Quoting: MikeyG420
You are all still hurt about the bubble days and it shows. Fiala is not better than Boeser. We will not make a trade with Minnesota. You don't have much to offer aside from RD options and Eriksson-Ek anyways. Greenway is okay, but he's been lacking production wise. After that, a lot of what-ifs and conditional gambles. We've made enough of those types of risks in recent years. No more.
I wouldn't say "hurt", I would say "knows how to use statistics instead of feelings"
2019-2021
TOI/GP (5v5)
Fiala: 12:26
Boeser: 14:00
G/60
Fiala: 0.94
Boeser: 0.72
P/60
Fiala: 2.23
Boeser: 1.93
xGAR
Fiala: 17.8
Boeser: 6.3
xWAR
Fiala: 3.2
Boeser: 1.1
xSPAR
Fiala: 6
Boeser: 2.1
g/GP
Fiala: 0.34
Boeser: 0.33
p/GP
Fiala: 0.81
Boeser: 0.78
Most Common Linemates
Fiala: Parise, Koivu, Johansson, Hartman, Bonino, Gaudreau, Hartman
Boeser: Pettersson, Miller, Hoglander
Since 2019-20, Fiala has the same output as Boeser despite less time, which means he scores at a higher rate. He drives play better and creates better offensive opportunities for himself and his linemates. He has a more positive impact on the game and contributes more to team success. He does all of this despite having significantly worse linemates.
The two teams have had similar PP% during that time, and Fiala and Boeser produce similar output (total points) on the PP as well, despite the fact that Boeser has averaged 1:03 more on the PP per game during that time. That means he gets 38% more PP time than Fiala does, and produces the same number of points on an equally competent power play.