Quoting: evelutions2
Alright, I'll bite. If Campbell is just a backup and sucks, why does he have the starting role? Mrazek was brought in to help balance out the goaltending, but only play a small amount of games as he would likely not perform as well in Toronto as he did in Carolina based on the defense alone. The Leafs originally brought him in as the backup, but he is starting a lot of games. The leafs didn't even have enough cap space to bring up their AHL goalie for pity's sake when Mrazek got injured. When the rest of the leafs were sucking last postseason against the Habs, the only player who was even remotely competent in that series was Campbell. Just because the Leafs suck as a whole doesn't mean one player individually sucks.
The point eluded you sir. My point is people on this site will say nonsense like this.
Capfriendly commentators (such as yourself)
"The Leafs defence sucks the only reason they don't get shelled is because of Campbell"
"The Leafs will never go anywhere unless they fix their defence"
"One of the core will have to be traded for a #1 defenceman"
And at the same time those same people in a different conversation
"Campbell is just a backup, he's laughable as a starter."
"The Leafs have 2 backup goalies"
"The Leafs defence make it easy on him because they don't allow a lot of shots."
Always the same crap