Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Strome is more expensive than Kerfoot next year his QO is 3.6 million…
Also Kerfoot can plan centre or either wings. It’s makers more sense for Blackhawks to recoup assets you will get more value from at the deadline rather than hoping declining assets can get back to form. Nylander and Strome are declining assets it’s simple.
Also Debrincat can play either wings, but y’all put him with Kane to create one of the worst defensive lines in the league. It would make more sense to split them up and play them with a winger that has a 2-way game.
But what do ik. It’s evident you don’t really know what your talking about lol.
It would make more sense to have your lines as:
Kubalik-Dach-Debrincat
Kerfoot-Toews-Kane
1) Hawks can move Strome for picks and prospects, they don't have the cap space to keep him either or worse yet, take on more cap in a Strome trade.
2) Strome is out of favor with the coach in Chicago, it's well known and documented. Yet this "declining" 24 year old RFA center is a .58 career pgp versus a 27 year old .48pgp 2 year rental
3) Wrong, Cat does not play both wings, he plays the left side always. He also doesn't play with Kane all the time.
4) You don't put two snipers on the same line, Cat and Kubalik...LMAO WOW...who doesn't know what they are talking about?
Kerfoot is not needed for the Hawks, he doesn't fit their top 6, and they don't have the cap space to take on a 2 year rental UFA when they can move Strome for prospects and or picks. Period
Like a lot of leafs fans, you guys propose and support one another's AGMs with little to no consideration of the other team. Moving on...