Quoting: Boldirev
Boston would have to add quite a bit for Miller as DeBrusk isn't that much at all. The kid often has so little impact on a game, he reminds of the other Jake......Virtaanen.
virtanen's best year was debrusk worst year don't even compare them you got a kid who had 1 rough year compared to a bust.
pearson is not worth the same as debrusk every year but 2019/20 in terms of ppg debrusk has out produced pearson. even in debrusk worst year which people called him a bust for he still produced the same as pearson. a big thing too is debrusk is freshly turned 25 and has time to breakout again given new scenery pearson is 29 and hasnt looked really much more then an average 3rd liner since he was playing top 6 minutes with way better players lined with him making him look good.
the point of trading debrusk is too improve our squad whether we have to add or not bruins will not move a 3LW for a 3LW if boston moves debrusk for a player of similiar talent it will be for a player of similiar age that plays C or RW(righty as well)
the targets i could see being moved 1 for 1 are strome or labanc. pearson is of no interest to boston.
move on from that trade as you are only gonna get ripped on from the bruins community
B's have made it pretty clear C and LHD are their target of needs
what has came out is that players like
Miller
Hertl
both stromes
Manson
Lindholm are players they have been interested in
also considering most SJ fans have been good to a E kane 50% for debrusk trade id much rather have a proven 60 point scorer that is 29 and hope bergy and marchy can help him change as a person.
sorry but pearson is at the bottom of our target list if we were to acquire to trade him it wouldn't be for debrusk i might offer lazar and a 4th maybe or just a 3rd