Quoting: MarcBergevin69
Ferrell has Gaudreau upside. He could also be a bust. I just wanted to add him in cause he could end up being a crucial part of our future.
I agree he could be
But at his Size with his level of Conditional it will be an uphill battle in the NCAA(plan season around Weekends and Holidays)
That said if he puts in the work Gaudreau did anything is possible keeping in mind he went to one of if not The Top NCAA program taking full advantage of it
His Conditioning was Elite
Farrell is playing for Harvard where the focus is on Education and Ted Donato is their highest accomplished American Born/Developed Prospect.
They've had Success with Killorn,Sweeney, and D.Moore who all were developed in Canada but no consistency with US born players for Decades.
If you told me Farrel was playing in Massachusetts i'd be a lot more optimistic as its the toughest division in the NCAA with the best prospects produced at their schools.
They put so much into Hockey there and no one else really does outside Minnisota and Michigan at the volume they invest.
Its the difference between OHL and WHL production of stars. Where OHL has Gretzky,Mcdavid,Stevie Y , & Brodeur(not including OHA it replaced Hull,Orr,Espisito,Makita,Mahovlich,ext)
Compared to WHL's Sakic,Price ,B.Clarke & B.Trottier which is good but not on OHL's level of Greatness Produced
Farrell would have been best off going the Patrick Kane route opting out of NCAA for OHL where he hit another level all together becoming undisputed #1 OA pick with a fantastic run with Gagner ,Kostitsyn and S.Mason. Find him a good team to play on in a system like London Knights with a history of Producing All Star level Talent and the sky is the limit for Farrell