SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Ready to rumble

Created by: math731
Team: 2021-22 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 5, 2022
Published: Jan. 5, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Knies, Matthew [Reserve List]
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Ritchie, Nick
  4. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Price, Carey ($4,500,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$81,500,000$73,255,060$597,561$1,475,000$8,244,940
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,875,000$2,875,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$761,250$761,250
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$848,333$848,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2022 at 11:18 p.m.
#1
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 4,683
Pretty good, but add another prospect
Jan. 6, 2022 at 4:20 a.m.
#2
larter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 257
Likes: 91
if he was healthy its a real consideration, frankly would add abramov and/or SDA if needed.

As an aside how much for Toffoli or Edmundson at half
Jan. 6, 2022 at 6:50 a.m.
#3
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
why roll the dice on price when the leafs could just sign campbell who is playing well. id rather gamble on mrazek to be honest.
Jan. 6, 2022 at 9:10 a.m.
#4
In Pridham we trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1,969
Edited Jan. 6, 2022 at 9:20 a.m.
Quoting: larter232
if he was healthy its a real consideration, frankly would add abramov and/or SDA if needed.

As an aside how much for Toffoli or Edmundson at half


No, it's not.

Salary cap exists.

And the Leafs have a goalie putting up > .930 SV% during his time as a Leaf. Ridiculous to move valuable pieces to "upgrade" at G.
Jan. 6, 2022 at 3:54 p.m.
#5
larter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 257
Likes: 91
Quoting: Barilko14
No, it's not.

Salary cap exists.

And the Leafs have a goalie putting up > .930 SV% during his time as a Leaf. Ridiculous to move valuable pieces to "upgrade" at G.


yep all good points the only part i dont super agree with is (Ridiculous to move valuable pieces to "upgrade" at G.)
Price is different he just is its not the same as doing this for like matt murray or robin lehner or jonathan quick or thatcher demko, the only reason its a consideration is because of who it is

If hes healthy and i mean as close to 100% as he can get yeah i would trade this package for him(mostly cause in reality its knies+1st for price 40% retained) if they retained more i would trade maybe 1 additional piece, hell if you could get a third team involved somehow to retain another million or 2 it would be insane(super unlikely though)

Price at 5.25 is gross at even less its even more gross

But i can understand why someone might not want to do that, hes older and the contract is quite long so its completely understandable
Jan. 6, 2022 at 4:16 p.m.
#6
In Pridham we trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1,969
Edited Jan. 6, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
Quoting: larter232
yep all good points the only part i dont super agree with is (Ridiculous to move valuable pieces to "upgrade" at G.)
Price is different he just is its not the same as doing this for like matt murray or robin lehner or jonathan quick or thatcher demko, the only reason its a consideration is because of who it is

If hes healthy and i mean as close to 100% as he can get yeah i would trade this package for him(mostly cause in reality its knies+1st for price 40% retained) if they retained more i would trade maybe 1 additional piece, hell if you could get a third team involved somehow to retain another million or 2 it would be insane(super unlikely though)

Price at 5.25 is gross at even less its even more gross

But i can understand why someone might not want to do that, hes older and the contract is quite long so its completely understandable


You don't gamble Matthews, Marner, etc. prime on Price staying healthy. And you really don't when it would actually cost something to acquire him. Look at how they found Campbell. Trevor Moore and a pick, and he'll be in Vezina contention if he keeps playing at his pace.

Montreal 3 years ago brought in keith kinkaid to be a "Curtis McElhinney" type backup,and that cost them the season. They needed to trade decent assets for a 1B goalie as between Price annual injuries, or his poor play they needed a reliable 1B type goalie. That was 2 years ago. Leafs wouldn't have that luxury. They would have to have J. Woll types, or L. Domingue, or Hutchinson types to back him up, they can't afford to pay their combined G over $6M.

He wouldn't all of the sudden become a 65 game starter again the instant he got to Toronto.

It's not a risk worth taking, it's not a risk worth even considering. And given the Leafs real life cap situation, it would never be an option in reality anyways.

Additionally, the more Knies and top picks that are tossed away year after year, the harder it is for the Leafs to have actual decent depth. They've done well this year but for every Bunting, Kase, and Kampf there is five Thorntons, Veseys and Lindholms. Dumpster diving year after year to fill out the bottom 6 is pretty big risk, and is avoided by having a decent prospect cupboard.

A future LW group of Bunting, Robertson, Amirov and Knies all playing on affordable deals would be a huge competitive advantage for the Leafs.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll