Laughable, honestly

No, I would seriously consider it as a Leaf. Sure Gaudreau is gone next summer, but then their is 9m X 3 to spend without Marner.

No, I would seriously consider it as a Leaf. Sure Gaudreau is gone next summer, but then their is 9m X 3 to spend without Marner.

You really can't forgive Marner eh.

Think your bias is seriously impairing your judgement when it comes to Marner.

Wait, you are part of the anti marner crew now?

I think in a flat cap league, Marner is not worth his 11m. By this post, Leafs get Gaudreau and some cap space and next year it's 9m to spend elsewhere without Marner. I kinda think it's a fair trade, not against Marner bias at all. Gee, I hope the Leafs keep Marner at right point on the PP, He has been really good there before, and can really add value to the team.

You're saying in other threads expose Marner to Seattle to lose him for nothing, meaning you think he's litterally worth nothing but capspace.

You obviously can't even see your bias at this point.

Again. 24 yo 90 pt player who gets selke votes are better investments than soon to be broken down Z.Hymans or have a year or 2 left in them M.Granlunds.

It's not as if they are getting two other 24 top 6 forwards instead of him.

This isn't hard to figure out.

You're saying in other threads expose Marner to Seattle to lose him for nothing, meaning you think he's litterally worth nothing but capspace.

You obviously can't even see your bias at this point.

Instead of worrying about my so called bias you should look at the trade proposed. Gaudreau for one year and an bottom end NHL Dman for Marner this year, plus some cap space this year. IMO it's a reasonable deal for this year. Then the Leafs get 9m in cap space for three year with Gaudreau and Marner gone starting next season. So I don't think the trade proposal was unreasonable at all. So please
don't call bias against Marner at my part. Maybe you can't see past your pro Marner bias and you think he's worth 11m or 9m. Now I admit reasonable people could argue the merits of Marner's value, but calling me bias against Marner...that's just foolish.
And yes, I did float the idea of exposing Marner to Seattle...Could the Leafs have spend 11m better than on one Marner? That is open to reasonable debate, and nothing to do with anyone's pro or anti bias about Marner.

Not anti Marner....but I do think the Leafs (if they were wise) could spend his cap space better. I think trade proposed is fair, that's why I think it's a valid suggestion.

Seems like Tavares is a better target for this, or even rielly (that extension shocked me), but fair.