SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next off season if Bs disappoint

Created by: CmackX12
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2021
Published: Sep. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
These are some moves I would like to see happen if the bruins disappoint this year. Some moves could happen at TDL or in the off season. Start to transition into the Eichel-Pasta-Mcavoy era and get younger without a full rebuild.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,000,000
3$1,200,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$1,000,000
2$900,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$5,500,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2022 6th round pick (DAL)
2.
BOS
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (TBL)
OTT
  1. Haula, Erik
Additional Details:
Any team looking for a depth C
3.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (WSH)
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (WSH)
WSH
  1. Forbort, Derek
Additional Details:
Any team that is looking for a big defender and will pay for him
4.
BUF
  1. Beecher, John
  2. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
  3. Zboril, Jakub [RFA Rights]
  4. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
  6. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
  7. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
  8. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$81,898,334$0$150,000$601,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167
RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,200,000$1,200,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:14 p.m.
#1
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
BOS
2022 2nd round pick (TBL)
OTT
Haula, Erik
Additional Details:
Any team looking for a depth C

I don't mind Haula, but he's not worth a 2nd, not even a TBL 2nd.
UBS_ARENA and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:14 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
Buffalo declines the eichel deal, too much quantity not enough quality. You wont get eichel in any deal if the best piece going out is a likely late 1st in this draft.
Also forbort will require assets to move. Nobodys paying for an overpaid 6/7 dman.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:16 p.m.
#3
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 12,203
Likes: 4,595
Haula is not worth a 2nd.

Please see his trade history for more details.
Shibbal18 and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Buffalo declines the eichel deal, too much quantity not enough quality. You wont get eichel in any deal if the best piece going out is a likely late 1st in this draft.
Also forbort will require assets to move. Nobodys paying for an overpaid 6/7 dman.


Seeing as this ACGM appears to be next year, that means Eichel's NMC kicked in. Assuming it has, he controls where he goes and with (more than likely) very few options, the value could lower for BUF. Not saying this gets it done, but if they let his NMC kicks in then they're playing with fire like Hall all over again
Sep. 16, 2021 at 7:57 p.m.
#5
Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 3,211
Quoting: ON3M4N
Seeing as this ACGM appears to be next year, that means Eichel's NMC kicked in. Assuming it has, he controls where he goes and with (more than likely) very few options, the value could lower for BUF. Not saying this gets it done, but if they let his NMC kicks in then they're playing with fire like Hall all over again

Jack still only gets to Veto a trade he doesn’t like. He can’t force a trade. Eventually if he wants out badly enough he accepts whatever trade the Sabres make just to get out. They still don’t have to negotiate with a team they don’t want to trade him to. Sure, it’s kind of bad faith, but he hasn’t exactly earned the right to force them to make a bad deal even then. Not to mention it’s not the same situation as Taylor Hall. He had an expiring contract where they lose him for nothing if they don’t move him. Jack has a five-year deal, and no way out of it.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 8:01 p.m.
#6
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Sabres decline and Eichel will be gone so thats a double no
sabres89 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 8:04 p.m.
#7
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
Seeing as this ACGM appears to be next year, that means Eichel's NMC kicked in. Assuming it has, he controls where he goes and with (more than likely) very few options, the value could lower for BUF. Not saying this gets it done, but if they let his NMC kicks in then they're playing with fire like Hall all over again


Not sure how the Hall trade has anything in common with a theoretical Eichel to Boston trade, aside from the logos next to the names. Youre grasping at straws, its completely nonsensical
sabres89 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2021 at 9:12 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Tjm220
Jack still only gets to Veto a trade he doesn’t like. He can’t force a trade. Eventually if he wants out badly enough he accepts whatever trade the Sabres make just to get out. They still don’t have to negotiate with a team they don’t want to trade him to. Sure, it’s kind of bad faith, but he hasn’t exactly earned the right to force them to make a bad deal even then. Not to mention it’s not the same situation as Taylor Hall. He had an expiring contract where they lose him for nothing if they don’t move him. Jack has a five-year deal, and no way out of it.


Quoting: Shibbal18
Not sure how the Hall trade has anything in common with a theoretical Eichel to Boston trade, aside from the logos next to the names. Youre grasping at straws, its completely nonsensical


FFS they both have a NMC and once Eichel's kicks in he calls the shots like Hall did. It's really not hard to grasp. Do they have to move him? No, but its pretty clear he wants out.... so why is Buffalo going to keep a guy around whose making a large amount of money but didn't want to be there? Why keep him around if he's not committed to the team and could be a distraction? Is Buffalo really going to hold onto a guy for 5yrs just so they don't lose a trade? No because that's awful management. Then again it's Buffalo and they'd be dumb enough to do it.

Again if Buffalo let's his NMC kick in then they are playing with fire
Sep. 16, 2021 at 9:43 p.m.
#9
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
FFS they both have a NMC and once Eichel's kicks in he calls the shots like Hall did. It's really not hard to grasp. Do they have to move him? No, but its pretty clear he wants out.... so why is Buffalo going to keep a guy around whose making a large amount of money but didn't want to be there? Why keep him around if he's not committed to the team and could be a distraction? Is Buffalo really going to hold onto a guy for 5yrs just so they don't lose a trade? No because that's awful management. Then again it's Buffalo and they'd be dumb enough to do it.

Again if Buffalo let's his NMC kick in then they are playing with fire


Hall had 2 months left before he left for nothing, i dont know how to break it down any further. If Eichel veto's a trade to Calgary because he wants to go to Boston, Kevyn Adams can say "fine" and let him waste 4 years. If Eichel wants out, hes probably not going to be vetoing trades, therefore it isnt in the same universe as the Hall trade. this isnt hard to comprehend, but keep clinging to your shred of hope FFS
Sep. 16, 2021 at 9:53 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
Quoting: ON3M4N
Seeing as this ACGM appears to be next year, that means Eichel's NMC kicked in. Assuming it has, he controls where he goes and with (more than likely) very few options, the value could lower for BUF. Not saying this gets it done, but if they let his NMC kicks in then they're playing with fire like Hall all over again


Yeah its true but they arent moving eichel for a package with the best asset being a late 1st. Theyre going to need a premium piece in any package that has a chance.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 7:12 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Shibbal18
Hall had 2 months left before he left for nothing, i dont know how to break it down any further. If Eichel veto's a trade to Calgary because he wants to go to Boston, Kevyn Adams can say "fine" and let him waste 4 years. If Eichel wants out, hes probably not going to be vetoing trades, therefore it isnt in the same universe as the Hall trade. this isnt hard to comprehend, but keep clinging to your shred of hope FFS


Ha I've said multiple times on this site I don't see Eichel going to Boston, so your cling to hope comment is pointless lol

Also if BUF let's Eichel sit around for 4 years half assing it because he won't accept a trade they want, then that'll be funny as hell. Then again the circus that is the Sabres is a good laugh year around. Eichel wants out, Dahlin still isn't signed and their #1OA pick would rather play in the NCAA this year than Buffalo 🤣 (before you get angry, I do expect Owen to sign with Buffalo at some point).
Sep. 17, 2021 at 7:14 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Yeah its true but they arent moving eichel for a package with the best asset being a late 1st. Theyre going to need a premium piece in any package that has a chance.


And in my post to you I even said "Not saying this gets it done".....so what are you even trying to argue with your post?
Sep. 17, 2021 at 9:39 a.m.
#13
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
Ha I've said multiple times on this site I don't see Eichel going to Boston, so your cling to hope comment is pointless lol

Also if BUF let's Eichel sit around for 4 years half assing it because he won't accept a trade they want, then that'll be funny as hell. Then again the circus that is the Sabres is a good laugh year around. Eichel wants out, Dahlin still isn't signed and their #1OA pick would rather play in the NCAA this year than Buffalo 🤣 (before you get angry, I do expect Owen to sign with Buffalo at some point).


No even better, he'll go to Russia. Thats better then setting a standard that your going to dump players at a discount just to get rid of them. Thats what killed Botterill and Pegula doesnt want to get embarrassed again. The Sabres arent dumping him to get rid of him, thats the last thing they will do, and the Sabres fan base fully supports that
Sep. 17, 2021 at 10:02 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Shibbal18
No even better, he'll go to Russia. Thats better then setting a standard that your going to dump players at a discount just to get rid of them. Thats what killed Botterill and Pegula doesnt want to get embarrassed again. The Sabres arent dumping him to get rid of him, thats the last thing they will do, and the Sabres fan base fully supports that


That's a very cut off your nose to spite your face thinking. Which is probably why the Sabres haven't sniffed the playoffs in 10 years and have been a perennial cellar dweller.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 10:14 a.m.
#15
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
That's a very cut off your nose to spite your face thinking. Which is probably why the Sabres haven't sniffed the playoffs in 10 years and have been a perennial cellar dweller.


i mean trade Eichel for a bunch of bottom 6 players they already have a ton of, or let him rot to make a statement. Kind of a no brainer
Sep. 17, 2021 at 12:54 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Shibbal18
i mean trade Eichel for a bunch of bottom 6 players they already have a ton of, or let him rot to make a statement. Kind of a no brainer


Lol hell of a statement to future FA and your own players. Who said anything about bottom 6 players btw?
Sep. 17, 2021 at 12:56 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
Quoting: ON3M4N
And in my post to you I even said "Not saying this gets it done".....so what are you even trying to argue with your post?


Nobodys arguing its a conversation, relax bro. No need to get all uptight about someone making a point which you said you agree with. Maybe go on a walk or go for a swim or something. Jesus christ.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:08 p.m.
#18
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
Lol hell of a statement to future FA and your own players. Who said anything about bottom 6 players btw?


Oh sorry current bottom 6 player, a bust, and then a future bottom 6 player, with a bunch of late picks that are statistically, overwhelmingly likely to become bottom 6 players
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:17 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Shibbal18
Oh sorry current bottom 6 player, a bust, and then a future bottom 6 player, with a bunch of late picks that are statistically, overwhelmingly likely to become bottom 6 players


If you're taking about op's offer, I've said multiple in here it doesn't get it done laugh
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Nobodys arguing its a conversation, relax bro. No need to get all uptight about someone making a point which you said you agree with. Maybe go on a walk or go for a swim or something. Jesus christ.


I'm not uptight at all haha.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
Quoting: ON3M4N
I'm not uptight at all haha.


LMAOOOOOO not uptight.

Quoting: ON3M4N
And in my post to you I even said "Not saying this gets it done".....so what are you even trying to argue with your post?
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
LMAOOOOOO not uptight.


Nope just asked a question. Funny with everything I've said both you a Shib were more focused on the return op had.... which again in my very first post said it didn't get it LMAO
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:43 p.m.
#23
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,610
Likes: 9,209
Quoting: ON3M4N
Nope just asked a question. Funny with everything I've said both you a Shib were more focused on the return op had.... which again in my very first post said it didn't get it LMAO


You didnt offer a counter so what other context would we have 🤔
Not that i was even focusing on the return itself, just saying his nmc doesnt mean Buffalo will sell him for less
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:49 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 4,580
Quoting: Shibbal18
You didnt offer a counter so what other context would we have 🤔
Not that i was even focusing on the return itself, just saying his nmc doesnt mean Buffalo will sell him for less


Why would I counter when I don't think he'd be traded to Boston LMAO. If you don't think he'll fetch a lesser return if/when his NMC kicks in then you'll be disappointed. Right now he can be traded anywhere, so more bidders. When the NMC kicks in he can shrink that significantly and less bidders hurts Buffalo. As it is no one's coming close to what Buffalo wants lol.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 9:39 p.m.
#25
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Bump mcavoy a couple mill up.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll