Just to make sure: Would anyone give me ANYTHING for Phaneuf or would i have to give up something to get rid of him?
At his current contract, in this game, it will probably take you a 1st and decent prospect or player to get rid of him.
At 50% retained, you might be able to sell him as a 3rd pairing D man but don't expect an amazing player in return.
Using my own roster for example (not offering, just examples)
Phaneuf (50% retained) for ...
Moulson, but you might have to add a pick
Brouwer, you'd definitely have to add a pick
Shaw, contract wise probably about even, but I'd say you'd have to add a decent prospect
That's just some examples, in my opinion only. You'd have to find someone that judges him to have positive value at 50% first, which may be difficult.
At 100% salary, I would say he has a large negative value.
Well, as much as it pains me to say, I think it's time to find a replacement owner for the Anaheim Ducks.
I've done everything I feel I can do here and I just don't have any interest in the game anymore. It was fun when it started but I've lost interest in the last couple of weeks. I don't visit the site as much as I used to and that's just not fair to everyone else. The only reason I've held on to it for this long, is I didn't want someone to take over and bastardize the hell out of what I've done
I'm confident that the new owner will be pleased with what I've left for him/her.
Take care everyone!
I've copied this on my team thread as well as the BOG thread.
Just to make sure: Would anyone give me ANYTHING for Phaneuf or would i have to give up something to get rid of him?
You're giving up something to get rid of him.
Quoting: ricochetii
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
Just to make sure: Would anyone give me ANYTHING for Phaneuf or would i have to give up something to get rid of him?
At his current contract, in this game, it will probably take you a 1st and decent prospect or player to get rid of him.
At 50% retained, you might be able to sell him as a 3rd pairing D man but don't expect an amazing player in return.
Using my own roster for example (not offering, just examples)
Phaneuf (50% retained) for ...
Moulson, but you might have to add a pick
Brouwer, you'd definitely have to add a pick
Shaw, contract wise probably about even, but I'd say you'd have to add a decent prospect
That's just some examples, in my opinion only. You'd have to find someone that judges him to have positive value at 50% first, which may be difficult.
At 100% salary, I would say he has a large negative value.
Only because you asked.
Why would i have to add if i was taking salary in a Phaneuf-Moulson trade? Also, i would take back another bad contract in a Phaneuf trade. He's a top 4 defenseman, so if i took back more salary could i get a 1st?
At his current contract, in this game, it will probably take you a 1st and decent prospect or player to get rid of him.
At 50% retained, you might be able to sell him as a 3rd pairing D man but don't expect an amazing player in return.
Using my own roster for example (not offering, just examples)
Phaneuf (50% retained) for ...
Moulson, but you might have to add a pick
Brouwer, you'd definitely have to add a pick
Shaw, contract wise probably about even, but I'd say you'd have to add a decent prospect
That's just some examples, in my opinion only. You'd have to find someone that judges him to have positive value at 50% first, which may be difficult.
At 100% salary, I would say he has a large negative value.
Only because you asked.
Why would i have to add if i was taking salary in a Phaneuf-Moulson trade? Also, i would take back another bad contract in a Phaneuf trade. He's a top 4 defenseman, so if i took back more salary could i get a 1st?
If you want a 1st for Phaneuf, you'd have to take back a higher value in bad contracts than Phaneuf's.
Someone might give you a 1st if they are a die hard Phaneuf fan and you retain 50%, but a 2nd is more likely.
Phaneuf @ 50% retained for a 2nd seems reasonable. You'd have to take back at least a somewhat bad contract to upgrade that to a 1st.
Let's say Johnathon Ericsson for example.
Phaneuf @30-40% retained for Ericsson + 1st sounds about right to me.
Why would i have to add if i was taking salary in a Phaneuf-Moulson trade? Also, i would take back another bad contract in a Phaneuf trade. He's a top 4 defenseman, so if i took back more salary could i get a 1st?
If you want a 1st for Phaneuf, you'd have to take back a higher value in bad contracts than Phaneuf's.
Someone might give you a 1st if they are a die hard Phaneuf fan and you retain 50%, but a 2nd is more likely.
Phaneuf @ 50% retained for a 2nd seems reasonable. You'd have to take back at least a somewhat bad contract to upgrade that to a 1st.
Let's say Johnathon Ericsson for example.
Phaneuf @30-40% retained for Ericsson + 1st sounds about right to me.
Yeah, i mean if i took back a bunch of salary. Like, if i took 7mil in bad contracts and a 1st for Phaneuf.
If you want a 1st for Phaneuf, you'd have to take back a higher value in bad contracts than Phaneuf's.
Someone might give you a 1st if they are a die hard Phaneuf fan and you retain 50%, but a 2nd is more likely.
Phaneuf @ 50% retained for a 2nd seems reasonable. You'd have to take back at least a somewhat bad contract to upgrade that to a 1st.
Let's say Johnathon Ericsson for example.
Phaneuf @30-40% retained for Ericsson + 1st sounds about right to me.
Yeah, i mean if i took back a bunch of salary. Like, if i took 7mil in bad contracts and a 1st for Phaneuf.
so 7 million in bad contracts is worse than the pylon @ 7mil?
It might be just me. Either because I'm more accustomed to watching Price or because there is so much yellow and orange present that my eyes are bugging out, but Rinne looks so frenetic at times it worries me. Price is like a sloth compared to Rinne most of the time.
But seriously. That's a lot of yellow. I haven't seen that much yellow since the last time I watched Minions with my nieces.
It might be just me. Either because I'm more accustomed to watching Price or because there is so much yellow and orange present that my eyes are bugging out, but Rinne looks so frenetic at times it worries me. Price is like a sloth compared to Rinne most of the time.
But seriously. That's a lot of yellow. I haven't seen that much yellow since the last time I watched Minions with my nieces.
Price is the best goalie in the world and nobody is even close. He makes the game look very easy.
It might be just me. Either because I'm more accustomed to watching Price or because there is so much yellow and orange present that my eyes are bugging out, but Rinne looks so frenetic at times it worries me. Price is like a sloth compared to Rinne most of the time.
But seriously. That's a lot of yellow. I haven't seen that much yellow since the last time I watched Minions with my nieces.
I totally see what you're saying, Rinne and especially Bobrovsky in round one looked very jumpy and frenetic when playing against the Pens. Anderson generally looked cool and collected and I don't remember if Holtby was jumpy or chill. Maybe the Pens get into opposing goalies heads?
It might be just me. Either because I'm more accustomed to watching Price or because there is so much yellow and orange present that my eyes are bugging out, but Rinne looks so frenetic at times it worries me. Price is like a sloth compared to Rinne most of the time.
But seriously. That's a lot of yellow. I haven't seen that much yellow since the last time I watched Minions with my nieces.
Price is the best goalie in the world and nobody is even close. He makes the game look very easy.
So are we just going to do BPA for Anaheim? Can we and move on? He's done, it's not like he'll care. And the new GM will be ill prepared to make the pick
So are we just going to do BPA for Anaheim? Can we and move on? He's done, it's not like he'll care. And the new GM will be ill prepared to make the pick
While that's up to the BOG in the end, we are ahead of schedule and Anaheim's window is still open, so there's no need to rush.
There is an assistant next in line, hopefully he sees the positional opening before draft pick is due.
and when is the draft pick due. side note, if I contact a BOG through this forum or through a faux social media, can I request who my pick would be in the event that I am unable to select my pick in my designated slot?
and when is the draft pick due. side note, if I contact a BOG through this forum or through a faux social media, can I request who my pick would be in the event that I am unable to select my pick in my designated slot?
Pick due at 11 AM tomorrow morning. I have no problem with being allowed to contact a BOG thru social media or email to get a pick secured in case of absence.
Pick due at 11 AM tomorrow morning. I have no problem with being allowed to contact a BOG thru social media or email to get a pick secured in case of absence.
thanks. I should hopefully be on, but I will be in contact before hand, I will most likely contact your faux gmail early with my two options, in order of preference, since the ANA GM is AWOL
Pick due at 11 AM tomorrow morning. I have no problem with being allowed to contact a BOG thru social media or email to get a pick secured in case of absence.
thanks. I should hopefully be on, but I will be in contact before hand, I will most likely contact your faux gmail early with my two options, in order of preference, since the ANA GM is AWOL
Ok sounds good, I'll be out of the house, but I'll try and sync the faux gmail to my phone to do that