Edited Nov. 30, 2021 at 9:19 p.m.
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
I think we are in agreement any variance is nuanced and de minimis
Okposo will be a Sabre in the 2023-'24 season but closer to Thompson current salary.
There is no reason to trade Girgensons, he is still signed for next year and plays up to his salary.
I think I may have expressed my opinion of Olofsson differently.
If Murray were to produce as well as he has this year, Karmanos will have some difficult decisions.
With Krebs and Peterka piling up the points in the AHL, who is the odd man out?
Olofsson as you correctly predict could bring prospect with the value of Pekar, a first and maybe more at the TDL.
Then Buffalo still has Skinner, Peterka, Krebs, Bjork, Girgensons at LW.
Or, move Mittelstadt to LW or Thompson to RW then put Krebs between Peterka and Quinn.
Cozens has started to produce faster than I had expected.
Consider this line up if Olofsson is traded for a first, second and a prospect similar to Laaksonen:
Skinner Cozens Thompson They are on pace to produce 90 goals this season
Murray Mittelstadt Tuch Alex may be the catalyst to get this line producing really well.
Peterka Krebs Quinn I think this the line playing in Rochester
Bjork Girgensons Okposo ("C") and the crash line
Let me close, we all tend to over value our prospects.
I think Boston fans are doing the with Lysell.
IMO he is still only a prospect playing with teenagers and producing decent results.
On the other Olofsson is in the NHL producing at 25 goal, 60 pt seasons.
To say Buffalo would be the team to add in a one for one trade is pure prejudice.
Well before, we were talking about Okposo & Girgs being traded Bc he thought room needed to be made for Murray & Weissbach next year- and that’s insane to me
But i also think it’s crazy to trade Olofsson
Even though what you suggest would be good value for him,
the return is “futures” which may or may not work out
Why would we want that when we already have a young player in Olofsson who is producing here?
Doesn’t make sense
Moving a guy out like Bjork is reasonable if we wanna get another kid in the lineup
Like u said, all the kids might not work out
Right now, the top line is:
Skinner-Tage-Olofsson
I’m not touching that for next year if it keeps producing
Now things get interesting as to how we make up the lines
Let’s say Cozens & Mitts & Krebs are in contention for 2C & 3C,
and one of them moves to the wing
That gives us 3 other winger spots to fill in the middle6
Tuch takes one of those spots for sure
Assuming no other top9 quality forwards are brought in,
that would leave:
Quinn, Peterka, & Asplund fighting for those last 2 spots
The only 1 (of those) who could reasonable fit on our defensive line would be Asplund
But we would also still have Bjork who fits well enough there with Girgs & Okposo
So to me, it looks like the decision is basically:
Do the Sabres want all 3 of Quinn, Peterka & Krebs to START the season on the roster?
If so, Bjork is moved or becomes the 13th forward
If NOT, then:
-Bjork is on that defensive line
-Asplund is in the top9 somewhere
-and one of Krebs, Quinn & Peterka STARTS in the AHL and gets called up when there’s an injury- which will surely happen at some point, so whoever is “left out” at the start of the season will still get their shot up here sooner than later.
If they play well, Bjork gets scratched moving forward
I don’t think Olofsson is getting moved for futures so that we can keep Bjork in the lineup
Could he be moved for a young player who’s “ready” for the NHL, or for a stud prospect they like who will be ready soon?
Ok, i could see that
But i don’t think farther off futures like a late 1st, etc from someone makes sense
We’ve already got three 1sts in this next draft
And is good as it is,
Olofsson is already producing at a rate we’d hope for that pick to eventually reach
It only gets complicated if we were to bring in a forward like DeBrusk…. or whoever…. that would slot into the top9
But I’ll cross that bridge when it actually happens
Not gonna put too much thought into it until then