SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who adds here

Created by: Bdawwwgy1
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2021
Published: Sep. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$925,000
Trades
EDM
  1. Olofsson, Victor
Additional Details:
Edmonton having trouble negotiating with Yamo and have a 2x4.7 extension with Olofsson worked out
BUF
  1. Yamamoto, Kailer [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,421,968$669,339$907,500$78,032
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,050,000$3,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 16, 2021 at 4:30 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 520
Likes: 246
Straight up seems fair
villenash and mk458 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
It's not close. Olofsson has zero value to Edmonton. He's 4 years older and he SUCKS at 5v5 scoring, can't defend, isn't physical, etc.

It's not a question of who adds, this isn't a trade Edmonton considers for a second.
oilersguy, hockeyconnor97, SadlyAnOilFan and 2 others liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#3
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 928
Olofsson is 4 years older, but he's more established and the better goal scorer as of now. Yamamoto is much younger and has a higher ceiling, and probably creates more offense and works harder. If I'm the Oilers I'd probably just keep Yams, but value is close I guess
oilersguy liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 4:49 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
Quoting: mk458
Olofsson is 4 years older, but he's more established and the better goal scorer as of now. Yamamoto is much younger and has a higher ceiling, and probably creates more offense and works harder. If I'm the Oilers I'd probably just keep Yams, but value is close I guess


Olofsson only scores on the PP though, and Yamamoto doesn't get PP time in Edmonton (neither would Olofsson) so we can't say who is the better scorer on the PP. At 5v5 (by far the largest game state) it's Yamamoto without a contest - Olofsson is one of the worst 5v5 goal scorers in the league. He's really bad, and it's because he's a perimeter player who won't go to the high danger areas.

naturalstattrick.com/playercompare

The value isn't close.
Ausbear17 and mk458 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 4:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
...
Sep. 16, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,974
Likes: 18,307
Not sure I'd be giving Olofsson $4.7m
Sep. 16, 2021 at 5:44 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
From an oilers perspective I’m more against the 4.7 than the 1-1 swap. I like yams work ethic and think he had a higher ceiling but if I was to bet on which could help Edmonton more this coming season I’m sorry I have my doubts about yam.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 5:49 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
Quoting: Timmah007
From an oilers perspective I’m more against the 4.7 than the 1-1 swap. I like yams work ethic and think he had a higher ceiling but if I was to bet on which could help Edmonton more this coming season I’m sorry I have my doubts about yam.


The numbers are clear for Olofsson - I posted a link in post #4. There's no comparison AT ALL - Yamamoto is the better player - and I haven't even touched defensive metrics yet.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 6:38 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Quoting: CD282
The numbers are clear for Olofsson - I posted a link in post #4. There's no comparison AT ALL - Yamamoto is the better player - and I haven't even touched defensive metrics yet.


Haha I knew you’d comment on that one. I still really like the concept of a second pp unit that is good enough to justify cutting down a bit of the top units time. It would be nice to be able to roll the top line right back out there after the pp could catch a tired pk unit even if they get the change it could prevent a momentum swing that often comes from a killed penalty.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 6:44 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
Quoting: Timmah007
Haha I knew you’d comment on that one. I still really like the concept of a second pp unit that is good enough to justify cutting down a bit of the top units time. It would be nice to be able to roll the top line right back out there after the pp could catch a tired pk unit even if they get the change it could prevent a momentum swing that often comes from a killed penalty.


The Oilers had the best powerplay in 40 years and you want to change it up and cut the first units ice time. Yeah, I don't follow the logic.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:04 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Quoting: CD282
The Oilers had the best powerplay in 40 years and you want to change it up and cut the first units ice time. Yeah, I don't follow the logic.


Haha I know. Just a different approach that will improve 5-5 numbers.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 7:56 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,966
Likes: 7,727
Quoting: Timmah007
Haha I know. Just a different approach that will improve 5-5 numbers.


No it won't though. The way to improve 5v5 numbers is to get better 5v5 players in the bottom-6, which is what Holland is trying to do.

Acquiring Olofsson works directly against that as he's a poor 5v5 player.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll