Edited Aug. 30, 2021 at 3:42 p.m.
Quoting: RedWing9119
Awww I'm sorry mister literal. Perhaps your dumba*s should look up hyperbole in the dictionary.
Look @ HypotheticalImpossibility post and look at yours. See the difference? One is an adult, the other is... well, you.
I asked a LEGITIMATE question, he answered without making stupid childish personal comments like "
I'm sorry I told you no. I can imagine how rough that must be for you"
lol you're the posterboy as to why it's extremely difficult to communicate on the internet as you take it to a stupid EMO LEVEL right away.
Yes I then laughed at you, because frankly that's all there was to take away from your reply and now you just come up with more insults.
Oh and I just saw the end of that post that I initially skipped "
Doesn't change the fact that we have better prospects"
Well, you can keep believing that but every "source" I have seen had the Sens pool over the Wings pool by a comfortable margin. I also have seen polls in NHL forums where people were voting for the Sens over the Wings, again pretty comfortably.
Any argument outside of your opinion?
Quoting: RedWing9119
Two? Yeah ok chief. Thanks for your uninformed assessment of our defensive depth and over valuation of Brannstrom. But is there a reason you're so defensive and upset about it?
What am I defensive and upset about exactly? lol read my answer to the other adult (HypotheticalImpossibility). It was 100% rational. That's what I care about, talk about hockey rationally. I am not the one making it "emo"...
Quoting: RedWing9119
I mean you could just say you disagree with me without the insults. Do you think that helps you win the argument? Because it just makes you look defensive.
Wait... You're now playing the victim? hahahaha
Frankly, I knew it was coming before reading your answer. It's totally "your type". Throws a jab, gets demolished then cries to mommy as the victim.
I am not defensive. I am literally laughing at you.
I don't care about "winning" this argument. I have myself said that the Wings had 2 better D prospects than Brannstrom. If you think there's more, name them as I am still quite curious.