Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks TDL

Created by: KMarner10
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 27, 2021
Published: Oct. 22, 2021
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Team Explanation
Note - I do not watch the Sharks that often, but this is something that I think could help the team in the long run. Lots of cap space, great young players, and this team could either be good enough to push for the playoffs or fall into a lottery spot.

Hertl resigned around 8x8 , Dahlen, Studnicka, Barabanov all resigned for 2-5 years depending on what they deserve.

Couture was only traded because it benefitted both teams - Boston got their 2C, SJ got a 1st in a stacked draft class, a middle 6 forward in Coyle and a good young forward that can compliment Eklund and Dahlen.

Also - These were just hypothetical trades that I don't think are going to happen. Some of the values could be way off.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Dahlen, Jonathan1$750,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Kane, Evander ($3,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
They can get another team to retain $2M
2.
SJS
  1. Coyle, Charlie ($750,000 retained)
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Retained by ARI
BOS
  1. Couture, Logan
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
$2M retained by ARI
3.
SJS
    For retaining Coyle
    ARI
    1. 2023 4th round pick (SJS)
    2. 2022 5th round pick (BUF)
    Buyouts
    • Martin Jones: $1,916,667
    Retained Salary Transactions
    • Evander Kane: $3,000,000 (142.27%)
    • Andrew Cogliano: $500,000 (50%)
    DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
    2022
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the MIN
    2023
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    2024
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$72,225,001$0$1,202,500$9,274,999

    Roster

    Left WingCenterRight Wing
    Logo of the SJS
    Eklund, William
    $925,000
    LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the SJS
    Hertl, Tomas
    $5,625,000
    C, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the BOS
    Studnicka, Jack
    $769,167
    RW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Meier, Timo
    $6,000,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the BOS
    Coyle, Charlie
    $4,500,000
    C, RW
    NMC NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the SJS
    Balcers, Rūdolfs
    $1,550,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Dahlen, Jonathan
    $750,000
    Logo of the SJS
    Bonino, Nick
    $2,050,000
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Labanc, Kevin
    $4,725,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the SJS
    Cogliano, Andrew
    $500,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Weatherby, Jasper
    $842,500
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Barabanov, Alexander
    $1,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the SJS
    Ferraro, Mario
    $925,000
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Burns, Brent
    $8,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the SJS
    Reimer, James
    $2,250,000
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Simek, Radim
    $2,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the SJS
    Karlsson, Erik
    $11,500,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the SJS
    Hill, Adin
    $2,175,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Knyzhov, Nikolai
    $796,667
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
    $7,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the SJS
    Gambrell, Dylan
    $1,100,000
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Nieto, Matt
    $850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Middleton, Jacob
    $725,000
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the SJS
    Pederson, Lane
    $750,000 ($0)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the SJS
    Leonard, John
    $925,000 ($0)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Merkley, Nick
    $750,000 ($0)
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the SJS
    Gregor, Noah
    $750,000 ($0)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1

    Special Teams

    Power Play 1
    , .
    Hertl, T.
    Meier, T.
    Burns, B.
    Eklund, W.
    Power Play 2
    Labanc, K.
    Studnicka, J.
    Balcers, R.
    Karlsson, E.
    Dahlen, J.
    Penalty Kill 1
    Bonino, N.
    Cogliano, A.
    Knyzhov, N.
    Vlasic, M.
    Penalty Kill 2
    Hertl, T.
    Labanc, K.
    Simek, R.
    Karlsson, E.

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:27 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 3,828
    Likes: 1,197
    I don’t see a team giving you positive assets for Kane
    KMarner10, sensonfire, palhal and 2 others liked this.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:34 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 133
    Likes: 16
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    I don’t see a team giving you positive assets for Kane


    That's what I think, but when he plays he is a good scorer with Grit. At $4M he could be good for the top 9 and he seems like someone who would excel in playoff hockey. Plus, they signed DeAngello so I am a bit reluctant to say that they wouldn't give Kane a look.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:38 p.m.
    #3
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 10,593
    Likes: 8,211
    I'm a bit confused here...is Arizona retaining $2 mil on Couture for 5 years (Plus whatever money remained this year...let's leave it at $10 mil total for now though), and $750k for 4+ years ($3 mil total) on Coyle? Because the cost of getting them to do that would be hilariously high. Just the $3 mil over 4 years on Coyle would be more than a 4th+5th.

    With Kane...far more likely to see him get waived and end up in the AHL or being paid to sit home (followed by a buyout this summer) than for someone to actually give up assets for him.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:46 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 11,255
    Likes: 4,969
    Hertl is interesting, not Couture and his contract.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:47 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    No one is going to take couture, let alone give up those assets for him.
    palhal liked this.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
    #6
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 44,705
    Likes: 14,415
    Teams can spend 7m a lot better than for the newest version of Kane. Kinda the same situation with 8m Couture
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 2:49 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 624
    Likes: 399
    Outside of the deals and their values, the Coyotes can't retain 2 more they already have 2 on the books and the max is 3
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:31 p.m.
    #8
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 2,681
    Likes: 1,318
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    No one is going to take couture, let alone give up those assets for him.


    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol
    FunMustBeAlways and CheechYou liked this.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:44 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol


    4C is a pretty big stretch.

    Being a sharks fan, do you really want to be throwing shade at other teams for overpaying players?
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:46 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,402
    Likes: 2,544
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol


    coyles probably a fringe 2c. more suited as a winger, or 3c. dont think hes overpaid especially when cap jumps
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:48 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: hanson493
    coyles probably a fringe 2c. more suited as a winger, or 3c. dont think hes overpaid especially when cap jumps


    He’s definitely definitely definitely not more suited as a winger. Very much the opposite.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:50 p.m.
    #12
    The right to Wright
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 566
    Likes: 123
    Imagine DeAngelo and Kane in the same lockerroom
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 3:57 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,402
    Likes: 2,544
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    He’s definitely definitely definitely not more suited as a winger. Very much the opposite.


    His best stretch of production as a bruin was as a winger lol.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 4:14 p.m.
    #14
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 2,469
    Likes: 953
    Canes won’t trade for Kane. If Kane gets bought out, Canes might consider signing him on a 1x1 deal to make a deep run in the playoffs, but I don’t see Carolina having both Kane and DeAngelo on the roster at the same time. In terms of a Kane trade, the Sharks want out of Kane so they will have to pay a pretty penny to dump him on someone else. Kane will not return positive assets. You might get a late round pick but the cost to dump him will heavily offset the trade.
    Oct. 22, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: hanson493
    His best stretch of production as a bruin was as a winger lol.


    No it wasn’t. The Bruins have been very open about how much better he is at center. They tried him at wing. It didn’t work.
    Oct. 23, 2021 at 10:17 a.m.
    #16
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 2,681
    Likes: 1,318
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    4C is a pretty big stretch.

    Being a sharks fan, do you really want to be throwing shade at other teams for overpaying players?


    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 8:35 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next


    First off, you don’t have players. You’re a fanboy. None of this is yours. You aren’t an owner, GM, player, or coach.

    The sharks stink. Ya, they came out of the gate hot, and managed to beat three bad teams, and one okay one. Hooorayyyy! They have four of the most overpaid players in the league, and that cancer is coming back.

    You think Karlsson is paid appropriately? He’s at best an okay second pair D and is the highest paid d man in the league.
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 2:26 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next


    You were saying?
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 2:50 p.m.
    #19
    Days of our Hawks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 4,815
    Likes: 1,995
    Your lucky to dump an unprotected first to Carolina for them to do that trade
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 3:44 p.m.
    #20
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 2,681
    Likes: 1,318
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    You were saying?


    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 3:50 p.m.
    #21
    Days of our Hawks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 4,815
    Likes: 1,995
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.


    Still a loss is a loss

    I know that from experience #FIRECOLLITONANDBOWMEN
    Oct. 24, 2021 at 3:52 p.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.


    Ah. So refs fault and even though the sharks lost they were better. Cool.

    They beat a few bad teams. Whatever. The team stinks. The contracts are horrid, and your language here makes me think the sharks could be 0-82 and you’d be saying they were actually one of the top teams in the league. Later.
    Oct. 25, 2021 at 9:18 a.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 12,969
    Likes: 4,297
    Quoting: IconicHawk
    Still a loss is a loss

    I know that from experience #FIRECOLLITONANDBOWMEN


    I’m sure he’ll figure out a way to explain all the losses. It’s pretty clear that the sharks are brutal, but he’ll tell you otherwise. Contracts are great too apparently.
    Oct. 29, 2021 at 7:22 p.m.
    #24
    Days of our Hawks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 4,815
    Likes: 1,995
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I’m sure he’ll figure out a way to explain all the losses. It’s pretty clear that the sharks are brutal, but he’ll tell you otherwise. Contracts are great too apparently.


    My question was is the start sustainable? I think we know the answer now
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Remove Option
    Submit Poll