SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A hypothetical rebuild

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2022-23 Dallas Stars
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 9, 2022
Published: Jan. 9, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
2$863,333
3$863,333
3$863,333
2$795,000
1$750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,000,000
3$3,500,000
1$3,000,000
1$874,125
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
DAL
  1. Foote, Cal
  2. 2022 1st round pick (TBL)
Additional Details:
D Jan Rutta
TBL
  1. Hanley, Joel
  2. 2023 6th round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
D John Klingberg ($2,125,000 salary retained)

2021-22 Trade deadline deal

Tampa also moves a third rounder to ARI to retain the remaining half of Klingberg's contract ($1,062,500)
2.
DAL
  1. Drury, Jack
  2. Gardiner, Jake
  3. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
CAR
    F Joe Pavelski ($3,500,000 salary retained)

    2021-22 Trade deadline deal
    3.
    DAL
    1. Jonsson-Fjällby, Axel
    2. 2022 2nd round pick (WPG)
    Additional Details:
    D Michal Kempny
    WSH
      F Alexander Radulov ($3,125,000 salary retained)

      2021-22 Trade deadline deal
      4.
      DAL
      1. 2023 2nd round pick (COL)
      COL
      1. 2022 5th round pick (DAL)
      Additional Details:
      G Braden Holtby

      2021-22 Trade deadline deal
      5.
      DAL
      1. 2022 4th round pick (NSH)
      NSH
        F Michael Raffl

        2021-22 Trade deadline deal
        6.
        DAL
        1. 2023 5th round pick (WPG)
        WPG
          D Andrej Sekera

          2021-22 Trade deadline deal
          7.
          CGY
          1. Seguin, Tyler
          Additional Details:
          2022 NHL Entry Draft deal

          A complete shot in the dark. Both top-6 centers have underperformed recently. Seguin is obviously the better of the two, but his contract is also far riskier. If Calgary is looking to contend in the near future they'd need an established 1C, and a change of scenery for the latter part of Seguin's career would likely favor it over staying in a rebuilding team.
          8.
          DAL
          1. Kravtsov, Vitali [RFA Rights]
          NYR
          1. Dellandrea, Ty
          Additional Details:
          2022 NHL Entry Draft deal

          A prospect swap. NYR is lacking in C prospects but are stacked with wingers, and the reverse is true for Dallas.
          9.
          DAL
          1. Bailey, Josh
          2. 2024 6th round pick (NYI)
          NYI
          1. Suter, Ryan
          2. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
          Additional Details:
          2022 NHL Entry Draft deal
          10.
          DAL
          MTL
          1. Eriksson, Albin [Reserve List]
          2. Faksa, Radek
          3. 2024 7th round pick (DAL)
          Additional Details:
          2022 NHL Entry Draft deal
          11.
          DAL
          1. Johansson, Filip [Reserve List]
          MIN
          1. Tufte, Riley [RFA Rights]
          Additional Details:
          2022 NHL Entry Draft deal

          Swapping two former first round picks currently struggling with development
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2022
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the TBL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the WPG
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the NSH
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          2023
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the CAR
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the COL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the WPG
          Logo of the DAL
          2024
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the DAL
          Logo of the NYI
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          23$81,500,000$78,033,291$675,000$507,500$3,466,709
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $6,000,000$6,000,000
          LW, RW
          RFA - 4
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $3,150,000$3,150,000
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the New York Islanders
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          RW, LW, C
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
          $925,000$925,000
          C
          RFA - 2
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $6,375,000$6,375,000
          C, LW, RW
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $3,000,000$3,000,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
          LW, C
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $9,500,000$9,500,000
          LW, C
          NMC
          UFA - 3
          $874,125$874,125
          LW, RW
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $1,050,000$1,050,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          C, RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
          $3,400,000$3,400,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 3
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
          LD
          RFA - 2
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $8,450,000$8,450,000
          LD/RD
          UFA - 7
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $3,500,000$3,500,000
          G
          RFA - 3
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $5,800,000$5,800,000
          LD
          NMC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
          $850,000$850,000
          RD
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $3,333,333$3,333,333
          G
          UFA - 1
          $925,000$925,000
          LD/RD
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          RD
          UFA - 2
          ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
          Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
          $4,050,000$4,050,000
          LD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $4,916,667$4,916,667
          G
          M-NTC, NMC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Dallas Stars
          $803,333$803,333
          C
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Washington Capitals
          $750,000$750,000
          LW
          UFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 1:28 a.m.
          #1
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2019
          Posts: 10,312
          Likes: 3,987
          my personal favorite is the islanders deal.

          Krav deal makes sense. I like the motivation behind the Calgary trade. MTL trade probably isn't necessary but is fair.

          I think the Pavelski return is a bit ripe, as is the Washington trade for Radulov, but otherwise the trades are close enough or go to logical places and makes for a good and reasonable build. Obviously not all these trades happen, but individually any one or two of them make sense.
          justaBoss liked this.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 2:23 a.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Aug. 2020
          Posts: 11,375
          Likes: 9,024
          That’s an easy no for COL, but Faksa would be worth talking about.
          TJTwolf liked this.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 2:36 a.m.
          #3
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2018
          Posts: 19,537
          Likes: 5,032
          Canes pass. You might be able to get Drury for Pavelski, but not with a 1st, even retained. A 37-year-old rental won't command that type of return. You're looking at no pick and leaving Gardiner, or a FAR lesser prospect. Perhaps someone like Ponomarev, Blake, Orr. Even multiple of those likely won't be out of the question, but Carolina is likely going to keep the 1st, especially taking a future 1st unprotected.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 3:34 a.m.
          #4
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Xqb15a
          That’s an easy no for COL, but Faksa would be worth talking about.


          Faksa is available. What do you consider a fair return?
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 3:37 a.m.
          #5
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Caniac2000
          Canes pass. You might be able to get Drury for Pavelski, but not with a 1st, even retained. A 37-year-old rental won't command that type of return. You're looking at no pick and leaving Gardiner, or a FAR lesser prospect. Perhaps someone like Ponomarev, Blake, Orr. Even multiple of those likely won't be out of the question, but Carolina is likely going to keep the 1st, especially taking a future 1st unprotected.


          Depends how good player he is. As a rental his age shouldn't matter, it's not like it'd hinder or be a burden for you in the long-term.

          I tend to agree that Drury+1st for Pavs is a bit overpayment so I added Gardiner as a cap dump to the exchange. Imo that'd justify the return.

          In any case, a first would have to come DAL's way, and preferably an unprotected one. Canes just don't have a 2022 pick to offer.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 4:51 a.m.
          #6
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jan. 2017
          Posts: 9,545
          Likes: 4,566
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Faksa is available. What do you consider a fair return?


          Be interested to hear how Dallas fans value him myself. I'm with Xqb that he'd be of interest, but not really sure on value.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 4:55 a.m.
          #7
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: TJTwolf
          Be interested to hear how Dallas fans value him myself. I'm with Xqb that he'd be of interest, but not really sure on value.


          Well you can see how I valued him in the earlier Habs trade. I think a low 2nd, early third would suffice, or a prospect equivalent to that, alongside a cap dump assuming COL is lacking in cap space.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 5:39 a.m.
          #8
          Banned
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Sep. 2021
          Posts: 12,418
          Likes: 2,630
          Quoting: TJTwolf
          Be interested to hear how Dallas fans value him myself. I'm with Xqb that he'd be of interest, but not really sure on value.


          No more than a 4th/5th round pick I'm guessing, but I'm not a Dallas fan. What I do know is that Faksa has not performed well over this season or the last since his contract extension kicked in, so maybe even less. I don't think he's at the point of being a negative asset, but his trade value isn't very high
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 6:25 a.m.
          #9
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jan. 2017
          Posts: 9,545
          Likes: 4,566
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Well you can see how I valued him in the earlier Habs trade. I think a low 2nd, early third would suffice, or a prospect equivalent to that, alongside a cap dump assuming COL is lacking in cap space.


          Quoting: Knuckl3s
          No more than a 4th/5th round pick I'm guessing, but I'm not a Dallas fan. What I do know is that Faksa has not performed well over this season or the last since his contract extension kicked in, so maybe even less. I don't think he's at the point of being a negative asset, but his trade value isn't very high


          Appreciate the info.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 7:22 a.m.
          #10
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2018
          Posts: 19,537
          Likes: 5,032
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Depends how good player he is. As a rental his age shouldn't matter, it's not like it'd hinder or be a burden for you in the long-term.

          I tend to agree that Drury+1st for Pavs is a bit overpayment so I added Gardiner as a cap dump to the exchange. Imo that'd justify the return.

          In any case, a first would have to come DAL's way, and preferably an unprotected one. Canes just don't have a 2022 pick to offer.


          Then there's no deal to be made. Teams fall off all the time, (NYI) trading NEXT years first would just be dumb. Also considering the Canes have traded 2 first round picks (moving down in the draft doesn't count) since 2006. Gardiner, if he's healthy, likely takes Cole's place. He's out for this year, but he's got value if he's healthy next year. If he's not healthy, he's some cap relief they can throw on LTIR.

          For Pavelski, I think both of these are too much for Carolina's interest. The best offer you'd likely get is Carolina's 2nd next year, the Chicago 3rd this year, and Nybeck, Blake, Gustlisov... prospects of that caliber.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:42 a.m.
          #11
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Caniac2000
          Then there's no deal to be made. Teams fall off all the time, (NYI) trading NEXT years first would just be dumb. Also considering the Canes have traded 2 first round picks (moving down in the draft doesn't count) since 2006. Gardiner, if he's healthy, likely takes Cole's place. He's out for this year, but he's got value if he's healthy next year. If he's not healthy, he's some cap relief they can throw on LTIR.

          For Pavelski, I think both of these are too much for Carolina's interest. The best offer you'd likely get is Carolina's 2nd next year, the Chicago 3rd this year, and Nybeck, Blake, Gustlisov... prospects of that caliber.


          Yeah, definitely no then. I don't see DAL having interest moving almost a PPG player for such garbage. Some other team very likely will pay an appropriate amount.
          Wqrrior liked this.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:44 a.m.
          #12
          Hop on the Slaftrain
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2019
          Posts: 16,169
          Likes: 20,492
          I'd do that Faksa trade if Harris doesn't matter show interest in signing.

          Signing Robertson to that deal would be such a steal
          justaBoss liked this.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 9:22 a.m.
          #13
          Craig Laughlin Fan
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Nov. 2019
          Posts: 5,293
          Likes: 5,740
          I’m not a fan of the Radulov deal here. It is better value than some other trades for him I’ve seen, but I don’t think Radulov is the right person the Caps should go for. Yeah it’s another Russian, but the Top 6 is pretty much set in stone once Mantha returns, and I don’t see Radulov on the first line due to how well Wilson plays with Kuzy and Ovi.

          If I’m Washington, I’m instead looking for possibly a 4th liner (Hagelin needs to be chucked into the sun at this point, not even his PK skills can save him), though I would not be surprised if Washington stands pat at the deadline, and chooses to replace liabilities like Hagelin with interior options, such as Leason or Protas.
          justaBoss liked this.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 11:26 a.m.
          #14
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Aug. 2020
          Posts: 11,375
          Likes: 9,024
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Faksa is available. What do you consider a fair return?


          Ok I won’t low ball you thoughts on Behren’s and a draft pick for Faksa w/$500k retained?
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 1:16 p.m.
          #15
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Xqb15a
          Ok I won’t low ball you thoughts on Behren’s and a draft pick for Faksa w/$500k retained?


          Not a huge fan of retaining on a player with several years left on his contract, and LHDs aren't exactly a need either. We'd prefer RHD or RW prospect.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 2:22 p.m.
          #16
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Aug. 2020
          Posts: 11,375
          Likes: 9,024
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Not a huge fan of retaining on a player with several years left on his contract, and LHDs aren't exactly a need either. We'd prefer RHD or RW prospect.


          Retention could be run through a 3rd team, what about Kaut, though in all honesty part of the appeal for Faksa for me is a mentoring role to Kaut whom I’m I still think is a solid NHLer with upside. Thoughts on Jost?
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 7:19 p.m.
          #17
          New Star Rising
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jul. 2018
          Posts: 486
          Likes: 130
          Have you considered trading John to a non playoff team that would want to sign him to 8 years? Ottawa received a lot from Karlsson, why not give some developed youth and a protected 1st for Klingberg.

          I like Raffl and Faksa. I’m not a fan of either trade.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 7:23 p.m.
          #18
          Banned
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Sep. 2021
          Posts: 12,418
          Likes: 2,630
          Quoting: C_M_O_R
          Have you considered trading John to a non playoff team that would want to sign him to 8 years? Ottawa received a lot from Karlsson, why not give some developed youth and a protected 1st for Klingberg.

          I like Raffl and Faksa. I’m not a fan of either trade.


          Come on man, Faksa has sucked ever since he signed his current contract kicked in
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:17 p.m.
          #19
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Xqb15a
          Retention could be run through a 3rd team, what about Kaut, though in all honesty part of the appeal for Faksa for me is a mentoring role to Kaut whom I’m I still think is a solid NHLer with upside. Thoughts on Jost?


          Jost and Kaut are both fine imo.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:18 p.m.
          #20
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: C_M_O_R
          Have you considered trading John to a non playoff team that would want to sign him to 8 years? Ottawa received a lot from Karlsson, why not give some developed youth and a protected 1st for Klingberg.

          I like Raffl and Faksa. I’m not a fan of either trade.


          I haven't since it seems rather unlikely that
          a) they'd want to spend assets on Klingberg
          b) Klingberg would want to re-sign there
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:53 p.m.
          #21
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2018
          Posts: 19,537
          Likes: 5,032
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Yeah, definitely no then. I don't see DAL having interest moving almost a PPG player for such garbage. Some other team very likely will pay an appropriate amount.


          If you think that is garbage, you need to go and educate yourself and quickly.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:55 p.m.
          #22
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Caniac2000
          If you think that is garbage, you need to go and educate yourself and quickly.


          Compared to Pavelski and what other teams likely will offer it's certainly garbage.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:57 p.m.
          #23
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2018
          Posts: 19,537
          Likes: 5,032
          Quoting: justaBoss
          Compared to Pavelski and what other teams likely will offer it's certainly garbage.


          😂😂😂😂😂

          Alright, you just proved to me beyond all doubt that your knowledge of prospects is awful. Have a good day.

          🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

          Calling Nybeck, Gus, and Blake garbage... that's going to make me laugh for a long time.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 8:58 p.m.
          #24
          Thread Starter
          What in tarnation
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Oct. 2017
          Posts: 32,709
          Likes: 31,449
          Quoting: Caniac2000
          😂😂😂😂😂

          Alright, you just proved to me beyond all doubt that your knowledge of prospects is awful. Have a good day.

          🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

          Calling Nybeck, Gus, and Blake garbage... that's going to make me laugh for a long time.


          At least one of us here is entertained with your ideas, but I know you tend to be rather biased.
          Jan. 9, 2022 at 9:04 p.m.
          #25
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2018
          Posts: 19,537
          Likes: 5,032
          Quoting: justaBoss
          At least one of us here is entertained with your ideas, but I know you tend to be rather biased.


          I had a whole essay typed out to correct you, but I can't be bothered because I know you're not exactly one to admit when you're wrong, like you are now. So have a good day.

          I still can't believe you called Gus, Blake and Nybeck garbage 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll