Quoting: ChiHawk
1) You are wrong, you have to look at advanced analytics and video footage not NHL.com as if that proves anything LMAO! Gaslighting??? You must be "woke" 20 something LMAO...too funny
2) He scored 30 goals/46 points in 68 games his first season (prorated to 82 game season that's 36 goals/55 points), 25 goals/56 points last season prorated to a full 82 game season (17 goals/38 points in 56 games. Good luck trying to find that production in a first round pick from 10 to 15.
2a) Obviously you've never looked at the advanced analytics that would tell you 33% of first round picks actually ever become consistent NHL players, let alone a consistent 55 point producer that can pot 25 to 30 goals a season. Draft picks, especially outside the top 5, are a bag of magic beans and there is plenty of articles to support what I'm saying by professional analysis...I suggest you use Google like you've been raised to do.
2b) Again wrong, Kubs is on the PP#1 the last two games, but traditionally plays the 2nd PP because of keeping a top sniper, he and Cat, each on one of the units. The fact you don't understand simple numbers and simple game strategy says all we need to know about your opinion.
3) I don't want this trade, didn't create it, and my other comments clearly state that so I don't care if Ottawa were to accept or not, Hawks almost certainly decline. That said, but your opinion is completely uneducated though I'm glad I can help you in that department.
1. When you scroll down, you see "LW" in capitalized letters.
If you're unable to read two letters, then I'm starting to wonder if you're dyslexic.
You probably didn't start learning the alphabet until you turned 18.
Pity.
2. Production is not the only thing you look at when it comes to drafting.
It's part of the reason why a defenseman sometimes goes 1st overall instead of a forward.
But you wouldn't know that, because in your world, a player is worthless if they don't produce a sizeable amount of points.
2a. I find it funny that you tell me to use google to look up these "advanced analytics" and this "professional analysis" when you can't even do it yourself.
You didn't even have the courage or capacity to include a link when you posted this nonsense.
Pity.
2b. The fact that you needed to pivot away from discussing Kubalik's time on the power-play in comparison to Tyler Johnson's says all we need to know about your opinion.
Pity.
3. You and a bunch of other Hawks' fans in the comments have tried to force-feed the idea that this trade is good for Ottawa.
It's not.
Whether you wanted it, created it or posted a bunch of drivel to try and distance yourself from it is irrelevant.
That said, your opinion is completely frivolous though, so I'm glad I could give you a helping hand.