SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Some Depth Moves

Created by: bruinsdude77
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 15, 2022
Published: Jan. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
SEA
  1. Kuhlman, Karson
  2. Olson, Quinn [Reserve List]
  3. 2022 5th round pick (BOS)
2.
3.
VAN
  1. 2023 4th round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,260,674$1,956,507$0$1,239,326

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,000,000$2,000,000 ($875,000$875K$875,000$875K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$809,167$809,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000 ($1,625,000$2M$1,625,000$2M)
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15, 2022 at 2:29 a.m.
#1
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 1,183
Everyone definitely costs way more. I'd think Jarnkrok and Motte start at a 3rd, and Fabbro starts with a 1st, not a bunch of guys that wants out
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jan. 15, 2022 at 2:53 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: cooliny
Everyone definitely costs way more. I'd think Jarnkrok and Motte start at a 3rd, and Fabbro starts with a 1st, not a bunch of guys that wants out


I think the price with Motte starts with a 3rd, and Jarnkrok a 2nd maybe
Jan. 15, 2022 at 9:47 a.m.
#3
Mysteryman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 888
Likes: 340
Quoting: Knuckl3s
I think the price with Motte starts with a 3rd, and Jarnkrok a 2nd maybe


Does not matter, Boston has no need for either of them. Why waste draft capital on bottom 6 rentals when the bottom 6 is playing really well anyway.

Steen, Lazar, and Blidh have completed the lineup, trading for guys to replace them who are not an upgrade is pointless.
Jan. 15, 2022 at 1:59 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 506
Likes: 54
Quoting: Userunknown
Does not matter, Boston has no need for either of them. Why waste draft capital on bottom 6 rentals when the bottom 6 is playing really well anyway.

Steen, Lazar, and Blidh have completed the lineup, trading for guys to replace them who are not an upgrade is pointless.


You can appreciate how Steen and Blidh have played without declaring that Jarnkrok, with 73 points in his last 138 games, is “not an upgrade” or that Motte, who blocks shots and forces turnovers better than any Bruins forward is this season is not useful depth. This is a losing mentality.
Jan. 15, 2022 at 2:10 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 506
Likes: 54
Quoting: cooliny
Everyone definitely costs way more. I'd think Jarnkrok and Motte start at a 3rd, and Fabbro starts with a 1st, not a bunch of guys that wants out


People so quick to just say things and not put any real thought into it. Motte “starts with a third” but it’s ludicrous that I’m offering a fourth? Jarnkrok “starts with a third” and “costs way more” even though I’m offering Olson, a 2019 third-round pick leading one of the NCAA’s best teams in scoring, Kuhlman, a proven NHL depth player, and a fifth rounder? Fabbro “costs way more” and “starts with a first” even though Nashville was trying to trade him last year and I’m offering DeBrusk, who is only two years older and has way more experience to a team that lacks scoring depth,and taking a buried contract off of a budget team’s payroll?
Jan. 15, 2022 at 2:32 p.m.
#6
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 1,183
Quoting: bruinsdude77
People so quick to just say things and not put any real thought into it. Motte “starts with a third” but it’s ludicrous that I’m offering a fourth? Jarnkrok “starts with a third” and “costs way more” even though I’m offering Olson, a 2019 third-round pick leading one of the NCAA’s best teams in scoring, Kuhlman, a proven NHL depth player, and a fifth rounder? Fabbro “costs way more” and “starts with a first” even though Nashville was trying to trade him last year and I’m offering DeBrusk, who is only two years older and has way more experience to a team that lacks scoring depth,and taking a buried contract off of a budget team’s payroll?


ok, so i'll just say that nashville trade is way off
BruinsCharlies liked this.
Jan. 15, 2022 at 2:42 p.m.
#7
Mysteryman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 888
Likes: 340
Quoting: bruinsdude77
You can appreciate how Steen and Blidh have played without declaring that Jarnkrok, with 73 points in his last 138 games, is “not an upgrade” or that Motte, who blocks shots and forces turnovers better than any Bruins forward is this season is not useful depth. This is a losing mentality.


Steen and Blidh have a higner PPG this season than Jarnkrok. You are benching Steen who has been just as, if not more productive than the player you are giving up draft capital to obtain. Part of Boston’s problem with developing young talent and depleted farm system is their unwillingness to use them and replace them with veteran rentals.

Jarnkrok is a solid 3rd line 30 point FW that does nothing else. Does not hit anyone or block shots. Steen has 11 hits in 10 games compared to Calle’s 13 in 25. No, other than experience I don’t see it as an upgrade. If Steen falls off before the deadline then it’s a different story. But if he keeps producing it’s a waste of assets. And no Seattle does not take that deal. KK has no value, Olson is not likely an NHL caliber player. They can get a 2nd which at least has a chance of someone being useful. Something Boston’s farm system desperately needs.

There is nothing wrong with Jarnkrok. But this team is not in position to chase 3rd line rentals when they don’t need them.
BruinsCharlies liked this.
Jan. 16, 2022 at 1:15 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 326
Quoting: bruinsdude77
People so quick to just say things and not put any real thought into it. Motte “starts with a third” but it’s ludicrous that I’m offering a fourth? Jarnkrok “starts with a third” and “costs way more” even though I’m offering Olson, a 2019 third-round pick leading one of the NCAA’s best teams in scoring, Kuhlman, a proven NHL depth player, and a fifth rounder? Fabbro “costs way more” and “starts with a first” even though Nashville was trying to trade him last year and I’m offering DeBrusk, who is only two years older and has way more experience to a team that lacks scoring depth,and taking a buried contract off of a budget team’s payroll?


In the end Nashville is not trading a top 4 RD who is locked in at $2.4M for next year for a top 9 LW they would have to qualify at over $4M for next season. If you check Nashville's depth chart or watched the game yesterday you can see they have plenty of cost controlled scoring depth on LW.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll