Forums/NHL Trades

(BOS/CGY) - Vladar for 2022 3rd RD pick

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jul. 28 at 5:59 p.m.
#1
Trade confirmed: Boston Bruins - Calgary Flames
Trade Details
Boston Bruins Acquire:
Boston Bruins
2022 3rd round pick (CGY)
Sum: $0$0$0
Change: $0
Change: -$750,000
Change: -$200,000
Calgary Flames Acquire:
Calgary Flames
Daniel Vladar · $0$750,000$200,000 (AHL/JR)
Sum: $0$750,000$200,000
Change: $0
Change: +$750,000
Change: +$200,000
TheFlamesFanatic25 liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:00 p.m.
#2
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 6,371
Likes: 3,831
I wish Sakic wouldve done this. Vladar would be a good number 3 for this year and potentially replace Francouz/Kuemper/whoever-the-Avs-trade-for next year
Pond_Duck, aadoyle, Tntpod and 2 others liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:01 p.m.
#3
Always in Pain
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 22,113
Likes: 13,997
BOS would've lost Vladar to waivers so this was a smart move. Good value for Flames as a 2G.
Maniac23, KubaH, Tntpod and 3 others liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:01 p.m.
#4
Y u heff to be mad?
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 164
Likes: 34
We'll miss you, Darth Vladar.
ConnorMcHellebucyk, beantownboy17, Tntpod and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:01 p.m.
#5
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 218
Make sense for Boston to trade him, he’s the 3-4th goalie if you count rask but I wish we could have get a 2nd or someting but still, love seeing you play vlady have fun and be good
Missouri and BCAPP liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:02 p.m.
#6
hi imma guy
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 107
Likes: 82
Fair
Jul. 28 at 6:02 p.m.
#7
Phil
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 25
Likes: 28
Boston gets their third back, Calgary gets a 3G. Works for me!
Jul. 28 at 6:05 p.m.
#8
sensonfire
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 1,513
If Colorado only paid a 6th round pick for Jonas Johansson, then that's what Calgary should have paid for Vladar.

I voted for the Boston Bruins.
oilersguy liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:12 p.m.
#9
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,876
Likes: 3,417
Fair deal. Valdar at worst is am NHL back-up with good size at 6'5. Still a little raw, but has the upside of a solid 1B
Jul. 28 at 6:18 p.m.
#10
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 5,898
Quoting: Philmil
Boston gets their third back, Calgary gets a 3G. Works for me!


Will probably be our backup TBH
Philmil liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:23 p.m.
#11
v5 CBJ GM
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 6,501
Likes: 6,373
Boston wins, Vladar is not worth a 3rd
Jul. 28 at 6:32 p.m.
#12
Go Flames Go!
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 49
I guess we love czech goalies a lot... The trade is not bad though, i hope he is gonna be a great backup
Gmonwy liked this.
Jul. 28 at 6:43 p.m.
#13
I make Articals.
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 938
Likes: 243
Good deal
I voted fair.
Jul. 28 at 6:45 p.m.
#14
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 989
Likes: 261
I honestly didn't expect Vladar to fetch a 3rd, if Vladar pans out then it's fair but for right now edge to BOS
Jul. 28 at 6:54 p.m.
#15
FREDDY SZN
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 4,380
Likes: 4,440
Guess this is the Flames backup plan. Great for the Bruins to acquire a 3rd round pick for him since they could've lost him on waivers a few months ago.
Jul. 28 at 7:32 p.m.
#16
The Darkest Timeline
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,021
Likes: 4,149
I mean I dont think vladar is ready just yet but I guess it's now or never with this deal. It's too bad theycouldnt stash him in Providence 1 more year.
Jul. 28 at 7:51 p.m.
#17
Let's go Pens!
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 343
Remember this trade, guys. One day you'll all see it as a STEAL.
luckyguessiguess liked this.
Jul. 28 at 10:35 p.m.
#18
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,153
Likes: 2,569
Quoting: moli92
I wish Sakic wouldve done this. Vladar would be a good number 3 for this year and potentially replace Francouz/Kuemper/whoever-the-Avs-trade-for next year


Quoting: moli92
I wish Sakic wouldve done this. Vladar would be a good number 3 for this year and potentially replace Francouz/Kuemper/whoever-the-Avs-trade-for next year


He's waivers eligible. I suspect someone with an injury in training camp would take him when someone Colorado tried to waive him. I suppose they have the cap room to just carry him as a third goalie but at this stage of development you want him playing
Jul. 29 at 9:51 a.m.
#19
Oui non grille-pain
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 6,357
Likes: 1,728
You CGY fans are gonna love Vladar; he should have no trouble beating Werner out for the backup spot.

I really don't like this from BOS's standpoint; I think they should've trusted Swayman as the starter and Vladar as the backup. I guess they figured one young goalie was enough, but they could've gotten a little more for Vladar imo.
Jul. 30 at 3:38 p.m.
#20
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 223
Likes: 44
By vlader good luck
Oct. 12 at 10:26 p.m.
#21
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 5,898
Well... He was lights out in training camp. I enjoyed watching him play.
Nov. 21 at 11:19 p.m.
#22
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 5,898
Quoting: Gmonwy
Well... He was lights out in training camp. I enjoyed watching him play.


And regular season. Last 2 games he has started Flames won by a combined score of... 8-0. He also has a. 933 and a 1.96. Pretty good numbers.
capsfan2121 and Saskleaf liked this.
Nov. 22 at 1:25 p.m.
#23
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,517
Likes: 1,926
Quoting: Gmonwy
And regular season. Last 2 games he has started Flames won by a combined score of... 8-0. He also has a. 933 and a 1.96. Pretty good numbers.

sample size so small i wouldnt exactly judge a deal based on 5 regular season games. buoyed heavily by shutouts vs the sens (lol) and bruins (b2b after not playing in a full week).
Nov. 22 at 1:47 p.m.
#24
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 4,172
Quoting: hanson493
sample size so small i wouldnt exactly judge a deal based on 5 regular season games. buoyed heavily by shutouts vs the sens (lol) and bruins (b2b after not playing in a full week).

Not sure why you're trying to justify Calgary having any sort of advantage yesterday. Calgary was on the second half of a back to back as well, and the several days of rest would have only benefited Boston. Calgary was also playing their 3rd game in 4 nights, all on the road, with travel, and Boston had home ice advantage. There was honestly no reason for Calgary to win that game yesterday, but Vladar played well and they did. Yes it's a small sample size, but there's no denying that he's been good so far, and he's played well against some good teams, generally on the second half of a back to back, where the Flames are at best in the same situation as their opponent, usually at a disadvantage (beat Washington and Boston, only let in 2 goals against Toronto, secured the win against New Jersey and Ottawa like you want your backup to do).
Nov. 22 at 3:41 p.m.
#25
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 4,517
Likes: 1,926
Quoting: Alfie11
Not sure why you're trying to justify Calgary having any sort of advantage yesterday. Calgary was on the second half of a back to back as well, and the several days of rest would have only benefited Boston. Calgary was also playing their 3rd game in 4 nights, all on the road, with travel, and Boston had home ice advantage. There was honestly no reason for Calgary to win that game yesterday, but Vladar played well and they did. Yes it's a small sample size, but there's no denying that he's been good so far, and he's played well against some good teams, generally on the second half of a back to back, where the Flames are at best in the same situation as their opponent, usually at a disadvantage (beat Washington and Boston, only let in 2 goals against Toronto, secured the win against New Jersey and Ottawa like you want your backup to do).


boston played a back to back after not playing any hockey in a week. that extended rest doesnt help anybody getting any rhythm, or solid ice legs. ask guys if theyd rather play 4 in 7 or 3 in 8 where games 1 and 2 are 6 days apart.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit