SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This makes too much sense to me

Created by: HappyKampfers
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 16, 2021
Published: Oct. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Kerfoot seem like a well liked playier among the team. Maybe mvoing him while also shedding a bit of cap is a good thing in a weird way.
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
    Hawks get a better player in kerfoot and engvall right now for 2 players that arent playing and twam wants out atleast for strome
    CHI
      Leafs get younger and maybe wake the team up or something and both players are rfa. Strome from ontario and nylander brother duo
      3.
      TOR
        As a base to the trade. Other pieces from each side if you want a bigger trade
        CHI
        Retained Salary Transactions
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2022
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        2023
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        2024
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the TOR
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        22$81,500,000$80,512,241$0$400,000$987,759
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $2,500,000$2,500,000
        LW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $11,640,250$11,640,250
        C
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $10,903,000$10,903,000
        RW
        UFA - 4
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $11,000,000$11,000,000
        C, LW
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $6,962,366$6,962,366
        RW
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $950,000$950,000
        LW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $1,250,000$1,250,000
        RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        C
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $900,000$900,000
        RW, LW
        NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $750,000$750,000
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
        $874,125$874,125
        RW, LW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $750,000$750,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
        $3,000,000$3,000,000
        C
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $5,625,000$5,625,000
        LD
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $5,000,000$5,000,000
        LD/RD
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $3,800,000$3,800,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $5,000,000$5,000,000
        LD
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $2,000,000$2,000,000
        RD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $1,650,000$1,650,000
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        LD/RD
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
        RD
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $894,167$894,167
        LD
        UFA - 1
        ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
        Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
        $1,645,000$1,645,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
        #1
        Bedard23
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2021
        Posts: 9,256
        Likes: 4,439
        If Engvall can keep his current pace up for 10 games or longer Chicago possibly considers this
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
        #2
        Ovchinnikov 137
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 10,412
        Likes: 11,982
        You definitely need to change this, way too one sided for the Leafs:
        Strome > Kerfoot
        Nylander > Engvall
        Beetlejuice and exo2769 liked this.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:21 p.m.
        #3
        Ovchinnikov 137
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 10,412
        Likes: 11,982
        Quoting: IconicHawk
        If Engvall can keep his current pace up for 10 games or longer Chicago possibly considers this


        Consider me surprised 😮
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:33 p.m.
        #4
        Thread Starter
        Drover006
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2021
        Posts: 1,448
        Likes: 494
        Quoting: MatthewsFan
        You definitely need to change this, way too one sided for the Leafs:
        Strome > Kerfoot
        Nylander > Engvall


        Strome who team is trying to trade and nylander who cant male the team? Its one of the reasons why it makes sense
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:47 p.m.
        #5
        Ovchinnikov 137
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 10,412
        Likes: 11,982
        Quoting: SomethingLeafs
        Strome who team is trying to trade and nylander who cant male the team? Its one of the reasons why it makes sense


        I’d be all over trading Kerfoot for Strome. He is clear upgrade offensively over Alex even if the numbers don’t really suggest that. But Strome’s status as a 3rd overall pick still means he’ll cost more than he probably should, at least while he’s still under the age of 25. Toronto is adding IMO
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 1:56 p.m.
        #6
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2019
        Posts: 1,220
        Likes: 685
        Would rather have Kerfoot over Strome.
        BCAPP liked this.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
        #7
        exo2769
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2015
        Posts: 15,536
        Likes: 9,582
        Quoting: SomethingLeafs
        Strome who team is trying to trade and nylander who cant male the team? Its one of the reasons why it makes sense


        The reason Strome is on the outside looking in is because the Hawks have a glut of centers. They don't want a center back. Especially one with term.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 2:07 p.m.
        #8
        Thread Starter
        Drover006
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2021
        Posts: 1,448
        Likes: 494
        Quoting: exo2769
        The reason Strome is on the outside looking in is because the Hawks have a glut of centers. They don't want a center back. Especially one with term.


        Kerfoot is better at wing
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 2:36 p.m.
        #9
        exo2769
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2015
        Posts: 15,536
        Likes: 9,582
        Quoting: SomethingLeafs
        Kerfoot is better at wing


        But it's as compared to who else the Hawks have. Is he better than Kane/Debrincat/Kubalik/Hagel/Kurashev? No to all of those pretty quickly. Can he be an effective #3LW??? Maybe, because that's the one slot available to him, but that doesn't really help the Hawks...and it'll hurt them next year. Better to take any picks offered and flip those for something they actually need.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 2:46 p.m.
        #10
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2019
        Posts: 10,250
        Likes: 3,963
        Doesn't chicago have a surplus of players? I thought they are moving strome because their roster doesn't have any room for him. I can't see them doing a player trade.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
        #11
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2019
        Posts: 2,744
        Likes: 2,601
        Quoting: MatthewsFan
        I’d be all over trading Kerfoot for Strome. He is clear upgrade offensively over Alex even if the numbers don’t really suggest that. But Strome’s status as a 3rd overall pick still means he’ll cost more than he probably should, at least while he’s still under the age of 25. Toronto is adding IMO


        You know what the problem is in Leaf land? Constantly thinking about offense. Everyone knows the team has to get better defensively yet here we are discussing how trading for Strome makes the Leafs better offensively.

        Until this team figures out how to play better defensively, it's not going to win playoff rounds.
        BCAPP liked this.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 3:01 p.m.
        #12
        Ovchinnikov 137
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 10,412
        Likes: 11,982
        Quoting: oneX
        You know what the problem is in Leaf land? Constantly thinking about offense. Everyone knows the team has to get better defensively yet here we are discussing how trading for Strome makes the Leafs better offensively.

        Until this team figures out how to play better defensively, it's not going to win playoff rounds.


        You know what the problem with Leaf fans is not realizing there inefficiency to score at 5v5 that has plagued for the past two seasons.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:01 p.m.
        #13
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 9,379
        Likes: 3,695
        Quoting: MatthewsFan
        You definitely need to change this, way too one sided for the Leafs:
        Strome > Kerfoot
        Nylander > Engvall


        Disagree. Strome has more upside than Kerfoot offensively but kerfoot is better today and definitely better defensively and two way.

        Engvall is a good bottom 6 utility player it's just that the leafs are so cap crunched his few hundred k above min hurt.

        He would probably be between the 9th-13th forward on every team in the league. The leafs just need that cap efficiency
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:02 p.m.
        #14
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 9,379
        Likes: 3,695
        Quoting: exo2769
        But it's as compared to who else the Hawks have. Is he better than Kane/Debrincat/Kubalik/Hagel/Kurashev? No to all of those pretty quickly. Can he be an effective #3LW??? Maybe, because that's the one slot available to him, but that doesn't really help the Hawks...and it'll hurt them next year. Better to take any picks offered and flip those for something they actually need.


        Hes better than Hagel and kurashev.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:03 p.m.
        #15
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 9,379
        Likes: 3,695
        Quoting: MatthewsFan
        You know what the problem with Leaf fans is not realizing there inefficiency to score at 5v5 that has plagued for the past two seasons.


        And kerfoot is a solid es scorer...
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:05 p.m.
        #16
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 9,379
        Likes: 3,695
        Quoting: MatthewsFan
        You know what the problem with Leaf fans is not realizing there inefficiency to score at 5v5 that has plagued for the past two seasons.


        Also what are you talking about?

        The leafs are literally FIRST in the NHL in 5*5 goals for in the last 2 seasons (plus these few games)

        http://www.nhl.com/stats/teams?report=goalsforbystrength&reportType=season&seasonFrom=20192020&seasonTo=20212022&gameType=2&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,1&sort=goalsFor5On5&page=0&pageSize=50

        So they're scoring at es fine...
        oneX liked this.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:30 p.m.
        #17
        exo2769
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2015
        Posts: 15,536
        Likes: 9,582
        Edited Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:35 p.m.
        Quoting: BCAPP
        Hes better than Hagel and kurashev.


        Very much disagree, but your a TOR fan and I'm a CHI fan... Especially disagree when it comes to Hagel. I could at least hear the argument he's equal to Kurashev...who the Hawks are really high on, but Hagel is far better than Kerfoot. Hagel's arguably the Hawks best forward so far this year. It's between him and Dach.
        Oct. 16, 2021 at 4:51 p.m.
        #18
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 9,379
        Likes: 3,695
        Quoting: exo2769
        Very much disagree, but your a TOR fan and I'm a CHI fan... Especially disagree when it comes to Hagel. I could at least hear the argument he's equal to Kurashev...who the Hawks are really high on, but Hagel is far better than Kerfoot. Hagel's arguably the Hawks best forward so far this year. It's between him and Dach.


        Im not going on this season where I'll clearly state I haven't watched him. But more importantly it's been 2-3 games. Im going off prior to this year. 2-3 games is too small a sample size to make much out of.

        Of course if he's still doing this at your Thanksgiving I'm happy to reassess
        exo2769 liked this.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll