Quoting: Obus777
LA i dont hâve a good défense. Hé need help and for 2x 3rd is not overpaid for a Guy is plat 18-20 min / game
Anaheim is two Rental players. And after Gibson thé goalies is not good depth. If i pay more a little is ok. But 2 rentable dont forgot this .
It appears to me that English is not your first language. Therefore, I and my fellow Los Angeles and Anaheim fans appreciate and admire your efforts to communicate your knowledge and opinions to us. Thank you!
I do not disagree that Brett Kulak is worth two third-round picks. But Los Angeles has two veteran defensemen on the left side -- Alex Edler and Olli Maatta -- and three young defensemen on the way up -- Mike Anderson, Tobias Bjornfot and Kale Clague. Therefore, Brett Kulak would be an unnecessary "extra" for us.
Yes, Rakell and Lindholm are two rental players. But Rakell with 50% retention should be worth the Montreal second and a good useful prospect, and as my knowledgeable friend
@TZ11 says, Primeau is not a a prospect at a useful position for us (Roman Durny is better and Lukas Dostal is expected to be a LOT better). Lindholm is an excellent player and should return a first-round pick and a useful prospect. Romanov and the third is an acceptable alternative, but if this trade is done at the deadline 3/4 of the way through the season, either Romanov would have shown NHL ability (in which case, why would Montreal trade him?) or disappointed (in which case, why would Anaheim want him?). In my opinion, Lindholm with retention for Romanov and the third is an exchange that makes more sense NOW than at the trade deadline.
Thank you again for looking at our Southern California teams!