SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Vancouver does rebuild do it right

Created by: Reason
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 17, 2021
Published: Nov. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Not saying Vancouver should commit to a rebuild, yet, however if they finally do have a change of course they should do it with both feet in. The end goal should be a Stanley Cup, not the playoffs.

If they do commit to a rebuild all the players being moved, expect maybe Boeser, will be out of their prime by the time Vancouver is able to compete. If Boeser is still in his prime he will be near the end of it. Garland is kept for now as he is a already a fan favourite and helps form a respectable first line. EP, QH, NH, VP are all kept as the are young enough to build around going forward. All other roster players would be available for the right price.

Taking an approach like this may be worth considering. These types of moves would restock Vancouver's depleted prospect pool and add a much need infusion of young possible impact players to their roster. It would also give them around 16 million to add players in the offseason.
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. McTavish, Mason
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Horvat, Bo
Additional Details:
Horvat seems like he would be a great fit with the Ducks.
He's a leader, faceoff monster and plays his best in big games.

If he's a bit to old at 26 for the Ducks, trade could be made to another team for a similar package.
2.
VAN
  1. Turcotte, Alex
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Not totally sure of Turcottes value. If he's an A prospect, him and a 2nd seem like fair value for a still young Boeser.
3.
VAN
  1. Wallstedt, Jesper [Reserve List]
  2. 2022 1st round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Demko, Thatcher
Additional Details:
If your just going to look at Demko's currnt save percentage, might want to skip commenting. He is a legitimate high end number 1, he is playing behind by far the worst PK and defense in the NHL. Seems like a good fit for a Wild team that could be competitors for some time.
4.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$66,391,493$648,780$6,232,500$15,108,507
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:03 p.m.
#26
LafreneiretoKravtsov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 833
So, i never was a JT Miller fan but he's almost a perfect fit. He can play any role in any position in the top 9. Plays on the PP, kills penalties, wins faceoffs, hits. And he can put up points.

Tricky part, the Rangers aren't necessarily looking for a point per game guy. They need a complimentary guy that can provide scoring. The cost via trade might be a bit much. I could see Schneider plus pick. Kravtsov + B prospect + pick. Don't think you'll see 2 top prospects moved in this deal.
Masonh618 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:08 p.m.
#27
Vancouerrific
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 1,052
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
^


wtf-what.gif
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:08 p.m.
#28
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,560
Likes: 6,713
Quoting: WhereArtTLuongo
wtf-what.gif


Read what I said above lmfao
WhereArtTLuongo and csick liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:11 p.m.
#29
Vancouerrific
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 1,052
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Read what I said above lmfao


Haha Gotcha
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:25 p.m.
#30
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,569
Likes: 23,738
Quoting: Juiceman
A bit foolish


Ya
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:32 p.m.
#31
HonestHockeyNYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 309
Likes: 278
I think Minnesota's alright in terms of goaltending. Demko though could be a nice insurance policy for another playoff contender at the deadline.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:15 p.m.
#32
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 2,487
I like Demko but that price is high. You are asking for two firsts, in this case. Swap out Wallstedt for Kahkonen and you are closer. That said, Wild don't have cap space for Demko.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:28 p.m.
#33
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 449
There's no way like ever wild are doing this. Minnesota isn't trading jasper wallstedt much less add an additional 1st round pick for Demko whose not that great of a G. If you think Vancouver can get two 1st round picks for him, it's not realistic
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:51 p.m.
#34
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,053
Likes: 24,970
Hmmmm . . . One year plus of Horvat or 7 years plus of McTavish . . . who wont cost as much for the first three as Horvat costs for his one . . . hmmmm . . .
OutCold13 and HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:53 p.m.
#35
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Hmmmm . . . One year plus of Horvat or 7 years plus of McTavish . . . who wont cost as much for the first three as Horvat costs for his one . . . hmmmm . . .


Read through previous comments for a response. Previous poster already brought this to light and it was responded to.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:55 p.m.
#36
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: CAPDumba
There's no way like ever wild are doing this. Minnesota isn't trading jasper wallstedt much less add an additional 1st round pick for Demko whose not that great of a G. If you think Vancouver can get two 1st round picks for him, it's not realistic


You obviously haven't watched much of Demko.
You may be correct in that Demko might not get two 1st's, but I would bet there is a team willing to pay that price, or close too it.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 11:02 p.m.
#37
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 449
Quoting: Reason
You obviously haven't watched much of Demko.
You may be correct in that Demko might not get two 1st's, but I would bet there is a team willing to pay that price, or close too it.


No one is paying two 1st round picks . Its been made clear through draft gm's don't value G like that. You are just exxageraion and being bias. I have watch Demko. The exxageraion about him being this great G isn't. He let's in easy goals and teams like wild and other have his number
OutCold13 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 11:30 p.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 3,279
Yeah I’m good, we couldn’t afford him long term and I don’t think he’s that much of an improvement over Strome to be worth it especially considering Strome’s chemistry with Panarin. If anything we need to shift Chytil to the wing and get a 3C to play behind Mika and Strome instead of trying to fix what isn’t broken in Strome.
Reason liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 11:33 p.m.
#39
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Edited Nov. 18, 2021 at 12:47 a.m.
Quoting: CAPDumba
No one is paying two 1st round picks . Its been made clear through draft gm's don't value G like that. You are just exxageraion and being bias. I have watch Demko. The exxageraion about him being this great G isn't. He let's in easy goals and teams like wild and other have his number


That's a decent point about goalie values not being that of others, and was something I did consider. My bet however is that most teams that would be trading for Demko wouldn't be surrendering high first round picks, they would likely be 20-32 range and it would be teams that are ready to compete now and for the next few years. I don't think someone would surrender two high-mid round 1sts, but I will concede my evaluation might be a bit off, maybe a 1st and a 2nd.

Demko has been great, his team has been the worst defensively and on the PK. There is chatter that he COULD make team USA for the Olympics and that team is deep with elite goaltenders.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 11:34 p.m.
#40
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Yeah I’m good, we couldn’t afford him long term and I don’t think he’s that much of an improvement over Strome to be worth it especially considering Strome’s chemistry with Panarin. If anything we need to shift Chytil to the wing and get a 3C to play behind Mika and Strome instead of trying to fix what isn’t broken in Strome.


That's a fair comment. I appreciate your perspective.
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 12:12 a.m.
#41
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,560
Likes: 6,713
Quoting: Reason
Might be waiting a long time with the way he's playing.


Quoting: Juiceman
He’s been a PPG since he came to Vancouver lmao. 136 points in 138 games. He has 18 points in 16 games so far putting him in the top ten for points in the nhl so far on a terrible Canucks team. You need to do some research before you make foolish remarks online


Quoting: TheAlien
He's been playing at a 70+ point pace every single season since joining Vancouver. Maybe you're the one with the imaginary narrative


Quoting: WhereArtTLuongo
Normally I post this under lousy trades but that comments of yours gives ME the urge to spit the Niagara Falls in your face


Apologies to you gentleman. I hope my past experiences watching JT Miller can subside and letting it cloud my judgment of the present version is just plain stupid.

I think I'd be willing to do a trade for him for anything around Strome, Kravtsov, Jones, Robertson, Othmann and picks but I don't see Schneider as an option here. They didn't even want to move him for Eichel.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 1:22 a.m.
#42
Vancouerrific
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 1,052
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Apologies to you gentleman. I hope my past experiences watching JT Miller can subside and letting it cloud my judgment of the present version is just plain stupid.

I think I'd be willing to do a trade for him for anything around Strome, Kravtsov, Jones, Robertson, Othmann and picks but I don't see Schneider as an option here. They didn't even want to move him for Eichel.


All good bud
Nov. 18, 2021 at 1:33 a.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 1,243
Well, if you look at Demko's recent numbers.... Wait, nevermind.

I just don't like this trade because we have good goaltending now (Talbot, Kähkönen) and great goaltending in the future (Wallstedt). G is something that is not a weakness for us, so I don't like the idea of giving up valuable assets to fix something that isn't broken.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 2:15 a.m.
#44
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 732
Quoting: EccE
Well, if you look at Demko's recent numbers.... Wait, nevermind.

I just don't like this trade because we have good goaltending now (Talbot, Kähkönen) and great goaltending in the future (Wallstedt). G is something that is not a weakness for us, so I don't like the idea of giving up valuable assets to fix something that isn't broken.


I mean it's definitely funny. Two weeks ago he was a must have great young goalie, two weeks later he's a poor number one. Has he changed that much over two weeks or does the Canucks less than 50% PK over that same time play a factor? That's not even mentioning the play of the defense at 5vs5. People pay to much attention to stats alone.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 12:22 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,879
Likes: 6,386
Quoting: Reason
I mean it's definitely funny. Two weeks ago he was a must have great young goalie, two weeks later he's a poor number one. Has he changed that much over two weeks or does the Canucks less than 50% PK over that same time play a factor? That's not even mentioning the play of the defense at 5vs5. People pay to much attention to stats alone.


Demko has a .922 sv% at even strength and a .782 sv% when on the pk. He's been great the pk is just historically bad
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll