if Vatanen's being brought in, Kulak's being traded. If Bozak's being brought in, 2 forwards are getting traded. You can't just avoid trades.

You're right, some guys may be traded if we bring them in. I think Kulak can stay that 7th D for depth and doesn't need to be moved. Wideman can play in AHL and be brought up if need be.

On offense, yes probably someone will have to be moved or we risk losing a guy to waivers. I just think we need that help, a veteran presence, at center and Bozak can play that role.

G

I definitely agree with you on the point of Bozak. He would be a good addition as a vet presence at centre. However, the problem I have with that is that it blocks Poehling. Sure, Bozak would be a solid addition, but Poehling could make a really good push into training camp.

And I also agree with your point of "G". Very insightful.

Understood and I agree. I would like Poehling to have a role next year and maybe Bozak takes Evans place or even KK on the second line. I think he can just be plugged in if ever any of the young guys are struggling and at a one year deal it's worth it just to get that depth. I think he has more value over Paquette at C.

As for me writing "G" it's just my way of finishing the comment, not sure why that's odd, but thanks for the comment.

G