SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Re Building Colorado

Created by: coreydox
Team: 2016-17 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2017
Published: Feb. 17, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
3.
COL
  1. Ference, Andrew
  2. 2018 2nd round pick (EDM)
4.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2018
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2019
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$57,719,167$0$1,405,000$15,280,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 7
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, C
UFA - 3
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$670,000$670,000 (Performance Bonus$55,000$55K)
RW
UFA - 2
$772,500$772,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$735,000$735,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C
UFA - 1
$640,000$640,000
C
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,437,500$2,437,500
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
$2,592,500$2,592,500
RD
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 17, 2017 at 5:48 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,702
Likes: 1,148
That St Louis trade has some major holes to it. The Avs do not want Allen. Plus, Shattenkirk will not sign with Colorado. Sakic wants younger talent for Duchene which neither player meets that criteria.
Feb. 17, 2017 at 6:17 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 462
As a Duck fan, I'd do the Landy trade. IMO, COL should ask for more. The ask for Landy was Lindholm before, which was too much. However, they should at least be looking to get Theodore in that deal. Tbh, I'd seriously consider Landeskog for Vatanen + Theodore + a pick (2nd?). Landeskog is young, a true competitor and could has that hard-nosed/sandpaper edge to his game.

Jacketsman is right though, that Duchene deal is bad for COL.
Feb. 17, 2017 at 9:49 a.m.
#3
redw1n9s
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 572
Quoting: mytduxfan
As a Duck fan, I'd do the Landy trade. IMO, COL should ask for more. The ask for Landy was Lindholm before, which was too much. However, they should at least be looking to get Theodore in that deal. Tbh, I'd seriously consider Landeskog for Vatanen + Theodore + a pick (2nd?). Landeskog is young, a true competitor and could has that hard-nosed/sandpaper edge to his game.

Jacketsman is right though, that Duchene deal is bad for COL.


Quoting: mytduxfan
As a Duck fan, I'd do the Landy trade. IMO, COL should ask for more. The ask for Landy was Lindholm before, which was too much. However, they should at least be looking to get Theodore in that deal. Tbh, I'd seriously consider Landeskog for Vatanen + Theodore + a pick (2nd?). Landeskog is young, a true competitor and could has that hard-nosed/sandpaper edge to his game.

Landeskog is barely worth Theodore straight up. Landeskog for those three is preposterous.
Feb. 17, 2017 at 11:33 a.m.
#4
Bricks_n_Sticks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
That Colorado trade is great, no way Murray sends Theodore for Landeskog, way too much of an overpay. Kase has an excellent hockey sense and would be a good add for Colorado, solid scoring top 9 prospect.
Feb. 17, 2017 at 2:42 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 910
Likes: 208
Quoting: redw1n9s
Quoting: mytduxfan
As a Duck fan, I'd do the Landy trade. IMO, COL should ask for more. The ask for Landy was Lindholm before, which was too much. However, they should at least be looking to get Theodore in that deal. Tbh, I'd seriously consider Landeskog for Vatanen + Theodore + a pick (2nd?). Landeskog is young, a true competitor and could has that hard-nosed/sandpaper edge to his game.

Jacketsman is right though, that Duchene deal is bad for COL.


Quoting: mytduxfan
As a Duck fan, I'd do the Landy trade. IMO, COL should ask for more. The ask for Landy was Lindholm before, which was too much. However, they should at least be looking to get Theodore in that deal. Tbh, I'd seriously consider Landeskog for Vatanen + Theodore + a pick (2nd?). Landeskog is young, a true competitor and could has that hard-nosed/sandpaper edge to his game.

Landeskog is barely worth Theodore straight up. Landeskog for those three is preposterous.


Theodore won't be leaving any time soon. If anyone is leaving it will be Vatanen + Pettersson + a draft pick for Landy. Kase will be staying put. Murray knows what he has in that kid and you have to balance out the team with older vets and younger players.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll