SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

lines for game 2

Created by: newman23
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 14, 2021
Published: Oct. 14, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
gonna be another season of losing a lot of games 5-4
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$66,029,214$452,439$3,415,000$15,470,786
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$997,500$997,500
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 14, 2021 at 1:22 a.m.
#1
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 2,843
It's really early, and I thought they settled in well after the 1st 10 minutes. My biggest takeaway is Johnson and Jones were equally terrible. Jones had some good looks on the power play, but that was about it. Johnson is not better than Suter and Kampf. I have no idea what he's doing in the top 6 or the 1st PP unit. The package traded for Jones should've net the Hawks Werenski. De Haan doesn't fit on this team, they have enough defensive defensemen. It's going to be a long few years for this team if Jones continues to regress.
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 2:04 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: NickC1988
It's really early, and I thought they settled in well after the 1st 10 minutes. My biggest takeaway is Johnson and Jones were equally terrible. Jones had some good looks on the power play, but that was about it. Johnson is not better than Suter and Kampf. I have no idea what he's doing in the top 6 or the 1st PP unit. The package traded for Jones should've net the Hawks Werenski. De Haan doesn't fit on this team, they have enough defensive defensemen. It's going to be a long few years for this team if Jones continues to regress.


Its Really Early, too soon to judge Jones and Johnson so harshly currently. Give them a chance.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 2:07 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,028
Likes: 9,330
Quoting: NickC1988
It's really early, and I thought they settled in well after the 1st 10 minutes. My biggest takeaway is Johnson and Jones were equally terrible. Jones had some good looks on the power play, but that was about it. Johnson is not better than Suter and Kampf. I have no idea what he's doing in the top 6 or the 1st PP unit. The package traded for Jones should've net the Hawks Werenski. De Haan doesn't fit on this team, they have enough defensive defensemen. It's going to be a long few years for this team if Jones continues to regress.


Agree on Johnson especially. Couldn't help but think what Suter would have offered or even Strome centering Kane and Debrincat.

Jones looks okay, not great not bad per se. He needs to settle in to a new system and pairings but is very unlikely they we ever look back at that trade and say he didn't overpay in the trade and didn't overpay with the extension. Would have been much better to grab Lindholm for a fraction of the cost of Jones in a trade and extension and kept BoQ. BoQ+ Lindholm is better then 1 Jones.
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 8:12 a.m.
#4
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,642
Likes: 9,754
@NickC1988 @ChiHawk @Aussie_Blackhawk

Those two didn't have good games for sure. Jones first 10 min was REALLY bad, but he settled in. I know this will sound like Blasphemy, but I thought Kaner had the worst game. 1 shot in the 1st 40 min and zero scoring opportunities made in the 1st 40 min. He'll obviously come around, but if you need a 6 on 4 to create opportunities then you're doing something wrong. He looked disinterested to me...which if you're scoring, fine. When your not it gets noticed.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:44 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,028
Likes: 9,330
Quoting: exo2769
NickC1988 ChiHawk Aussie_Blackhawk

Those two didn't have good games for sure. Jones first 10 min was REALLY bad, but he settled in. I know this will sound like Blasphemy, but I thought Kaner had the worst game. 1 shot in the 1st 40 min and zero scoring opportunities made in the 1st 40 min. He'll obviously come around, but if you need a 6 on 4 to create opportunities then you're doing something wrong. He looked disinterested to me...which if you're scoring, fine. When your not it gets noticed.


Agree that Kane looked pretty bad and disinterested and obviously this isn't the first time we've seen this from him recently.
exo2769 and Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 6:22 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 662
Quoting: NickC1988
It's really early, and I thought they settled in well after the 1st 10 minutes. My biggest takeaway is Johnson and Jones were equally terrible. Jones had some good looks on the power play, but that was about it. Johnson is not better than Suter and Kampf. I have no idea what he's doing in the top 6 or the 1st PP unit. The package traded for Jones should've net the Hawks Werenski. De Haan doesn't fit on this team, they have enough defensive defensemen. It's going to be a long few years for this team if Jones continues to regress.


I'm willing to give some time to johnson and jones to let them bed in. Theyre talented players and theyll find their groove with some consistent line mates. We just continue to look a step behind on defensive transitions and colliton has not improved that part of our game since we became coach
Oct. 14, 2021 at 6:23 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 662
Quoting: exo2769
NickC1988 ChiHawk Aussie_Blackhawk

Those two didn't have good games for sure. Jones first 10 min was REALLY bad, but he settled in. I know this will sound like Blasphemy, but I thought Kaner had the worst game. 1 shot in the 1st 40 min and zero scoring opportunities made in the 1st 40 min. He'll obviously come around, but if you need a 6 on 4 to create opportunities then you're doing something wrong. He looked disinterested to me...which if you're scoring, fine. When your not it gets noticed.


at least the powerplay looks lethal. kane will pick it up he always does
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll