SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Now is true

Created by: Obus777
Team: 2021-22 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 6, 2021
Published: Oct. 6, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Lindholm, Hampus ($1,200,000 retained)
  2. Rakell, Rickard ($1,789,444 retained)
ANA
  1. Byron, Paul
  2. Lehkonen, Artturi
  3. Primeau, Cayden
  4. Romanov, Alexander
  5. 2022 2nd round pick (MTL)
  6. 2022 3rd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Byron for salary dump
2.
MTL
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (PIT)
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$65,095,283$597,561$837,500$16,404,717
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$673,695$673,695
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,402,778$1,402,778
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 5
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 6, 2021 at 10:56 a.m.
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Ducks have no interest in Byron, Lehkonen or Primeau (with two excellent goalie prospects of our own) and Kings have absolutely no interest in Kulak. Kings are the team that would make an offer for Romanov.
TZ11 liked this.
Oct. 6, 2021 at 11:03 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 509
Likes: 45
LA i dont hâve a good défense. Hé need help and for 2x 3rd is not overpaid for a Guy is plat 18-20 min / game

Anaheim is two Rental players. And after Gibson thé goalies is not good depth. If i pay more a little is ok. But 2 rentable dont forgot this .
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct. 6, 2021 at 11:28 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,947
Quoting: Obus777
LA i dont hâve a good défense. Hé need help and for 2x 3rd is not overpaid for a Guy is plat 18-20 min / game

Anaheim is two Rental players. And after Gibson thé goalies is not good depth. If i pay more a little is ok. But 2 rentable dont forgot this .


Yes, but it's likely that at least Lindholm gets traded with an extension. Primeau would be the 4th best goalie the Ducks have right now and isn't needed. Lehkonen doesn't have much if any value to the Ducks. Byron is a cap dump and one of the two picks would be have to be added just to take his contract. And that would mean the Ducks are trading their two best trade chips for Romanov, a goalie prospect they don't need and a pick that isn't a 1st. Ducks decline.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Oct. 6, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Quoting: Obus777
LA i dont hâve a good défense. Hé need help and for 2x 3rd is not overpaid for a Guy is plat 18-20 min / game

Anaheim is two Rental players. And after Gibson thé goalies is not good depth. If i pay more a little is ok. But 2 rentable dont forgot this .


It appears to me that English is not your first language. Therefore, I and my fellow Los Angeles and Anaheim fans appreciate and admire your efforts to communicate your knowledge and opinions to us. Thank you!

I do not disagree that Brett Kulak is worth two third-round picks. But Los Angeles has two veteran defensemen on the left side -- Alex Edler and Olli Maatta -- and three young defensemen on the way up -- Mike Anderson, Tobias Bjornfot and Kale Clague. Therefore, Brett Kulak would be an unnecessary "extra" for us.

Yes, Rakell and Lindholm are two rental players. But Rakell with 50% retention should be worth the Montreal second and a good useful prospect, and as my knowledgeable friend @TZ11 says, Primeau is not a a prospect at a useful position for us (Roman Durny is better and Lukas Dostal is expected to be a LOT better). Lindholm is an excellent player and should return a first-round pick and a useful prospect. Romanov and the third is an acceptable alternative, but if this trade is done at the deadline 3/4 of the way through the season, either Romanov would have shown NHL ability (in which case, why would Montreal trade him?) or disappointed (in which case, why would Anaheim want him?). In my opinion, Lindholm with retention for Romanov and the third is an exchange that makes more sense NOW than at the trade deadline.

Thank you again for looking at our Southern California teams!
Oct. 6, 2021 at 1:28 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 509
Likes: 45
Gibson hé ask a Trade question of Time. And Primeau is thé best prospect G
But. For 2 rental another Time he tell

Lindholm is injury problème

But is just for fun smile
Oct. 6, 2021 at 1:32 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 509
Likes: 45
Thank. I am french Guy

Romanov i Trade him for présent is a young guy but for win Now i need a rendy guy
2 rnd. Romanov. + prospect B. For lindholml
Lehkonen +primeau + another 2 2024 ok. And byron for dump
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll