SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Islanders need a shakeup and make a big trade with the Habs

Created by: neums33
Team: 2021-22 New York Islanders
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 28, 2021
Published: Nov. 29, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Islanders would be making 2 trades here that would shake up things a bit. I don't think either happens but i would add more to both trades if they were actually close.
First the Montreal trade is one where i actually think that Ben Chiarot is a major target for Lou Lamoriello. I really wouldn't be surprised to see him in an Islanders uniform this year. Yes he isnt a good skater and has been bad this year while also being a pending UFA. However, I dont think there is a better fit for him than a Barry Trotz system. It will help minimize his foot speed issues and he will be able to focus on defending. The price tag according to Elliote Friedman is is probably a solid prospect/young roster player, a 2nd round pick plus, or some sort of a combo of both with how his season has gone so far. Aho will be a solid bottom pair guy who brings offense. He's a great lateral skater and he beat out erik gustafsson for a roster spot this year (some of that had to do with his contract being cheaper as well). He's also very clearly the type of D the Habs are looking for and will be a cost effective asset for what he brings. I think a trade like this will happen bc it makes too much sense.
I just decided to spice it up by adding Josh Anderson. Gorton has a reputation for looking for skill over anything else, and it's why the Rangers fired him (dumb move by them bc he was doing a great job rebuilding). Their core is no longer Price, Weber, and Gallagher. It's Suzuki, Caufield and their top 10 pick this year. What they dont want to do is hold on to all these solid players with big contracts bc they will be in no mans land. You need high picks and high-end prospects to compete nowadays and i think Gorton will be solely focused on building a prospect pool full of skill. Right now it's completely barren of top prospects according to the prospect scouts and writers. So i think players like Anderson actually makes sense to move now while their value is high. Anderson has a history of injuries and inconsistency. I think it would be a very interesting idea for the Habs to entertain Oliver Wahlstrom for Anderson. Wahlstrom's goals per 60 equate him to being an easy 30 goal scorer. He was the Islanders leading goal scorer while playing the least minutes on the team. His shot is world class and a duo of him and Caufield as your top 6 RWs for years to come is a salivating thought. He doesn't have Trotz's trust rn bc his d-zone awareness and attention to detail is still inconsistent. However, he's already shown to be a great forechecker, he's been busting his butt off all year, and has a massive ceiling when fully developed. The reason the Isles would do it is bc they are in pure win now mode. Anderson is in his prime and is a very similar player to Tom Wilson who Trotz developed from a 4th liner to a 1st liner. He would be heavily used by Trotz over the next few years. I think the trade makes a lot of sense with where both organizations are at. The Isles add in a conditional 1st and 3rd based on them making the playoffs. That covers for Chiarot's return and the added value i think Anderson has over Wahlstrom rn.

The Blackhawks are in a very funny situation right now with having a coach who wants his team to focus heavily on defense while having a lineup and roster consisting of almost exclusively skilled players. They have a lot of severely underperforming players too. Dylan Strome has gotten to the point where he cant even be traded bc of his 3M dollar contract and the 3.5 qualifying offer hes entitled to this summer. Kubalik is in a similar boat with his RFA status and zero production. The 2 I put in this deal are 2 young players who arent working out and are very clearly not in the Blackhawks plans either. Nylander is buried in the AHL and producing at a meager half a point per game pace, and Borgstrom is getting 10 minutes a night while playing a role that doesnt suit him well at all. The blackhawks need bottom 6 players who play good defense and bring some size. Richard Panik has been ne of the Islanders best NHL forwards ever since he's been called up. He's been playing every game on their top line with Barzal bc Trotz is rewarding how hard he works and how physical and detailed he's been. He'd be perfect for the Hawks but not sure Lou would consider trading him with his cap hit being so small. Dal Colle is a proven defensive specialist at the NHL level analytically. Despite being a #5 overall pick and producing at the AHL level, he has brought no offense at the NHL level so far. He would, however, fit perfectly into what Derek King is looking for in his bottom 6. Big body, good skater, playable skill and very strong defensively. Bellows was the one i wasn't sure about including bc Trotz has really liked his growth this year and he beat out a lot of players for a single open roster spot. He's a power forward type with a good shot and his defense has come a long way. The issue with him is consistency. He's a really streaky scorer. But he's a player that would suit well in a middle 6 spot right now and has potential if given a real chance. Borgstrom and Nylander are obviously former top prospects who have been traded to the Blackhawks and have not worked out well. Theyre both very skilled but are not very good skaters and have issues with effort. I think both would have some potential if Trotz ever got home to them. You never know which players will become Trotz students but when players do he always is able to turn them into really solid role players for his system. They also fill a RW and C depth position that the Isles are lacking right now
Trades
1.
NYI
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. Chiarot, Ben
  3. 2022 6th round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. Aho, Sebastian
  2. Hickey, Thomas
  3. Wahlstrom, Oliver
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (COL)
  5. 2023 4th round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
The 2nd round pick turns into a 2022 1st and the 4th turns into a 2022 3rd if the Islanders make the playoffs
(Hickey is a pending UFA that would allow the Islanders to make this work cap-wise. so just a throw in for salary purposes)
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the MTL
2023
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
2024
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,326,646$1,365,854$2,320,000$3,173,354

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Islanders
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$874,125$874,125
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LD
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:30 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 4,915
hawks decline
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:33 p.m.
#2
ALjet12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 315
you understand you are trading a top six forward that has te potential to score 30 goals, for a guy that has only crack 27 goals once. Wahlstrom is on an ELC. They don't need a dman they have Dobson and Salo two potential top 4 defensemen
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:33 p.m.
#3
Nuck Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 742
Likes: 327
I think MTL is fleecing you guys.

I see it as Chiarot for Hickey, Aho, and the picks then effectively Whalstrom for Anderson. Both of those are fleeces.

I understand your reasoning behind Trotz and Anderson but I don't think you should be giving up Whalstrom to get him. That contract is pretty questionable and Whalstrom could easily be the better player.
QualityTrades1 liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:34 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 194
Likes: 91
no shot wahlstrom is going anywhere lmao
QualityTrades1 and Db1899 liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 879
Likes: 535
Too much to read but Montreal is laughing if the Islanders accept that trade.

Anderson's contract is horrible so far just like most people expected.

So half a year of Chiarot and you take on the Anderson contract for an early pick, a mid-round pick, and two solid prospects.

I'd love to hear what other Islander fans think about this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,436
Likes: 6,390
Good thing I read the description, LOL. I think you have to make it a 1st and 3rd without conditions (except top 10 prtection and maybe performance related on the 3rd. Like if Chiarot doesn't play 50% of the playoff games the 3rd becomes a 4th) other than that I think the deal works. Aho also doesn't fit a need so he can come out of the deal
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 2,253
i didn’t read the whole thing at the top but the islanders would very easily decline that trade
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:45 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Campabee
Good thing I read the description, LOL. I think you have to make it a 1st and 3rd without conditions (except top 10 prtection and maybe performance related on the 3rd. Like if Chiarot doesn't play 50% of the playoff games the 3rd becomes a 4th) other than that I think the deal works. Aho also doesn't fit a need so he can come out of the deal


a first, third and a top prospect for a rental defenseman and an expensive old winger they don’t need does not make the deal work on the islanders side lmao
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:46 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 1,624
Wahlstrom is not being traded and Isles are not a Chiarot away from contending this year which is why you do not trade assets for him.
bagelbob and Db1899 liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:49 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,436
Likes: 6,390
Quoting: ragger_lord
I think MTL is fleecing you guys.

I see it as Chiarot for Hickey, Aho, and the picks then effectively Whalstrom for Anderson. Both of those are fleeces.

I understand your reasoning behind Trotz and Anderson but I don't think you should be giving up Whalstrom to get him. That contract is pretty questionable and Whalstrom could easily be the better player.


Hickey is a cap dump and cleared waivers both those year and last year, Aho isn't a need for Montreal so the Isles can keep him.

The deal then becomes 1st (top 10 protected) + 3rd (becomes a 4th if Chiarot plays less than 50% of the Isles playoff games) and Wahlstrom for taking a bad contract (Hickey) + Chiarot and Anderson(whose contract is not as bad as it is made out to be on here, considering he is on pace for 25 goals 5.5 until he is 33 is a pretty good deal)
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:51 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,436
Likes: 6,390
Quoting: bagelbob
a first, third and a top prospect for a rental defenseman and an expensive old winger they don’t need does not make the deal work on the islanders side lmao


You obviously have no idea who you are talking about since Anderson is 27 and in his prime (not old) Chiarot is a rental and still worth a late 1st + late 3rd everyday especially since the D market has been expensive this year.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:52 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: GoatBarzal
no shot wahlstrom is going anywhere lmao


i think he actually is and people are going to be surprised when it happens. Not going to go deep into it but there are major concerns with how he will fit into a Trotz system and how good his hockey IQ and hands are. Even if he pans out, he could become a Mike Hoffman who scores 30 goals but noone is interested in him bc hes a black hole 5v5 and horrible defensively. He's got a high ceiling but a low floor and an issue even with that high ceiling. I think Anderson's value to a Trotz team is very hard to quantify bc he will instantly be one of their most important pieces. Similar to how defensive defensemen become so highly valued under Trotz. Legit power forwards who an score are rare and almost priceless with how Trotz uses them
Campabee liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:54 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,436
Likes: 6,390
Quoting: Warrior24
Wahlstrom is not being traded and Isles are not a Chiarot away from contending this year which is why you do not trade assets for him.


That is fine and makes sense, the other argument from Bagelbob though does not especially when he says Andersonn at 27 is old but not Chiarot at 30
Nov. 29, 2021 at 3:55 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: bagelbob
a first, third and a top prospect for a rental defenseman and an expensive old winger they don’t need does not make the deal work on the islanders side lmao


expensive old winger? do you even follow hockey? lmaoooo
He's literally right in his prime and has a solid contract for someone who averages close to 30 goals over 82 games. his contract literally ends when hes only 33... The other things he brings would be invaluable to Trotz as well
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:02 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: Warrior24
Wahlstrom is not being traded and Isles are not a Chiarot away from contending this year which is why you do not trade assets for him.


The Isles are an unknown at this point. They have a full 65 games left this year. So even while having the least points in the league rn with a few games in hand, if they could regain their form from the last couple of years they can easily compete for a spot. they havent played a single home game yet with even half an NHL roster. The road trip to start the year was not only bad bc it was 13 games straight but also bc the scheduling of having 5 days off and then playing back to back nights just made no sense. They are definitely better than they have shown and their shooting luck and analytics back that up.
Chiarot would help a lot, specifically bc he would fit well in a Trotz system. I see him as more than a rental tbh bc Lou never likes trading for pending UFAs unless he signs them right away or believes he can sign tham after the year. Also i honestly think they will trade Wahlstrom soon bc there are a bunch of red flags still apparent that it's questionable if he will ever be able to fix. He's got a world class shot but has been very bad in most other areas
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:04 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Campabee
You obviously have no idea who you are talking about since Anderson is 27 and in his prime (not old) Chiarot is a rental and still worth a late 1st + late 3rd everyday especially since the D market has been expensive this year.


i should have used older instead of old, but i wouldn't do anderson for wahlstrom one for one considering the value of a young player on an ELC. based on forward age curves, the years they'd be getting on the contract are outside of anderson's prime years (which generally are the age 24-26 years). d market's been expensive but a first and a third for a rental for a currently non-playoff team not to mention moving a top prospect/young player is ridiculous
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:07 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: QualityTrades1
Too much to read but Montreal is laughing if the Islanders accept that trade.

Anderson's contract is horrible so far just like most people expected.

So half a year of Chiarot and you take on the Anderson contract for an early pick, a mid-round pick, and two solid prospects.

I'd love to hear what other Islander fans think about this.


I would gladly take on a 6M dollar contract for a unique power forward that scores at a close to 30 goal pace and is right in his prime. I think Trotz will get way more value out of him as well and he may put up insane numbers next to Barzal. And i think lou trades for Chiarot with an extension or thinking he has a chance of resigning him. He never gives up real assets for pure rentals. Just look at the last few deadlines. So a risky top prospect and a conditional 1st and 3rd for their immediate 1st line RW and 2nd pair D. Seems like a great deal to me
Campabee liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:09 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: neums33
Chiarot would help a lot, specifically bc he would fit well in a Trotz system. I see him as more than a rental tbh bc Lou never likes trading for pending UFAs unless he signs them right away or believes he can sign tham after the year. Also i honestly think they will trade Wahlstrom soon bc there are a bunch of red flags still apparent that it's questionable if he will ever be able to fix. He's got a world class shot but has been very bad in most other areas


i don't think chiarot is the type of player they need. you talked about how his poor foot speed can be disguised in the system, but they need to get faster, not slower. if they trade wahlstrom imo they do it for a better player than anderson. maybe a young defenseman with some term. he definitely has deficiencies but his underlying stats are solid, especially defensively.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:14 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 879
Likes: 535
Quoting: neums33
I would gladly take on a 6M dollar contract for a unique power forward that scores at a close to 30 goal pace and is right in his prime. I think Trotz will get way more value out of him as well and he may put up insane numbers next to Barzal. And i think lou trades for Chiarot with an extension or thinking he has a chance of resigning him. He never gives up real assets for pure rentals. Just look at the last few deadlines. So a risky top prospect and a conditional 1st and 3rd for their immediate 1st line RW and 2nd pair D. Seems like a great deal to me


Putting Anderson as a 1st line RW does not scream contender in any way but while I think it's a bad idea, I can see where you're coming from. I personally think you can get two better pieces for that kind of package.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:14 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: ALjet12
you understand you are trading a top six forward that has te potential to score 30 goals, for a guy that has only crack 27 goals once. Wahlstrom is on an ELC. They don't need a dman they have Dobson and Salo two potential top 4 defensemen


do you follow the team? they need a top 4 D right now like they need air to breathe. Pulock is hurt for a while and Chara and Greene can barely play on the 3rd pair right now. Salo and Dobson cant be trusted yet down the stretch in high leverage games. That leaves them with Pelech and Mayfield... They will trade for one, regardless of who it is. I'm willing to bet alot of money on that.
And i have a strong personal belief that Wahlstrom won't pan out. I think he will be a 25 goal scorer who is really bad 5v5, especially in his own zone. Anderson has never had someone like Barzal and he scores close to a 30 goal pace while bringing a unique skillset thats almost impossible to find nowadays. Hes also only 27 and has a 6M AAV until hes only 33. I think its a no brainer for the Isles but im not surprised people dont agree bc Wahlstrom's shot and goal scoring numbers heavily cloud the rest of his game. I think his ceiling is Mike Hoffman, someone the Isles wont touch with a 10 foot pole
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:17 p.m.
#21
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
Quoting: bagelbob
i should have used older instead of old, but i wouldn't do anderson for wahlstrom one for one considering the value of a young player on an ELC. based on forward age curves, the years they'd be getting on the contract are outside of anderson's prime years (which generally are the age 24-26 years). d market's been expensive but a first and a third for a rental for a currently non-playoff team not to mention moving a top prospect/young player is ridiculous


Pretty soon players are only going to be "good" and "in their prime" when they are exactly 25 years old. The day they turn 26 or over $5M, they're a cap dump. awesome face
neums33 and Campabee liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: QualityTrades1
Putting Anderson as a 1st line RW does not scream contender in any way but while I think it's a bad idea, I can see where you're coming from. I personally think you can get two better pieces for that kind of package.


Thats very fair. I personally love what Anderson and Chiarot bring to the table, especially in the playoffs. And im thinking strongly along the lines of how well they will fit in to the current Islanders team and system. Like Anderson isnt a star but hes better than what most teams run out with their star players nowadays (lightning excluded). He's definitely a better fit on the Isles top line than any of the RWs that Barzal has played with too
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:23 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,436
Likes: 6,390
Quoting: bagelbob
i don't think chiarot is the type of player they need. you talked about how his poor foot speed can be disguised in the system, but they need to get faster, not slower. if they trade wahlstrom imo they do it for a better player than anderson. maybe a young defenseman with some term. he definitely has deficiencies but his underlying stats are solid, especially defensively.


Chiarot is by all means not a speedy skater but he is also not slow by most standards. He skates pretty well for a big defensive D man. Ge isn't going to track down McDavid or Pual Byron in top gear but he can keep up with the average forward in the NHL.
neums33 liked this.
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:25 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Quoting: bagelbob
i don't think chiarot is the type of player they need. you talked about how his poor foot speed can be disguised in the system, but they need to get faster, not slower. if they trade wahlstrom imo they do it for a better player than anderson. maybe a young defenseman with some term. he definitely has deficiencies but his underlying stats are solid, especially defensively.


this is currently, and will remain, a major topic in the Islanders community. If you play back a game film and focus solely on Wahlstrom, most games you will come away thinking that he is very flawed and questioning his hockey IQ. the way he positions himself, decides to stickhandle, passes, etc are all major red flags. His possession numbers started off well bc he was getting carried by Pageau and Parise. His isolated stats very clearly showed that. I personally dont believe in him turning out well and i have watched alot of games of his in college, world juniors and the AHL. He will always flash bc his shot is so elite. But i truly think he doest have the hockey IQ or mental toughness that you need in top players. We will see how his career plays out but i'm very willing to die on that hill
Nov. 29, 2021 at 4:49 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,020
Likes: 12,091
Quoting: neums33
i think he actually is and people are going to be surprised when it happens. Not going to go deep into it but there are major concerns with how he will fit into a Trotz system and how good his hockey IQ and hands are. Even if he pans out, he could become a Mike Hoffman who scores 30 goals but noone is interested in him bc hes a black hole 5v5 and horrible defensively. He's got a high ceiling but a low floor and an issue even with that high ceiling. I think Anderson's value to a Trotz team is very hard to quantify bc he will instantly be one of their most important pieces. Similar to how defensive defensemen become so highly valued under Trotz. Legit power forwards who an score are rare and almost priceless with how Trotz uses them


You are one of the most delusional people I’ve ever seen on this site. The irony that You’re talking about hockey IQ and trading for anderson who might have the worst hockey IQ among forwards in the NHL. He is the definition of an all tools no toolbox players and he’s had the impact of a 4th liner the past two seasons.

You honestly have no clue what the f*ck you are talking about. The numbers don’t lie and Wahlstroms 5v5 numbers are strong. He’s excellent defensively and a great finisher.

 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll