You think an expansion team is giving up a first for a rental number 3 d man? Cmon…

Value and fit aside, if you think Mo is anything other than a top pair OFD you're delusional.

rielly is a top 2 on that team all day everyday lol

On that team, yes he is. Doesn’t change his standing in the league, or his value, which is not nearly what you have it pegged out as.

I think he was a couple years ago. Last two years he hasn’t been the same guy. He’s young so he could totally bounce back to what he was, which was a 2, but right now he’s playing like a 3.

MIN would decline. I do think Robertson will be solid, but not at the price of Greener and a 3rd.

Just because a guy isn't in the Norris conversation doesn't mean he isn't top pair lmao.

It also shows your utter lack of evaluation skills as the last time you thought he was good was because of a shooting percentage spike.

You’re talking about a shooting percentage spike and talking about someone else’s lack of evaluation skills? Jesus Christ dude. That’s sad. He hasn’t played well over the last two years. Shaky in his own end. Gap control has been really bad. Puck retrieval has been okay, but i think he has a confidence issue because his decision making after puck retrieval isn’t what it used to be.

Watch a bit, it’s pretty obvious.

this guy literally thinks there are only like 25 top pairing defenders in the league

tell me you havent watched morgan rielly play in the past 2 years without telling me you havent watched morgan rielly play in the past 2 years

you really gotta stop trading Robertson for 3rd liners and then putting those 3rd liners on the top line

You don’t have to tell me you’re, shall we say, a leafs loyalist, who’s vision may be slightly impaired. Your posting history says as much.

I disagree! I’d take that offer and run!!

I think you’d be hard pressed to find 64 guys who are better than Rielly. And I’m by no means a fan of his, but gotta be realistic and if you’re saying he’s a second pair guy that means there are literally 64 guys in the league you’d take over him on D. Admittedly I haven’t ranked the top 65 dmen in the league today but I’m fairly confident he’d be in the top 65.

They are linked to Rielly for FA so trading not and extending him for 8 years saves some cap. The 1st would be protected I guess for top 3 (lottery I guess since they don't prospects being a 1st year) and then should be better next year anyway

he's in the top 40 without even doing the list, im pretty confident.

IMO, MIN could deal Greenway at TDL with 50% retained and garner a better package. I would consider this closer to the floor of his trade value than the ceiling. If he has a good season, which I think he will, it may be as high as a 1st coming back.

I might be giving too much value to Robertson here. I thought he was still a top 10ish prospect, but now see his development has stalled a bit.
How would you value a Greenway for Krebs deal? What would need to be tweaked to make it equitable for both teams?