HELL NO !!!!! Those pics go the other way

?? Perron is a ppg on a team thats offense is infinitely worse idk what your on but can i smoke some

Is Perron two first round picks (they might be closer to seconds but still) better than Kilorn? Not sure I buy that

I wouldn’t do Killorn for Perron straight up, especially as he’s a rental. This is maddening. They don’t need him at that cost. This is absurd.

Remember, Coleman and Goodrow spent most of tenures in Tampa in the bottom 6 and Tampa paid Nolan Foote, two firsts, and a third for them so essentially three firsts for guys on the bottom 6.

This deal is slightly different since Killorn actually has a ton value considering his special teams play and his leadership. This would be like the Isles trading Anders Lee and two firsts. Just doesn't make a lot of sense in the context of the team. Perron is a great player and a steal of a contract by the Blues, but I just don't see this deal working out considering the context for Tampa.

Yeah that’s my point. I don’t get this trade for Tampa. For either team really.

You're probably these guy who says Buffalo 2mds is closer to firsts i hate peoplea making that argument a late first is closer to a 2md stop.its a friggin 1st amd ds are seconds

And you’re one of those guys that doesn’t even understand which side of the argument I’m making. Clown show.

Don't care what side of am
Argument you're on
1's are 1's and.2's are 2's saying a 1 is more like a 2 is frigging moronic

You're delusional

It was literally a passing comment and you’re focused on the difference between a 32 and 33 pick lol. Talk about moronic.

I rarely point out the differences in late versus early round picks and in this situation it was such a throw away comment but your pea brain couldn’t get past it.

After seeing this comment your other responses make much more sense. Anybody who thinks Perron and two firsts are what it takes to acquire Kilorn doesn’t know much about hockey.