SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Win Now

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 20, 2021
Published: Sep. 20, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$64,033,464$452,439$3,690,000$17,466,536
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$307,500$308K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$997,500$997,500
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 20, 2021 at 6:01 p.m.
#1
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 2,843
I definitely like this approach, I can't see all performance bonuses being hit, but I see this as a great chance to win. Not sure if Anaheim accepts, but it's an idea.
Wadejos123 liked this.
Sep. 20, 2021 at 8:51 p.m.
#2
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
I don’t think that’s enough for that package. I will admit I don’t know a lot about CHI’s prospects so I referred to Pronman who doesn’t rate Beaudin highly and doesn’t even rate Borgstrom. Strome is a solid piece tho.

So right now Rakell should return a late first but it’d be a ‘22 first. So let’s say Borgstrom, and the ‘23 pick is enough for Rakell. That leaves Strome, Beaudin and a 3rd for Lindholm and that’s not enough.
Sep. 20, 2021 at 11:19 p.m.
#3
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
Quoting: Jah1722
I don’t think that’s enough for that package. I will admit I don’t know a lot about CHI’s prospects so I referred to Pronman who doesn’t rate Beaudin highly and doesn’t even rate Borgstrom. Strome is a solid piece tho.

So right now Rakell should return a late first but it’d be a ‘22 first. So let’s say Borgstrom, and the ‘23 pick is enough for Rakell. That leaves Strome, Beaudin and a 3rd for Lindholm and that’s not enough.


Pronman says the most with the least amount of research done. Can’t stand him.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 1:37 a.m.
#4
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: PreemoForGM
Pronman says the most with the least amount of research done. Can’t stand him.


That’s fine. Beaudin is still not a top prospect and the ducks still pass.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 9:02 a.m.
#5
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
Quoting: Jah1722
That’s fine. Beaudin is still not a top prospect and the ducks still pass.


That’s fine it’s an overpayment.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 9:20 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,280
Likes: 4,924
Quoting: Jah1722
I don’t think that’s enough for that package. I will admit I don’t know a lot about CHI’s prospects so I referred to Pronman who doesn’t rate Beaudin highly and doesn’t even rate Borgstrom. Strome is a solid piece tho.

So right now Rakell should return a late first but it’d be a ‘22 first. So let’s say Borgstrom, and the ‘23 pick is enough for Rakell. That leaves Strome, Beaudin and a 3rd for Lindholm and that’s not enough.


I don't think Rakell returns a 1st right now, let alone a 1st+. He had what like 28 pts last year? What makes you say he's worth a 1st+?
Sep. 21, 2021 at 1:09 p.m.
#7
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: Wadejos123
I don't think Rakell returns a 1st right now, let alone a 1st+. He had what like 28 pts last year? What makes you say he's worth a 1st+?


When you move the 1st back a year that value is less you have to add to it. And yes right now he’s worth a late first. Foligno got a 1st during an awful season for ~20 games.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 1:11 p.m.
#8
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: PreemoForGM
That’s fine it’s an overpayment.


It’s not even close to an overpayment. There’s only 2 decent pieces the return and Lindholm alone could return more than that.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 1:44 p.m.
#9
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
Quoting: Jah1722
It’s not even close to an overpayment. There’s only 2 decent pieces the return and Lindholm alone could return more than that.


So giving up your best defensive prospect, a 2c, best center prospect, probable mid 1st round pick, and Connolly for an overhyped dman atm and a third liner is not an overpayment? yeah gotcha. Not to mention Lindholm puts the hawks further into cap hell. So yeah definitely not an overpayment again. Go back to trolling board if you think Lindholm is going to bring in an amazing franchise altering return like you’re hoping for. Sorry not sorry Anaheim sucks to suck.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 1:52 p.m.
#10
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: PreemoForGM
So giving up your best defensive prospect, a 2c, best center prospect, probable mid 1st round pick, and Connolly for an overhyped dman atm and a third liner is not an overpayment? yeah gotcha. Not to mention Lindholm puts the hawks further into cap hell. So yeah definitely not an overpayment again. Go back to trolling board if you think Lindholm is going to bring in an amazing franchise altering return like you’re hoping for. Sorry not sorry Anaheim sucks to suck.


Lol that’s not their best d prospect and he’s not highly rated even if he is. That’s not their best C prospect and he’s not highly rated even if he is. Connolly is a cap dump.

It’s funny that you call Lindholm an overhyped Dman when he would be the best Dman on CHI by quite a bit.

Also you really should go seek help if you get this mad on a hockey forum. It’s not good for you.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 2:13 p.m.
#11
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
Quoting: Jah1722
Lol that’s not their best d prospect and he’s not highly rated even if he is. That’s not their best C prospect and he’s not highly rated even if he is. Connolly is a cap dump.

It’s funny that you call Lindholm an overhyped Dman when he would be the best Dman on CHI by quite a bit.

Also you really should go seek help if you get this mad on a hockey forum. It’s not good for you.


What you can’t handle the truth? Did trolling not pan out they way you wanted it? I’m sorry to hurt your feelings. Please don’t report me because I know it’s all you have left at this point. Unless you want to keep acting silly?
Sep. 21, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
#12
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: PreemoForGM
What you can’t handle the truth? Did trolling not pan out they way you wanted it? I’m sorry to hurt your feelings. Please don’t report me because I know it’s all you have left at this point. Unless you want to keep acting silly?


Nothing you’ve stated is close to the truth. Beaudin isn’t their top D prospect. Borgstrom is 24. He’s not really even a prospect anymore.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 4:12 p.m.
#13
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
Quoting: Jah1722
Nothing you’ve stated is close to the truth. Beaudin isn’t their top D prospect. Borgstrom is 24. He’s not really even a prospect anymore.


The thing about opinions…
Sep. 21, 2021 at 4:42 p.m.
#14
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: PreemoForGM
The thing about opinions…


I mean when everyone shares the same opinion is it really opinion then? Mitchell is their best D prospect.
Sep. 21, 2021 at 11:37 p.m.
#15
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 388
D=M/V

Big brain joke don’t hurt yourself.
Sep. 22, 2021 at 10:24 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,280
Likes: 4,924
Quoting: Jah1722
When you move the 1st back a year that value is less you have to add to it. And yes right now he’s worth a late first. Foligno got a 1st during an awful season for ~20 games.


I feel like I say this all the time but one GM making a questionable trade doesn't set a new precident that every GM has to pay that much too. Foligno also have a leadership type of role to him that Rakell doesn't have. It's really not the same situation at all. Plus Jarmo is Jarmo, if you know what I mean. He only wins trades
Sep. 22, 2021 at 2:59 p.m.
#17
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,416
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: Wadejos123
I feel like I say this all the time but one GM making a questionable trade doesn't set a new precident that every GM has to pay that much too. Foligno also have a leadership type of role to him that Rakell doesn't have. It's really not the same situation at all. Plus Jarmo is Jarmo, if you know what I mean. He only wins trades


You have to take into account recent trade history for similar players. If the team trading the player doesn’t they will lose every trade.

Rakell still produces chances at a pretty high rate. It’s the finishing that has sunk his point total. When he scored 30 goals his shooting% was 18.6 and 14.8. Since then he hasn’t even hit 10%. If he got to 10% he would score 20+. I think a team will see the chances and think he can still produce goals which is why a late 1st should still be the ask.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll