SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline cap space

Created by: Byrr
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 2, 2022
Published: Jan. 2, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
From Earl Schwartz: 'If they trade Ritchie [today] and keep this group of 21 (swap Biega for Sandin), the Leafs have $1.7m in cap space.

If they could keep that roster until the trade deadline, Toronto would have over $5m to spend at the deadline.'
https://twitter.com/EarlSchwartz27/status/1477445833461219330
Trades
TOR
    I don't care.
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$81,500,000$79,783,116$0$400,000$1,716,884
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,645,000$1,645,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,800,000$3,800,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $894,167$894,167
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
    RD
    RFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 7:32 a.m.
    #1
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,429
    Likes: 22,636
    Yea, I don't see Ritchie traded though. I really wonder what Dubas was thinking last summer when the cap tight Leafs signed him. But not only Dubas, the high priced Leaf executives who also have duties related to the cap and the structure of the the team. Gee, they could have gone on CapFriendly and decided, "Hey this isn't going to work with Ritchie."
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 7:40 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 6,287
    Likes: 3,033
    Quoting: palhal
    Yea, I don't see Ritchie traded though. I really wonder what Dubas was thinking last summer when the cap tight Leafs signed him. But not only Dubas, the high priced Leaf executives who also have duties related to the cap and the structure of the the team. Gee, they could have gone on CapFriendly and decided, "Hey this isn't going to work with Ritchie."


    I mean Ritchie hasn't played well but there wasn't much reason to think he wouldn't before the season. They signed a player who was on pace for 20ish goals and 40ish points the season before who comes with 'size' and 'grit', The Leafs took 4 low cost gambles on players, Ritchie, Kampf, Kase and Bunting. Ritchie stands out because he's the only one who didn't work. Bringing in an excess number of them was an insurance policy.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 7:44 a.m.
    #3
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,429
    Likes: 22,636
    Quoting: Byrr
    I mean Ritchie hasn't played well but there wasn't much reason to think he wouldn't before the season. The Leafs took 4 low cost gambles on players, Ritchie, Kampf, Kase and Bunting. Ritchie stands out because he's the only one who didn't work out. Bringing in an excess number of them was an insurance policy.


    It's just the 2.5m that seemed unworkable. Remember he was probably the last signing of the summer. Even if he was playing to a 2.5m level it's still a cap issue. But you're right about the other three, great 3.7m value.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 7:45 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 6,287
    Likes: 3,033
    Quoting: palhal
    It's just the 2.5m that seemed unworkable. Remember he was probably the last signing of the summer. Even if he was playing to a 2.5m level it's still a cap issue. But you're right about the other three, great 3.7m value.


    2.5m isn't a cap issue. Any one of those players could be removed from the list and the cap would work.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 7:51 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2021
    Posts: 879
    Likes: 535
    Quoting: Byrr
    2.5m isn't a cap issue. Any one of those players could be removed from the list and the cap would work.


    This is a quality assessment. Taking the low-budget risks that they had to has paid off really well and management should be praised for utilizing the small cap space they had to make this team.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 8:38 a.m.
    #6
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: palhal
    Yea, I don't see Ritchie traded though. I really wonder what Dubas was thinking last summer when the cap tight Leafs signed him. But not only Dubas, the high priced Leaf executives who also have duties related to the cap and the structure of the the team. Gee, they could have gone on CapFriendly and decided, "Hey this isn't going to work with Ritchie."


    So far has anything they did in the offseason hurt the team? Top 5 in the league and good depth. Injuries happen and it hasn't hurt them at all.
    Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 8:59 a.m.
    #7
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,429
    Likes: 22,636
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    So far has anything they did in the offseason hurt the team? Top 5 in the league and good depth. Injuries happen and it hasn't hurt them at all.


    You're right so far. But no doubt about it, Ritchie's 2.5m cap hit especially next season is causes problems. Actually I'm sorta content leaving the team the way it is this year.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 9:08 a.m.
    #8
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: palhal
    You're right so far. But no doubt about it, Ritchie's 2.5m cap hit especially next season is causes problems. Actually I'm sorta content leaving the team the way it is this year.


    I do think he could prove more valuable than anyone gives him credit for down the road. The playoffs slow down once the refs put away their whistles and then a big boy who can get to the net and hit may be better deeper in the playoffs than in the regular season.
    Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 9:19 a.m.
    #9
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,429
    Likes: 22,636
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    I do think he could prove more valuable than anyone gives him credit for down the road. The playoffs slow down once the refs put away their whistles and then a big boy who can get to the net and hit may be better deeper in the playoffs than in the regular season.


    Well maybe, but who does he replace on LW? Barring injuries Bird, Kerfoot, last nights Mikheyev and Engvall are superior players.
    Jan. 2, 2022 at 9:32 a.m.
    #10
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: palhal
    Well maybe, but who does he replace on LW? Barring injuries Bird, Kerfoot, last nights Mikheyev and Engvall are superior players.


    There is almost zero chance they don't deal with injuries.
    palhal and Sign_em_up000000 liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll