6th overall pick, oof
palhal liked this.
May 19 at 5:41 a.m.
#85
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 48,612
Likes: 16,677
Quoting: oilersguy
6th overall pick, oof


As bad as giving up the 6th pick....so is the 9.5m X 8 contract. Jones (and Nurse) certainly wouldn't get $$$$ dollar now.
May 19 at 6:20 a.m.
#86
WentWughes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 8,072
Likes: 7,370
Quoting: palhal
As bad as giving up the 6th pick....so is the 9.5m X 8 contract. Jones (and Nurse) certainly wouldn't get $$$$ dollar now.


Neither were worth it when they signed either. They would likely get the same contract if they signed now though.
May 19 at 10:15 a.m.
#87
I make typos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 4,039
Quoting: palhal
As bad as giving up the 6th pick....so is the 9.5m X 8 contract. Jones (and Nurse) certainly wouldn't get $$$$ dollar now.


that was the price Dmen of that cailber were going for. Nurse was the best Dman in Canadian in 2020-21 btw
May 20 at 10:05 a.m.
#88
Twitter improved
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 12,004
Likes: 8,275
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
Jones wasn't even the best defensemen in this trade tears of joy


If Columbus take Nemec or Jireck (not spelled right but you know who I mean), I will agree, or in a couple years if Bovquist breaks out, but right now he still is the best in this trade.
KSIxSKULLS and dopplsan liked this.
Jul. 8 at 1:46 p.m.
#89
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 2,661
Edited Jul. 8 at 2:13 p.m.
Quoting: Saskleaf
If Columbus take Nemec or Jireck (not spelled right but you know who I mean), I will agree, or in a couple years if Bovquist breaks out, but right now he still is the best in this trade.


Jiricek it is.
Civil_Eng_PE, dk325 and Saskleaf liked this.
Jul. 8 at 7:15 p.m.
#90
Twitter improved
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 12,004
Likes: 8,275
Quoting: dopplsan


Nice.
dopplsan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit