SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Potential Deadline Trades

Created by: tkecanuck341
Team: 2021-22 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 3, 2022
Published: Jan. 4, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Using the rumored trade return posted today by Kypreos

https://twitter.com/puckinpod/status/1478121270025891849
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Kempe, Adrian ($1,000,000 retained)
2.
ARI
  1. Grans, Helge
  2. Grundström, Carl
  3. Määttä, Olli
  4. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Can substitute any RHD in the organization not named Doughty or Clarke for Grans if you prefer. Maatta included for cap purposes.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Termination Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2023
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$75,069,654$0$2,970,000$6,430,346
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,875,000$1,875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$800,000$800,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$62,500$62K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$858,333$858,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,700,000$2,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 4, 2022 at 12:27 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
y r leafs adding a first? Kerfoot and Kempe are at about the same points per game
Jan. 4, 2022 at 12:39 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,516
Likes: 6,127
Quoting: Ryancnbb
y r leafs adding a first? Kerfoot and Kempe are at about the same points per game


Kempe leads the Kings in goals and has about 30% of the cap hit that Kerfoot does after the retained salary. Quite a big difference between 4g and 14g.

You can take him out of the trade if you want, I just threw him in because I figured Toronto would want the cap relief for next season and adding Kempe would make him expendable.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 2:32 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Kempe leads the Kings in goals and has about 30% of the cap hit that Kerfoot does after the retained salary. Quite a big difference between 4g and 14g.

You can take him out of the trade if you want, I just threw him in because I figured Toronto would want the cap relief for next season and adding Kempe would make him expendable.


that's true I guess. I would rather them add a guy like Kempe without making a subtraction like Kerfoot tho
Jan. 4, 2022 at 7:27 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Kempe leads the Kings in goals and has about 30% of the cap hit that Kerfoot does after the retained salary. Quite a big difference between 4g and 14g.

You can take him out of the trade if you want, I just threw him in because I figured Toronto would want the cap relief for next season and adding Kempe would make him expendable.


And Kempe would be a goal scorer in TO why? If he is in the top 6 the list of better goal scorers is a lot longer in TO than it is in LA. Likely plays with JT and Nylander both of whom are better goal scorers.

Your logic is flawed
Jan. 4, 2022 at 1:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,516
Likes: 6,127
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
And Kempe would be a goal scorer in TO why? If he is in the top 6 the list of better goal scorers is a lot longer in TO than it is in LA. Likely plays with JT and Nylander both of whom are better goal scorers.

Your logic is flawed


I don't understand your argument. Kempe has found a way to score consistently on a team that has struggled to score goals for over a decade, and he has done so while playing within the defense-first system that the Kings play. Put him on a team that plays an offensive system like the Leafs, and his goal scoring goes up, not down. Right now he's on pace for 35g with the Kings. He'd be good for 40+ on the Leafs, while also being able to log minutes on the PP and PK.

Not sure why you seem to think his goal scoring goes down when lined up with "better" players.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 3:27 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I don't understand your argument. Kempe has found a way to score consistently on a team that has struggled to score goals for over a decade, and he has done so while playing within the defense-first system that the Kings play. Put him on a team that plays an offensive system like the Leafs, and his goal scoring goes up, not down. Right now he's on pace for 35g with the Kings. He'd be good for 40+ on the Leafs, while also being able to log minutes on the PP and PK.

Not sure why you seem to think his goal scoring goes down when lined up with "better" players.


Being a good player on a bad team does not make someone a better player on a better team. In TO he wouldn't score more, his opportunities would be far fewer in TO than it is in LA.

Kerfoot is a better playmaker and that works great with Nylander and JT.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 3:34 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,516
Likes: 6,127
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Being a good player on a bad team does not make someone a better player on a better team. In TO he wouldn't score more, his opportunities would be far fewer in TO than it is in LA.

Kerfoot is a better playmaker and that works great with Nylander and JT.


I'd argue that LA isn't a bad team, they're just a low scoring one. They're in the top 25% of the league in GA/G. Kempe has found a way to score with the Kings that no LW has been able to do since Luc Robitaille retired.

Kempe is an upgrade over Michael Bunting. Keep Kerfoot with JT and Nyander and put Kempe on a line with Matthews and Marner. Send Nick Ritchie in the trade instead. Like I said above, I only put Kerfoot in the deal because I thought Toronto would want to be rid of his cap hit next season.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 5:17 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I'd argue that LA isn't a bad team, they're just a low scoring one. They're in the top 25% of the league in GA/G. Kempe has found a way to score with the Kings that no LW has been able to do since Luc Robitaille retired.

Kempe is an upgrade over Michael Bunting. Keep Kerfoot with JT and Nyander and put Kempe on a line with Matthews and Marner. Send Nick Ritchie in the trade instead. Like I said above, I only put Kerfoot in the deal because I thought Toronto would want to be rid of his cap hit next season.


Kerfoot is a good player. He isn't a cap dump. He's actually scoring at a higher rate than Kempe and can play well anywhere in the lineup. He's valuable.

For all your pumping Kempe's tires, the best LW since Luc Robitaille, his career high in points is 37. The Leafs don't need him. Not at all. We have fast, defensively responsible wingers for the bottom 6 already. And it didn't cost us a 1st and a good player to get them.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 5:31 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,516
Likes: 6,127
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Kerfoot is a good player. He isn't a cap dump. He's actually scoring at a higher rate than Kempe and can play well anywhere in the lineup. He's valuable.

For all your pumping Kempe's tires, the best LW since Luc Robitaille, his career high in points is 37. The Leafs don't need him. Not at all. We have fast, defensively responsible wingers for the bottom 6 already. And it didn't cost us a 1st and a good player to get them.


Kempe didn't begin to excel until moved to the wing last season. He's now on pace for 35g and 50p, being one of the only consistently productive players on the team this season. He hasn't played in the bottom six since before the pandemic started.

Like I said, if you want to keep Kerfoot, then replace him with Ritchie in the trade. Neither player would be brought back after their contract expires next season anyway.
Jan. 4, 2022 at 11:18 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Kempe didn't begin to excel until moved to the wing last season. He's now on pace for 35g and 50p, being one of the only consistently productive players on the team this season. He hasn't played in the bottom six since before the pandemic started.

Like I said, if you want to keep Kerfoot, then replace him with Ritchie in the trade. Neither player would be brought back after their contract expires next season anyway.


I don't think it'll cost a 1st to move Ritchie and even still, I don't see the need for Kempe. In TO he's battling Mikheyev and Engvall for 3rd LW minutes and he makes more than his competition. While being a better player, it still costs too much to obtain him. I am certain Dubas can draft a better player than Kempe with a 1st rounder.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll