SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is Monahan actually available

Created by: BruinsFan35
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 27, 2021
Published: Aug. 27, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
BOS
  1. Monahan, Sean
Additional Details:
3rd balances out Moore, who needs to move due to Boston’s cap with Monahan. DeBrusk and a 2023 first for Monahan I think is fair
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Moore, John
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (CGY)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,579,841$1,956,507$182,500$920,159
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 27, 2021 at 7:25 a.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,708
Likes: 31,448
Not without a C going back to Flames I'd say.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 7:27 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel
Tkachinla and Gofnut999 liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 9:38 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
This is a decent trade. Moore isnt a cap dump (or at least not a 3rd rounder lol) he has been injured the past 2 years
But its still a decent trade that the bruins may accept, maybe
Aug. 27, 2021 at 9:39 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel


Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen
Aug. 27, 2021 at 9:49 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 406
I feel it's if the Bruins accept.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
#6
Buljujarvi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 2,552
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel


i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 10:14 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 410
Likes: 138
As a Flames fan, I think the value is fair. The concern would be losing a #2C and not having a replacement ready. Backlund could move up, but then still a gap.
If this was next year and Zary or Pelltier were ready to move up, Id make this move.
Gmonwy and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 10:26 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Value seems right, but that leaves CGY with a hole at center. Have to think they only move Monahan if it means they're acquiring a guy like Eichel (to @Ledge_And_Dairy point)
Tkachinla and Gofnut999 liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 10:54 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 401
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.


The point Ledge is making here is that CGY shouldn’t trade Monahan unless they are targeting a second trade that improves them at C. Nowhere on this site in the history of ever has anyone tried to say Monahan is on par with Eichel.

CGY should definitely be exploring options to upgrade over Monahan, and CGY has the assets to be a top bidder for Eichel. Monahan would have to move to make that deal work. Unfortunately, I think Treliving is also thinking that keeping Monahan and hoping he can play a full season without injury will improve his value — and he’d also be a decent 2C.

Flames fans want to see more change for the roster, however. And rightly so.
ConnorMcHellebucyk liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 11:08 a.m.
#10
Buljujarvi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 2,552
Quoting: Tkachinla
The point Ledge is making here is that CGY shouldn’t trade Monahan unless they are targeting a second trade that improves them at C. Nowhere on this site in the history of ever has anyone tried to say Monahan is on par with Eichel.

CGY should definitely be exploring options to upgrade over Monahan, and CGY has the assets to be a top bidder for Eichel. Monahan would have to move to make that deal work. Unfortunately, I think Treliving is also thinking that keeping Monahan and hoping he can play a full season without injury will improve his value — and he’d also be a decent 2C.

Flames fans want to see more change for the roster, however. And rightly so.


i think all these eichel trades have broken me to the point that i belived someone else i respect a lot thinks that eichel is on par with monahan lmao
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 11:42 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,652
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen


Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 11:49 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Quoting: Gofnut999
Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.


Don't even bother with that clown. Seriously just do yourself a favor and add them to the ignore list. They act like they know everything and then get defensive when someone doesn't agree with them. Instead of defending there point they just try and insult people. Ironically enough they lack "logic" lol
Ledge_And_Dairy and vikhodush liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.


I never said Monahan returns Eichel, I said Monahan is not available ubless Calgary is getting Eichel
Aug. 27, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen


?

What are you even talking about?
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.


Quoting: ON3M4N
Don't even bother with that clown. Seriously just do yourself a favor and add them to the ignore list. They act like they know everything and then get defensive when someone doesn't agree with them. Instead of defending there point they just try and insult people. Ironically enough they lack "logic" lol


Lmao
so why are yall making bruins acgms if he is only going to the sabres. whats the point, yall are wrong anyway then.
Point is this kid still is a clearly biased Flames fan

and again, as has been proven multiple times: I am the one that is pointing out that people can have their own opinions, I am the one that is being shat on for having Wagner on the 4th line, which is where I think he will play and is a good opinon, people can disagree, but if they are going to be rude and tell me im dumb beause I think a 4th liner should play on the 4th line, I will tell them to f off.

Dont join the ranks of the rude people on this website. Its not worth it.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 5:14 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
?

What are you even talking about?


god you shoul;d probably learn hockey before coming here lmaoooo
Aug. 27, 2021 at 5:18 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
Quoting: LogicOnly
god you shoul;d probably learn hockey before coming here lmaoooo


Learn to think before you can start typing? I've said multiple times now, Flames have zero reason to trade Monahan to add a winger to their 3rd line.

You always talk about logic but never actually have any yourself. Tell me why Calgary should make this trade?
ON3M4N, Gofnut999, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person liked this.
Aug. 27, 2021 at 5:42 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,294
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i think all these eichel trades have broken me to the point that i belived someone else i respect a lot thinks that eichel is on par with monahan lmao


I dont blame you there lol
Aug. 27, 2021 at 5:42 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Learn to think before you can start typing? I've said multiple times now, Flames have zero reason to trade Monahan to add a winger to their 3rd line.

You always talk about logic but never actually have any yourself. Tell me why Calgary should make this trade?


Does LogicOnly.....

A. Ask why your so defensive
B. Tell you to make an ACGM
3. Throw out a weak attempt at an insult

popcorn
Aug. 27, 2021 at 11:15 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,652
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao
so why are yall making bruins acgms if he is only going to the sabres. whats the point, yall are wrong anyway then.
Point is this kid still is a clearly biased Flames fan

and again, as has been proven multiple times: I am the one that is pointing out that people can have their own opinions, I am the one that is being shat on for having Wagner on the 4th line, which is where I think he will play and is a good opinon, people can disagree, but if they are going to be rude and tell me im dumb beause I think a 4th liner should play on the 4th line, I will tell them to f off.

Dont join the ranks of the rude people on this website. Its not worth it.


Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️
gretzkyghosts, vikhodush and ON3M4N liked this.
Aug. 28, 2021 at 4:08 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Well thsts clearly not true
Sep. 9, 2021 at 4:25 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 4,562
Quoting: Gofnut999
Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Facts lol. I don't think I've ever seen someone get so defensive over the suggestion of a 4th liner....its actually mind blowing to me.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll