It's funny how like every single depth player they ever sign to anything more than league minimum gets unloaded in their AGMs without a second thought

No. Still.

Campbell now has a career .920 sv%

Putting him on par with:

Saros

Vasilevskiy

Noone else ✔

It'd be crazy if he didn't at least get 6M$

Which is effectively an average cap hit at this point

No one is giving up 3 picks including a 1st for one year of Kerfoot even if he does have a 2nd attached to him.

The longer he goes unsinged the higher his cap hit for next year is getting (mid 5's maybe a 6) Especially if he continues this pace, leads them on a long playoff run that we all want and could even be in contention for a Vezina

Yup. There's a lot of these "Campbell for $4 mil" and I don't see how he takes a dime less than the 3 x $5 that Petersen just signed. It would be absolutely shocking. I get that he apparently loves in in Toronto, but expecting him to only take $200 k more than Mrazek is a friggin' stretch.

Jets will re-sign Stastny if Copp walks and keep their picks. Especially with Perfetti waiting in the wings for a Top 6 spot.

Campbell's contract is at minimum $1 million too low, but you can easily cover that be not signing Mikheyev and replacing him with someone cheaper

Blues decline Leafs add here not the blues

Quick takes that may be completely off:
-If Holl is playing well, you don't move him. Even if the Blues accepted (Which I doubt they would), Bortuzzo taking a pay cut is a big stretch.
-If Winnipeg can't sign Copp (Probably Hyman-ish money), they'd probably be looking for a cheaper player than Kerfoot, especially if they're moving the 1st. I get that they get a 2nd back, but that type of deal seems very NHL 22-esque.
-Just waive Engvall. He's not horrible, but he's a the type of guy that comes at the league minimum (And there's probably younger guys that teams already have that provide the same thing he does).
-The entire league had a shot at Ritchie, and nobody paid the amount that the Leafs did. Sure, maybe someone takes a chance at him, but saying "we can retain", when realistically you can't (You've only got $122 k in space with this current lineup for 22/23)
-Campbell at $4 mil when Dubas just gave Mrazek $200 k less is as friendly as team friendly deals get. I can't see it. Petersen at 3 x $5 is the floor, and Campbell >>> Petersen. There's a number of teams that will be looking for a starter in the offseason, and it's far more likely that he gets $5-5.5 after the numbers that he's put up.

Who the f*ck is going to play a freaking first for ALEX KERFOOT

Campbell has played less than 100 NHL games, bud. He needs to show more. It's likely $5M/3 year deal, or $4.5M/4 year deal.

Campbell is gonna get more than that. You can book it.

I bet Robertson never plays 300 games in the NHL. Injury prone.

The Blues would politely decline that in a nanosecond IMO. They could do much better.

This just looks like another helping of the group that doesn't win anything when it really matters.

No thanks.