SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns to DET Meier to NJD and a Simek Khudobin Swap

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 24, 2021
Published: Jul. 24, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
2$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,900,000
1$3,000,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Stecher, Troy
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (WSH)
2.
3.
SJS
  1. Severson, Damon
  2. Zacha, Pavel
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$70,697,029$0$212,500$10,802,971

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,700,000$1,700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:28 p.m.
#1
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,925
Likes: 26,426
Devils wouldn't do Severson for Meier 1 for 1. Adding Zacha and a 2nd makes it worse
palhal liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:29 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 632
habs sign danault for that
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:30 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,294
Likes: 1,325
No from NJ and DET. Meier is not that much better than Zacha and we're definitely not including a 26 yo top 4 dman. If I were to guess any Meier deal would revolve around prospects and picks. Looking at ur roster now, why don't u guys just blow it all up?
DeadWingsv2, aedoran and BStinson liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:33 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,996
Likes: 730
Quoting: jrdroge25
No from NJ and DET. Meier is not that much better than Zacha and we're definitely not including a 26 yo top 4 dman. If I were to guess any Meier deal would revolve around prospects and picks. Looking at ur roster now, why don't u guys just blow it all up?

Meier's a whole lot better than Zacha.

SJ should ask for Mercer plus a 1st or simply just Holtz if prospects/picks are the only things coming back.

As far as blowing it all up, SJ should do this, Doug Wilson knows this too -- he's not an idiot. It's just that our roster's blow-it-up-proof at the moment -- way too many longterm contracts left with clauses that just make it impossible to do so. No choice but to try to be competitive while at the same time trying to 'rebuild on the fly'.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:34 p.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,072
Likes: 22,465
Wings don't want 8m X 4 years Burns anymore than the Sharks. Burns high restrictive M NTC kills the deal. Heck Seattle didn't want him.
DeadWingsv2, aedoran and BStinson liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:39 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
laugh laugh You'd have to pay us to take on Burns contract, Not the other way around. Burns is too old for our rebuild timeline.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#7
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,925
Likes: 26,426
Quoting: CheechYou
Meier's a whole lot better than Zacha.

SJ should ask for Mercer plus a 1st or simply just Holtz if prospects/picks are the only things coming back.

As far as blowing it all up, SJ should do this, Doug Wilson knows this too -- he's not an idiot. It's just that our roster's blow-it-up-proof at the moment -- way too many longterm contracts left with clauses that just make it impossible to do so. No choice but to try to be competitive while at the same time trying to 'rebuild on the fly'.


Devils would never do Mercer +1st or Holtz for Meier. Meier is getting so overvalued
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:41 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,162
Likes: 7,845
Maybe if the sharks send Burns to Detroit with nothing in return and half salary retained we will take him..... Maybe
It would only happen if we could find another team that wants him for $2M and we get enough back to justify retaining 2M for 4 years.
RedWing9119 and aedoran liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:42 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,162
Likes: 7,845
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
laugh laugh You'd have to pay us to take on Burns contract, Not the other way around. Burns is too old for our rebuild timeline.


I don't even think they have the assets to pay us to take him, they would have to give up a bunch of firsts, they don't really have any good prospects.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:45 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,599
Likes: 18,153
Quoting: CheechYou
Meier's a whole lot better than Zacha.

SJ should ask for Mercer plus a 1st or simply just Holtz if prospects/picks are the only things coming back.

As far as blowing it all up, SJ should do this, Doug Wilson knows this too -- he's not an idiot. It's just that our roster's blow-it-up-proof at the moment -- way too many longterm contracts left with clauses that just make it impossible to do so. No choice but to try to be competitive while at the same time trying to 'rebuild on the fly'.


Which is exactly why Meier is being shopped at a discount.

The return would be nothing close to this package.
There will be no Mercer, Holtz, Foote or any other top prospects included.
Nor guys like Severson....or Smith, or Hughes, or Hischier, or Bratt, or Sharangovich.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 2:59 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Quoting: palhal
Wings don't want 8m X 4 years Burns anymore than the Sharks. Burns high restrictive M NTC kills the deal. Heck Seattle didn't want him.


Burns was protected from Seattle
CheechYou liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 1,284
Quoting: Lancebmx
I don't even think they have the assets to pay us to take him, they would have to give up a bunch of firsts, they don't really have any good prospects.


I'll take Eklund for that contract. Lol.
aedoran liked this.
Jul. 24, 2021 at 3:03 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,162
Likes: 7,845
Quoting: RedWing9119
I'll take Eklund for that contract. Lol.


Still need to retain lol
RedWing9119 and aedoran liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll