SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

both of em

Created by: Wqrrior
Team: 2021-22 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 13, 2021
Published: Oct. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Peart, Jack [Reserve List]
  2. Rask, Victor ($1,875,000 retained)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. 2022 4th round pick (WPG)
NYR
  1. Lodnia, Ivan
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (MIN)
  3. 2022 5th round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$79,173,086$0$982,500$2,326,914
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$917,831$917,831
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 13, 2021 at 3:20 a.m.
#1
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Too low though on both

Drury's not dumb enough to sell that low, right?

Right😐😬
Wqrrior and ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 3:22 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 1,239
Pretty good value for both, but extending them will be a challenge next summer
Wqrrior liked this.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 3:30 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
Quoting: Radu47
Too low though on both

Drury's not dumb enough to sell that low, right?

Right😐😬


Well Krav is kinda in that position where he has to make something out of this year or he's a bust. Im treating his value similarly to Lias Andersson, which was a higher 2nd. Krav is often overrated on this website, but especially with him not making the team or reporting to camp, he isn't going to retrieve a high offer any more. Strome has the general consensus of a 2nd 3rd in value. Peart was a 2nd last year. Rask doesn't impact the value but provides an extra forward and the cap difference to make it go through.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 3:39 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,295
Teams selling players =/= teams are going to accept bad offers
Oct. 13, 2021 at 4:18 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Teams selling players =/= teams are going to accept bad offers


https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/lias-andersson

These guys were drafted a year apart and a year has surpassed since the Lias trade. Krav has had no more NHL impact than Lias. So how come he's worth so much more? Especially since centers generally carry more value. Even more given Gorton's track record is higher than Drury's.

I will acknowledge that the Chicago value might be short, since I figured Peart carried more value. Maybe he isn't as good as I approximated.
EccE liked this.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 5:06 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,295
Quoting: Wqrrior
https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/lias-andersson

These guys were drafted a year apart and a year has surpassed since the Lias trade. Krav has had no more NHL impact than Lias. So how come he's worth so much more? Especially since centers generally carry more value. Even more given Gorton's track record is higher than Drury's.

I will acknowledge that the Chicago value might be short, since I figured Peart carried more value. Maybe he isn't as good as I approximated.

Lias situation is a fair bit different, he was bust territory and couldnt crack a roster on a rebuilding team with minimal to no depth at forward. Kravitsov got cut from a team rounding the corner to competing and has decent forward depth. Clearly he wasn't good enough to crack the top 6 (yet) and wasnt versatile enough to adapt to the bottom 6. That and they didnt want to put Hajak on waivers.

As for Strome that is more the trade I was referring to. That does nothing for Chicago at all, they've made it quite clear they want to compete so selling Strome for futures and a cap dump makes no sense. Chicago needs defensively strong PKing forwards, Rask is not that
Oct. 13, 2021 at 9:14 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 520
Likes: 246
Quoting: EccE
Pretty good value for both, but extending them will be a challenge next summer


Yeah Kravstov's 950K will be a real struggle.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 1,239
Quoting: RagBolts
Yeah Kravstov's 950K will be a real struggle.


We would have $16 million to sign a goalie, a defenseman and 6 forwards. Kravtsov's qualifying offer will be $1 017 500, and we would not be able to go a lot higher from there.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 12:11 p.m.
#9
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 304
Would have to have Rossi or Boldy in Kravtsov deal
Oct. 13, 2021 at 12:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 3,118
Quoting: AFox23
Would have to have Rossi or Boldy in Kravtsov deal


🤣🤣🤣🤣

Not a chance in hell...

Are you trolling? Why on earth would the Wild send the Rangers back a much better prospect for a lesser prospect that not only refused to report to the AHL but then promptly demanded a trade? Don't be biased, you sound ridiculous and absurd.
Wqrrior and MNBassman liked this.
Oct. 13, 2021 at 2:31 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
Quoting: AFox23
Would have to have Rossi or Boldy in Kravtsov deal


Krav isn't anywhere close to that value, wake up.
MNBassman liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll