SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which of these three teams would be willing to take on some of Tarasenkos salary

Created by: sensonfire
Team: 2021-22 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2021
Published: Sep. 9, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
Trades
1.
STL
    The purpose of this would be to allow the St. Louis Blues to trade Tarasenko to another team.
    DET
      The structure of the trade would be a three-way trade.


      Something like with what happened with David Savard.
      2.
      STL
      ARI
        St. Louis would be responsible for 50% of Tarasenko's salary and 3.75 million of his cap hit.


        The team acquiring Tarasenko would be responsible for 25% of his salary and 1.875 million of his cap hit.


        The team that serves as a third-party would be responsible for the other 25%.
        3.
        STL
        ANA
          The team that serves as a third party would get a couple of draft picks for taking on a portion of Tarasenko's salary over two years.

          Maybe 2 fourth round picks.

          One pick from the blues and the other from the team that acquires Tarasenko.
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2022
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          2023
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          2024
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          Logo of the STL
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          23$81,500,000$72,093,849$306,349$0$9,406,151
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $4,500,000$4,500,000
          LW, RW
          NTC
          UFA - 5
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $1,875,000$1,875,000
          C
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $3,750,000$3,750,000
          RW
          NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $4,000,000$4,000,000
          RW, LW
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $6,500,000$6,500,000
          C, LW
          NTC
          UFA - 7
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $5,800,000$5,800,000
          LW, RW, C
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $2,000,000$2,000,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $2,750,000$2,750,000
          RW, C
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $1,000,000$1,000,000
          LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $2,250,000$2,250,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $2,800,000$2,800,000
          RW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 2
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $6,500,000$6,500,000
          LD
          NTC
          UFA - 6
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $6,500,000$6,500,000
          RD
          NTC
          UFA - 6
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $6,000,000$6,000,000
          G
          NTC
          UFA - 6
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $5,500,000$5,500,000
          RD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $750,000$750,000
          G
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $3,275,000$3,275,000
          LD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $1,375,000$1,375,000
          RD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $787,500$787,500
          LD
          UFA - 1
          ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $900,000$900,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $750,000$750,000
          RD
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the St. Louis Blues
          $725,000$725,000
          LD
          UFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Which of these three teams would be willing to take on some of Tarasenko's salary to allow him to be traded
          The chart has been hidden

          Poll Options


          Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:39 p.m.
          #1
          did Not C that comin
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2021
          Posts: 151
          Likes: 28
          Zona needs loaded team for 34 in '24
          sensonfire liked this.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:39 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Apr. 2019
          Posts: 7,903
          Likes: 6,400
          Arizona 100%
          sensonfire liked this.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:45 p.m.
          #3
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Sep. 2020
          Posts: 5,590
          Likes: 3,002
          The Savard deal was a 4th for $200.000 for a month a half. $1.8 million for two years will be much more expensive and Detroit already have Pánik on retention for two years. There are only 3 rentention slots available at any one time and Detroit will need the only two they have left for their own players this trade deadline.

          Unless you wave a couple of first rounders under our nose it'll be a definitive no from Detroit.
          Lancebmx liked this.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:45 p.m.
          #4
          nhlnathan
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2021
          Posts: 517
          Likes: 122
          i dont mind arizona or detroit but he probably doesnt waive for any of these teams if i had to pick one it would be Anahime i dont think they would mind improving their roster a bit too maybe get their younger players a little playoff experience
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:52 p.m.
          #5
          Thread Starter
          sensonfire
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2021
          Posts: 11,947
          Likes: 4,483
          Quoting: nathanallan
          i dont mind arizona or detroit but he probably doesnt waive for any of these teams if i had to pick one it would be Anahime i dont think they would mind improving their roster a bit too maybe get their younger players a little playoff experience


          Neither of these three teams would be getting Tarasenko.


          They would be getting a couple of picks for taking on roughly 25% of his salary.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 8:01 p.m.
          #6
          Thread Starter
          sensonfire
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2021
          Posts: 11,947
          Likes: 4,483
          Quoting: Billy12Bob
          The Savard deal was a 4th for $200.000 for a month a half. $1.8 million for two years will be much more expensive and Detroit already have Pánik on retention for two years. There are only 3 rentention slots available at any one time and Detroit will need the only two they have left for their own players this trade deadline.

          Unless you wave a couple of first rounders under our nose it'll be a definitive no from Detroit.


          This trade for Tarasenko would happen when all three teams involved in the trade are on board (i.e. the trade deadline).


          We're also talking about cap space that likely wouldn't be used at all during this season other than to facilitate a trade involving Tarasenko.



          No team is ever going to get a couple of first round picks just to serve as a third-party in a trade with two other teams.

          Full stop.

          Don't be greedy.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 8:09 p.m.
          #7
          Jinx god
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Sep. 2019
          Posts: 10,205
          Likes: 13,730
          Everyone is saying the Yotes, but realistically that last retention spot is going to Kessel. Because:

          1. It's his last year on his contract and he's obviously not re-signing
          2. Kessel half retained has way more value than Kessel full contract
          3. For the Tarasenko retention the highest they'll get is maybe a 3rd while Kessel can maybe get a 1st
          Billy12Bob, sensonfire and Lancebmx liked this.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 8:22 p.m.
          #8
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Sep. 2020
          Posts: 5,590
          Likes: 3,002
          Quoting: sensonfire
          This trade for Tarasenko would happen when all three teams involved in the trade are on board (i.e. the trade deadline).


          We're also talking about cap space that likely wouldn't be used at all during this season other than to facilitate a trade involving Tarasenko.



          No team is ever going to get a couple of first round picks just to serve as a third-party in a trade with two other teams.

          Full stop.

          Don't be greedy.


          This has nothing to do with cap space.

          This has everything to do with the cap on retention slots.

          Detroit have 5 players on expiring contracts that they possibly have to trade at the deadline, several of which may very well need to have salary retained to be traded for the right return.

          They are NOT going to give up one of the only two retention slots they have for two years for a couple of 4th round picks. Detroit needs those retention slots for their own trades.
          Dcochy liked this.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 8:46 p.m.
          #9
          Thread Starter
          sensonfire
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2021
          Posts: 11,947
          Likes: 4,483
          Quoting: Billy12Bob
          This has nothing to do with cap space.

          This has everything to do with the cap on retention slots.

          Detroit have 5 players on expiring contracts that they possibly have to trade at the deadline, several of which may very well need to have salary retained to be traded for the right return.

          They are NOT going to give up one of the only two retention slots they have for two years for a couple of 4th round picks. Detroit needs those retention slots for their own trades.


          Then, make sure to vote for either Anaheim or Arizona.
          Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:25 p.m.
          #10
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2020
          Posts: 10,731
          Likes: 8,298
          Don't think Arizona will, two retention slots used already with one long term. Last one probably saved for Kessel.
          Detroit has one used already with a bunch of UFAs that could be traded with retention. So it would have to be a significant payment.
          Anaheim might or maybe San Jose or Columbus.
          Buffalo and Ottawa could be candidates as well. Buffalo still needs to hit the cap floor and likely could use some more pieces for the rebuild.
          I wouldn't see any team taking two fourths for retention though, minimum probably a second round pick at least four three two years of retention.
          sensonfire liked this.
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Loading animation
          Submit Poll Edit